A usability analysis of augmented reality and haptics for surgical planning

Pratt R, Deprest J, Vercauteren T, Ourselin S, David AL (2015) Computer-assisted surgical planning and intraoperative guidance in fetal surgery: a systematic review. Prenat Diagn 35(12):1159–1166

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sutherland J, Belec J, Sheikh A, Chepelev L, Althobaity W, Chow BJ, Mitsouras D, Christensen A, Rybicki FJ, La Russa DJ (2019) Applying modern virtual and augmented reality technologies to medical images and models. J Digit Imaging 32:38–53

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Drouin S, Giovanni DAD, Kersten-Oertel M, Collins DL (2020) Interaction driven enhancement of depth perception in angiographic volumes. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr 26(6):2247–2257

Article  Google Scholar 

Tournier J-D, Smith R, Raffelt D, Tabbara R, Dhollander T, Pietsch M, Christiaens D, Jeurissen B, Yeh C-H, Connelly A (2019) Mrtrix3: a fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. NeuroImage 202:116137

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yeo CT, MacDonald A, Ungi T, Lasso A, Jalink D, Zevin B, Fichtinger G, Nanji S (2018) Utility of 3d reconstruction of 2d liver computed tomography/magnetic resonance images as a surgical planning tool for residents in liver resection surgery. J Surg Educ 75(3):792–797

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, Steenberghe D (1999) Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 28(2):105–111

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Van Hemelen G, Van Genechten M, Renier L, Desmedt M, Verbruggen E, Nadjmi N (2015) Three-dimensional virtual planning in orthognathic surgery enhances the accuracy of soft tissue prediction. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 43(6):918–925

Article  Google Scholar 

Condino S, Cutolo F, Cattari N, Colangeli S, Parchi PD, Piazza R, Ruinato AD, Capanna R, Ferrari V (2021) Hybrid simulation and planning platform for cryosurgery with microsoft hololens. Sensors 21(13):4450

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Amini S, Kersten-Oertel M (2019) Augmented reality mastectomy surgical planning prototype using the hololens template for healthcare technology letters. Healthc Technol Lett 6(6):261–265

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Medellín-Castillo HI, Govea-Valladares EH, Pérez-Guerrero C, Gil-Valladares J, Lim T, Ritchie JM (2016) The evaluation of a novel haptic-enabled virtual reality approach for computer-aided cephalometry. Comput Methods Progr Biomed 130:46–53

Article  Google Scholar 

Zaragoza-Siqueiros J, Medellin-Castillo HI, Garza-Camargo H, Lim T, Ritchie JM (2019) An integrated haptic-enabled virtual reality system for orthognathic surgery planning. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 22(5):499–517

Article  Google Scholar 

Li Z, Kiiveri M, Rantala J, Raisamo R (2021) Evaluation of haptic virtual reality user interfaces for medical marking on 3d models. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 147:102561

Article  Google Scholar 

Allgaier M, Chheang V, Saalfeld P, Apilla V, Huber T, Huettl F, Neyazi B, Sandalcioglu IE, Hansen C, Preim B, Saalfeld S (2022) A comparison of input devices for precise interaction tasks in VR-based surgical planning and training. Comput Biol Med 145:105429

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bach B, Sicat R, Beyer J, Cordeil M, Pfister H (2017) The hologram in my hand: how effective is interactive exploration of 3d visualizations in immersive tangible augmented reality? IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr 24(1):457–467

Article  Google Scholar 

González AV, Koh S, Kapalo K, Sottilare R, Garrity P, Billinghurst M, LaViola J (2019) A comparison of desktop and augmented reality scenario based training authoring tools. In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp 339–350. IEEE

Erra U, Malandrino D, Pepe L (2019) Virtual reality interfaces for interacting with three-dimensional graphs. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 35(1):75–88

Article  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif