CounsellerAboelkassem QY. Recent technologies in cardiac imaging. Front Med Technol. 2023;4:984492.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tsapaki V. Radiation dose optimization in diagnostic and interventional radiology: current issues and future perspectives. Phys Med. 2020;79:16–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

RehaniNacouzi MMD. Higher patient doses through X-ray imaging procedures. Phys Med. 2020;79:80–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

MehnatiMalekzadehSooteh PRMY. New Bismuth composite shield for radiation protection of breast during coronary CT angiography. Iran J Radiology. 2019;16(3):e84763.

Google Scholar 

Power AD. Overutilization of computed tomography in clinical settings. Univ Lynchburg DMSc Dr Proj Assign Repos. 2022;4(1):72.

Google Scholar 

TsapakiDamilakisPauloSchegererRepussardJaschke VJGAAJW, et al. CT diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications: results of a large-scale European survey. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(7):4459–69.

Article  Google Scholar 

PloussiSyrgiamiotisMakriHatzigiorgiEfstathopoulos AVTCEP. Local diagnostic reference levels in pediatric CT scans: a survey at the largest children’s hospital in Greece. Br J Radiol. 2020;93(1116):20190358.

Article  Google Scholar 

MehnatiSootehMalekzadehDivbandRefahi PMYRBS. Breast conservation from radiation damage by using nano bismuth shields in chest computed tomography scan. Crescent J Med Biol Sci. 2019;6(1):46–50.

Google Scholar 

HarrisonBalonovBochudMartinMenzelOrtiz-Lopez JDMFCHGP, et al. ICRP publication 147: use of dose quantities in radiological protection. Ann ICRP. 2021;50(1):9–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

MasjediOmidiZamaniPerotaZare HRHGMH. Radiation dose and risk of exposure-induced death associated with common computed tomography procedures in Yazd Province. Eur J Radiol. 2020;126:108932.

Article  Google Scholar 

OmidiZareZamaniDalvandMasjediRazavi-Ratki RMHHSHSK, et al. Patterns and trends of population radiation exposure and projected the risk of exposure-induced death from gamma camera examinations in Yazd Province. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2021;52(4):595–605.

Article  Google Scholar 

MasjediZamaniPerotaOmidiRazaviZare HRHGREMH. Estimating the risks of exposure-induced death associated with common computed tomography procedures. Int J Radiat Res. 2022;20(1):169–75.

Article  Google Scholar 

SchultzFairleyMurphyDoss CHRLSLM. The risk of cancer from CT scans and other sources of low-dose radiation: a critical appraisal of methodologic quality. Prehospital Disaster Med. 2020;35(1):3–16.

Article  Google Scholar 

McClellan RO. Effects of ionizing radiation on reproduction and development. Reproduct Develop Toxicol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89773-0.00017-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Asiri AAM. Organ dose and radiation exposure risk: a study comparing radiation dose using two software packages. Pertanika J Sci Technol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.30.4.12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tg F. Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2005;23:5304–7.

Google Scholar 

HsiehFlohr JT. Computed tomography recent history and future perspectives. J Med Imaging. 2021;8(5):052109–052109.

Google Scholar 

MuhammadAbdul KarimAbu HassanAhmad KamarudinDing WongNg NAMKHMJHKH. Diagnostic reference level of radiation dose and image quality among paediatric CT scans in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Diagnostics. 2020;10(8):591–605.

Article  Google Scholar 

ZamaniMasjediOmidiHosein HHRZM. Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for common procedures of computed tomography in Yazd province. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020;188(2):222–31.

Article  Google Scholar 

Goldman LW. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35(4):213–25.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ChristnerKoflerMcCollough JAJMCH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting international commission on radiological protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(4):881–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Manninen AL. Clinical applications of radiophotoluminescence (RPL) dosimetry in evaluation of patient radiation exposure in radiology: determination of absorbed and effective dose. ISBN 978–952–62–0624–0 (pdf). University of Oulu; 2014.

AndradeBorrasKhouryDiasBarros MEACHJSKVSM. Organ doses and risks of computed tomography examinations in Recife. Brazil J Radiol Prot. 2012;32(3):251–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

ImaokaNishimuraIizukaDainoTakabatakeOkamoto TMDKTM, et al. Radiation-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rodent models: what’s different from chemical carcinogenesis? J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 2009;50(4):281–93.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abbott A. Researchers pin down risks of low-dose radiation. Nature. 2015;523(7558):17–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

TubianaAurengoAverbeckMasse MADR. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose–effect relationship. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2006;44(4):245–51.

Article  Google Scholar 

BrennerDollGoodheadHallLandLittle DJRDTEJCEJB, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(24):13761–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

BrennerSachs DJRK. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2006;44(4):253–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Valentin J. Contents, preface, executive summary, chapters 1 and 2. Ann ICRP. 2005;35(4):1–39.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Icrp. Preface, executive summary and glossary. Ann ICRP. 2007;37(2–4):9–34.

Google Scholar 

UNSCEAR U. Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. U N. 2000.

Phase BV. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. Wash DC Br Inst Radiol. 2006.

McColloughBushbergFletcherEckel CHJTJGLJ. Answers to common questions about the use and safety of CT scans. Mayo Clinic Proceed. 2015;90:1380–92.

Article  Google Scholar 

Van Der MolenSchilhamStoopProkopGeleijns AJAPMJ. A national survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(3):383–90.

Article  Google Scholar 

De TackJahnenKohlerHarpesMaertelaerBack DASNVC, et al. Multidetector CT radiation dose optimisation in adults: short- and long-term effects of a clinical audit. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(1):169–75.

Article  Google Scholar 

PrimakMcColloughBruesewitzZhangFletcher ANCHMRJJG. Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT. Radiographics. 2006;26(6):1785–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Research JN for, Exposure (J-RIME) I on M. National diagnostic reference levels in Japan. Japan DRLs 2020. https://j-rime.qst.go.jp/report/DRL2020_Engver.pdf.

SchegererNagelStammAdamBrix AAHDGGG. Current CT practice in Germany: results and implications of a nationwide survey. Eur J Radiol. 2017;90:114–28.

Article  Google Scholar 

NajafiDeevbandAhmadiKardan MMRMMR. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels for common multi-detector computed tomography examinations in Iran. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015Dec;38(4):603–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Teferi DellieFisehaw TesfawJebessa KumsaTuri SAMTB. Local diagnostic reference levels for common adult computed tomography procedures in addis ababa. Dose-Response. 2023Apr;21(2):155932582311714.

Article  Google Scholar 

PaloriniOriggiGranataMatrangaSalerno FDCDS. Adult exposures from MDCT including multiphase studies: first Italian nationwide survey. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(2):469–83.

Article  Google Scholar 

LeeBeveridgeSanagouThomasn KLTMP. Updated Australian diagnostic reference levels for adult CT. J Med Radiat Sci. 2020;67(1):5–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

JafariKarimiKhosraviGoodarziPourkaveh SMHRM. Establishment of diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography scanning in hamadan. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020;10(6):792–800.

Google Scholar 

KanalButlerSenguptaBhargavan-ChatfieldCoombsMorin KMPFDMLPRLUS. diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT scans. Radiology. 2017;284(1):120–33.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pc S. Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK-2003 Review. NRPB-W67. 2003;14:1–103.

Google Scholar