Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:848–60.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Devesa-Peiro A, Sebastian-Leon P, Parraga-Leo A, Pellicer A, Diaz-Gimeno P. Breaking the ageing paradigm in endometrium: endometrial gene expression related to cilia and ageing hallmarks in women over 35 years. Hum Reprod. 2022;37:762–76.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kolte AM, Westergaard D, Lidegaard Ø, Brunak S, Nielsen HS. Chance of live birth: a nationwide, registry-based cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:1065–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Menken J, Trussell J, Larsen U. Age and infertility. Science. 1986;233:1389–94.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bouzaglou A, Aubenas I, Abbou H, Rouanet S, Carbonnel M, Pirtea P, et al. Pregnancy at 40 years old and above: obstetrical, fetal, and neonatal outcomes is age an independent risk factor for those complications? Front Med. 2020;7:208.

Article  Google Scholar 

Claramonte Nieto M, Meler Barrabes E, Garcia Martínez S, Gutiérrez Prat M, Serra ZB. Impact of aging on obstetric outcomes: defining advanced maternal age in Barcelona. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:342.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Frick AP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;70:92–100.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Vaiarelli A, Ubaldi N, Ubaldi FM, Rienzi L. Impact of Maternal Age on Oocyte and Embryo Competence. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:327.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ferreira AF, Soares M, Almeida-Santos T, Ramalho-Santos J, Sousa AP. Aging and oocyte competence: a molecular cell perspective. WIREs Mech Dis. 2023;15(5):e1613.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang L-S, Lee M-S, Cheng E-H, Lee T-H, Liu C-H, Lee M-C, et al. Recipient age and pulsatility index affect uterine receptivity in oocyte donation programmes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:94–100.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Busnelli A, Reschini M, Cardellicchio L, Vegetti W, Somigliana E, Vercellini P. How common is real repeated implantation failure? An indirect estimate of the prevalence. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40:91–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Craciunas L, Gallos I, Chu J, Bourne T, Quenby S, Brosens JJ, et al. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25:202–23.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garcia Velasco JA, Seli E. Editorial: Challenges in ART diagnostics. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32:167–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pirtea P, De Ziegler D, Tao X, Sun L, Zhan Y, Ayoubi JM, et al. Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2021;115:45–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Somigliana E, Vigano P, Busnelli A, Paffoni A, Vegetti W, Vercellini P. Repeated implantation failure at the crossroad between statistics, clinics and over-diagnosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36:32–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, Fabozzi G, Venturella R, Maggiulli R, et al. Advanced Maternal Age in IVF: Still a Challenge? The Present and the Future of Its Treatment. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee E, Zhang J. Which assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment strategy is the most clinically and cost-effective for women of advanced maternal age: a Markov model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:1197.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R115.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186:243–78.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li Z, Zhang Z, Ren Y, Wang Y, Fang J, Yue H, et al. Aging and age-related diseases: from mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Biogerontology. 2021;22:165–87.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jirillo E, Candore G, Magrone T, Caruso C. A Scientific Approach to Anti-Ageing Therapies: State of the Art. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:2637–42.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Herraiz S, Pellicer N, Romeu M, Pellicer A. Treatment potential of bone marrow-derived stem cells in women with diminished ovarian reserves and premature ovarian failure. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31:156–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Labarta E, de Los Santos MJ, Escribá MJ, Pellicer A, Herraiz S. Mitochondria as a tool for oocyte rejuvenation. Fertil Steril. 2019;111:219–26.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Polonio AM, García-Velasco JA, Herraiz S. Stem cell paracrine signaling for treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:626322.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sills ES. Ovarian recovery via autologous platelet-rich plasma: New benchmarks for condensed cytokine applications to reverse reproductive aging. Aging Med Milton NSW. 2022;5:63–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ferrari AR, Cortrezzi S, Borges E, Braga D, Souza M do CB de, Antunes R de A. Evaluation of the effects of platelet-rich plasma on follicular and endometrial growth: a literature review. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021;25:601–7.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Santamaria X, Cabanillas S, Cervelló I, Arbona C, Raga F, Ferro J, et al. Autologous cell therapy with CD133+ bone marrow-derived stem cells for refractory Asherman’s syndrome and endometrial atrophy: a pilot cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1087–96.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deryabin PI, Borodkina AV. Epigenetic clocks provide clues to the mystery of uterine ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;29:259–71.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Olesen MS, Starnawska A, Bybjerg-Grauholm J, Bielfeld AP, Agerholm I, Forman A, et al. Biological age of the endometrium using DNA methylation. Reprod Camb Engl. 2018;155:167–72.

Google Scholar 

Pathare ADS, Loid M, Saare M, Gidlöf SB, Zamani Esteki M, Acharya G, et al. Endometrial receptivity in women of advanced age: an underrated factor in infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2023;29(6):773–93.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu Y, Li M, Zhang J, Wang S. Unveiling uterine aging: much more to learn. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;86:101879.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput Vienna Austria. 2021; Available from: URL https://www.R-project.org/.

Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson je, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomized Studies in Meta-Analysis. 2000.

Aouad P, Serhal A, Dion E, Buy J-N. Documentation of normal shape and measurements of the uterine fundus at reproductive age. Acta Radiol. 2021;62:667–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Lyons JG, Bromley B. Width of the Normal Uterine Cavity in Premenopausal Women and Effect of Parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:305–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar