Albacker TB, Arafat AA, Alotaibi AM, Alghosoon H, Algarni KD. Mechanical tricuspid valves have higher rate of reintervention: a single center experience. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;29(2):22–00086.

Article  Google Scholar 

Iscan ZH, Vural KM, Bahar I, Mavioglu L, Saritas A. What to expect after tricuspid valve replacement? Long-term results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;32(2):296–300.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Nooten GJ, Caes F, Taeymans Y, Van Belleghem Y, François K, De Bacquer D, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: Postoperative and long-term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110(3):672–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mangoni AA, DiSalvo TG, Vlahakes GJ, Polanczyk CA, Fifer MA. Outcome following isolated tricuspid valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19(1):68–73.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Filsoufi F, Anyanwu AC, Salzberg SP, Frankel T, Cohn LH, Adams DH. Long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement in the current era. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(3):845–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grondin P. The tricuspid valve: A surgical challenge

Braunwald NS, Ross J, Morrow AG. Conservative Management of Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement. Circulation. 1967;35(4s1):1–63.

Article  Google Scholar 

Baughman KL, Kallman CH, Yurchak PM, Daggett WM, Buckley MJ. Predictors of survival after tricuspid valve surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54(1):137–41.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaul T, Mercer J. Tricuspid valve replacement: factors influencing early and late mortality. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;38(04):229–35.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hauck AJ, Freeman DP, Ackermann DM, Danielson GK, Edwards WD. Surgical pathology of the tricuspid valve: a study of 363 cases spanning 25 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 1988;63(9):851–63.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pluth JR, Henry EF. Tricuspid insufficiency in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969;58(4):484–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cohen SR, Sell JE, McIntosh CL, Clark RE. Tricuspid regurgitation in patients with acquired, chronic, pure mitral regurgitation. II. Nonoperative management, tricuspid valve annuloplasty, and tricuspid valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1987;94(4):488–97.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McGrath LB, Gonzalez-Lavin L, Bailey BM, Grunkemeier GL, Fernandez J, Laub GW. Tricuspid valve operations in 530 patients. Twenty-five-year assessment of early and late phase events. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;99(1):124–33.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kay GL, Morita S, Mendez M, Zubiate P, Kay JH. Tricuspid regurgitation associated with mitral valve disease: Repair and replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;48(3):S93–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shahmohamadi E, Hadizadeh A, Ayati A, Tayebi A, Ahmadi Tafti SH, Abbasi K, et al. Evaluation of risk factors and outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve replacement with a conventional surgical approach: a retrospective cohort study. J Card Surg. 2023;9(2023):1–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Phan K, Tian DH, Cao C, Black D, Yan TD. Systematic review and meta-analysis: techniques and a guide for the academic surgeon. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;4(2):112–22.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sterne, J. A. C., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., Henry, D., Altman, D. G., Ansari, M. T., Boutron, I., Carpenter, J. R., Chan, A.-W., Churchill, R., Deeks, J. J., Hróbjartsson, A., Kirkham, J., Jüni, P., Loke, Y. K., Pigott, T. D., … Higgins, J. P. T. (2016). ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 355, i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

Ian Munro A, Eric Jamieson WR, Frank G, Tyers O, Germann E. Tricuspid valve replacement: Porcine bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:S470–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Scully HE, Armstrong CS. Tricuspid valve replacement: Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109(6):1035–41.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vannooten G, Caes F, Francois K, Taeymans Y, Primo G, Wellens F, et al. The valve choice in tricuspid valve replacement: 25 years of experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1995;9(8):441–7.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Hayashi J, Saito A, Yamamoto K, Watanabe H, Ohzeki H, Eguchi S. Is a bioprosthesis preferable in tricuspid valve replacement? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;44(05):230–3.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rizzoli G, De Perini L, Bottio T, Minutolo G, Thiene G, Casarotto D. Prosthetic replacement of the tricuspid valve: biological or mechanical? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(6):S62–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ratnatunga CP, Edwards MB, Dore CJ, Taylor KM. Tricuspid valve replacement: UK heart valve registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66(6):1940–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dalrymple-Hay MJ, Leung Y, Ohri SK, Haw MP, Ross JK, Livesey SA, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8(6):644–8.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaplan M, Kut MS, Demirtas MM, Cimen S, Ozler A. Prosthetic replacement of tricuspid valve: bioprosthetic or mechanical. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(2):467–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Solomon NAG, Lim RCH, Nand P, Graham KJ. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprosthetic or mechanical valve? Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2004;12(2):143–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rizzoli G, Vendramin I, Nesseris G, Bottio T, Guglielmi C, Schiavon L. Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? A meta-analysis of intra-institutional results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(5):1607–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carrier M, Hébert Y, Pellerin M, Bouchard D, Perrault LP, Cartier R, et al. Tricuspid valve replacement: an analysis of 25 years of experience at a single center. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(1):47–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang BC, Lim SH, Yi G, Hong YS, Lee S, Yoo KJ, et al. Long-Term clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(4):1317–24.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Civelek A, Ak K, Akgün S, Isbir S, Arsan S. Tricuspid valve replacement: an analysis of risk factors and outcomes. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;56(08):456–60.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tokunaga S, Tominaga R. Current status of the mechanical valve and bioprosthesis in Japan. J Artif Organs. 2008;11(2):53–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moraca RJ, Moon MR, Lawton JS, Guthrie TJ, Aubuchon KA, Moazami N, et al. Outcomes of tricuspid valve repair and replacement: a propensity analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87(1):83–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brown ML, Dearani JA, Danielson GK, Cetta F, Connolly HM, Warnes CA, et al. Comparison of the outcome of porcine bioprosthetic versus mechanical prosthetic replacement of the tricuspid valve in the ebstein anomaly. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103(4):555–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sung K, Park PW, Park KH, Jun TG, Lee YT, Yang JH, et al. Is tricuspid valve replacement a catastrophic operation? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;36(5):825–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garatti A, Nano G, Bruschi G, Canziani A, Colombo T, Frigiola A, et al. Twenty-Five year outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement comparing mechanical and biologic prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(4):1146–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hwang HY, Kim KH, Kim KB, Ahn H. Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement is not superior in patients younger than 65 years who need long-term anticoagulation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93(4):1154–60.