Deistung A, Schweser F, Reichenbach JR. Overview of quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(4):e3569.

Article  Google Scholar 

Deistung A, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping differentiates between blood depositions and calcifications in patients with glioblastoma. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57924.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harada T, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: basic methods and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2022;42(4):1161–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dimov AV, et al. QSM Throughout the Body. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023;57(6):1621–40.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lin H, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping in combination with water-fat separation for simultaneous liver iron and fat fraction quantification. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(8):3494–504.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sato R, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of prostate with separate calculations for water and fat regions for reducing shading artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;66:22–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boehm C, et al. Preconditioned water-fat total field inversion: Application to spine quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2022;87(1):417–30.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jafari R, et al. Rapid automated liver quantitative susceptibility mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(3):725–32.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wen Y, et al. Cardiac quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) for heart chamber oxygenation. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79:1545–52.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Straub S, et al. Potential of quantitative susceptibility mapping for detection of prostatic calcifications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45(3):889–98.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang T, et al. Resolving phase ambiguity in dual-echo dixon imaging using a projected power method. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(5):2066–76.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pei M, et al. Algorithm for fast monoexponential fitting based on auto-regression on linear operations (ARLO) of data. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(2):843–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guo Y, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the spine using in-phase echoes to initialize inhomogeneous field and R2* for the nonconvex optimization problem of fat-water separation. NMR Biomed. 2019;32(11):e4156.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yu H, et al. Combination of complex-based and magnitude-based multiecho water-fat separation for accurate quantification of fat-fraction. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(1):199–206.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kan H, et al. Delineation of prostatic calcification using quantitative susceptibility mapping: spatial accuracy for magnetic resonance-only radiotherapy planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022;23(2): e13469.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu T, et al. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69(2):467–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdul-Rahman HS, et al. Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt. 2007;46(26):6623–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man, Cyvernetics. 1979;9(1):62–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu T, et al. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF). NMR Biomed. 2011;24(9):1129–36.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li W, et al. A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage. 2015;108:111–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bilgic B, et al. Rapid multi-orientation quantitative susceptibility mapping. Neuroimage. 2016;125:1131–41.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Szczepaniak LS, et al. Bulk magnetic susceptibility effects on the assessment of intra- and extramyocellular lipids in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47(3):607–10.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Rochefort L, et al. Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(4):1003–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elkady AM, Sun H, Wilman AH. Importance of extended spatial coverage for quantitative susceptibility mapping of iron-rich deep gray matter. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34(4):574–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karsa A, Punwani S, Shmueli K. The effect of low resolution and coverage on the accuracy of susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81(3):1833–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boehm C, et al. On the water-fat in-phase assumption for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2023;89(3):1068–82.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu Z, et al. MEDI+0: morphology enabled dipole inversion with automatic uniform cerebrospinal fluid zero reference for quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2018;79(5):2795–803.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Committee Q S M C O, et al. Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: a consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group. Magn Reson Med. 2024;91(5):1834–62.

Article  Google Scholar