Tirumani SH, Fraser-Hill M, Auer R, Shabana W, Walsh C, Lee F, et al. Mucinous neoplasms of the appendix: a current comprehensive clinicopathologic and imaging review. Cancer Imaging. 2013;13(1):14–25.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Holt N, Gronbaek H. Goblet cell carcinoids of the appendix. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:543696.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rossi RE, Luong TV, Caplin ME, Thirlwell C, Meyer T, Garcia-Hernandez J, et al. Goblet cell appendiceal tumors–management dilemmas and long-term outcomes. Surg Oncol. 2015;24(1):47–53.
Mccusker ME, Cote TR, Clegg LX, Sobin LH. Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: a population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973–1998. Cancer. 2002;94(12):3307–12.
Carr NJ, Cecil TD, Mohamed F, Sobin LH, Sugarbaker PH, Gonzalez-Moreno S, et al. A Consensus for classification and Pathologic Reporting of Pseudomyxoma Peritonei and Associated Appendiceal Neoplasia: the results of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) modified Delphi process. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(1):14–26.
Matias-Garcia B, Mendoza-Moreno F, Blasco-Martinez A, Busteros-Moraza JI, Diez-Alonso M, Garcia-Moreno NF. A retrospective analysis and literature review of neoplastic appendiceal mucinous lesions. Bmc Surg. 2021;21(1):79.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ruiz-Tovar J, Teruel DG, Castineiras VM, Dehesa AS, Quindos PL, Molina EM. Mucocele of the appendix. World J Surg. 2007;31(3):542–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Menassel B, Duclos A, Passot G, Dohan A, Payet C, Isaac S, et al. Preoperative CT and MRI prediction of non-resectability in patients treated for pseudomyxoma peritonei from mucinous appendiceal neoplasms. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(4):558–66.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gundogar O, Kimiloglu E, Komut N, Cin M, Bektas S, Gonullu D, et al. Evaluation of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms with a new classification system and literature review. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2018;29(5):533–42.
Brassil M, Lee R, O’Neill D, Woods G, Moloney BM, Dunne R, et al. Appendiceal tumours - a correlation of CT features and histopathological diagnosis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022;66(1):92–101.
Leonards LM, Pahwa A, Patel MK, Petersen J, Nguyen MJ, Jude CM. Neoplasms of the appendix: Pictorial Review with Clinical and pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2017;37(4):1059–83.
Rohani P, Scotti SD, Shen P, Stewart JH, Russell GB, Cromer M, et al. Use of FDG-PET imaging for patients with disseminated cancer of the appendix. Am Surg. 2010;76(12):1338–44.
Altmann A, Haberkorn U, Siveke J. The latest developments in imaging of fibroblast activation protein. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(2):160–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pang Y, Zhao L, Luo Z, Hao B, Wu H, Lin Q, et al. Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG uptake in gastric, duodenal, and colorectal cancers. Radiology. 2021;298(2):393–402.
Koerber SA, Staudinger F, Kratochwil C, Adeberg S, Haefner MF, Ungerechts G, et al. The role of (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT for patients with malignancies of the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract: first clinical experience. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(9):1331–6.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Al-Ibraheem A, Alyasjeen SF, Abdlkadir AS, Sheikha AA. [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT depicts metastases from medullary thyroid cancer that [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT missed. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(13):4112–3.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Al-Ibraheem A, Al-Qasem S, El KM, Amarin R. 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT provides a clear picture of a Klatskin Tumor that 18 F-FDG PET/CT missed. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48(6):e313–5.
Rajaraman V, Meenakshi LA, Selvaraj AJ, Pottakkat B, Halanaik D. Role of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT in assessing Hepatobiliary malignancies: a prospective pilot study. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48(6):e281–8.
Al-Ibraheem A, Abdlkadir AS, Alalawi H, Badarneh M. 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT imaging: unveiling the hidden pitfalls. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48(11):965–6.
Bentestuen M, Al-Obaydi N, Zacho HD. FAPI-avid nonmalignant PET/CT findings: an expedited systematic review. Semin Nucl Med. 2023;53(5):694–705.
Chen H, Pang Y, Li J, Kang F, Xu W, Meng T, et al. Comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI and [(18)F]FDG uptake in patients with gastric signet-ring-cell carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study. Eur Radiol. 2022;33(2):1329–41.
Qiu L, Chen Y. (68)Ga-FAPI PET/CT depicted Non-FDG-Avid Metastatic Appendiceal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma. Radiology. 2021;301(1):45.
Hu K, Wang L, Wu H, Huang S, Tian Y, Wang Q, et al. [(18)F]FAPI-42 PET imaging in cancer patients: optimal acquisition time, biodistribution, and comparison with [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;49(8):2833–43.
Spencer BA, Berg E, Schmall JP, Omidvari N, Leung EK, Abdelhafez YG, et al. Performance evaluation of the uEXPLORER Total-Body PET/CT scanner based on NEMA NU 2-2018 with additional tests to characterize PET scanners with a long Axial Field of View. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(6):861–70.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tan H, Sui X, Yin H, Yu H, Gu Y, Chen S, et al. Total-body PET/CT using half-dose FDG and compared with conventional PET/CT using full-dose FDG in lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(6):1966–75.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang L, Tang G, Hu K, Liu X, Zhou W, Li H, et al. Comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of Advanced Lung Cancer. Radiology. 2022;303(1):191–9.
Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;82:359–74.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gundogan C, Komek H, Can C, Yildirim OA, Kaplan I, Erdur E, et al. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the staging and restaging of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2022;43(1):64–72.
Kuten J, Levine C, Shamni O, Pelles S, Wolf I, Lahat G, et al. Head-to-head comparison of [(68)Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [(18)F]-FDG PET/CT in evaluating the extent of disease in gastric adenocarcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49(2):743–50.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dong Y, Sun P, Wu H, Zhong J, Cao M, Tang G, et al. PET/CT imaging fibroblast activation protein in initial colorectal cancer: compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun. 2023;44(11):1011–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carr NJ, Bibeau F, Bradley RF, Dartigues P, Feakins RM, Geisinger KR, et al. The histopathological classification, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of mucinous appendiceal neoplasms, appendiceal adenocarcinomas and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Histopathology. 2017;71(6):847–58.
Minhas A, Hendrickson J, Minhas SA. Frequency and risk factors for Metastasis in newly diagnosed Appendiceal Carcinoma. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16341.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Akbulut S, Sahin TT. Comment on management and prognosis of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a clinicopathologic analysis of 50 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(12):2338.
Kehagias I, Zygomalas A, Markopoulos G, Papandreou T, Kraniotis P. Diagnosis and treatment of Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasm presented as Acute Appendicitis. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2016;2016:2161952.
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, et al. Development of Quinoline-based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(9):1415–22.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Loktev A, Lindner T, Mier W, Debus J, Altmann A, Jager D, et al. A tumor-imaging Method Targeting Cancer-Associated fibroblasts. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(9):1423–9.
留言 (0)