Hoffmann J, Cornelius CP, Groten M, Pröbster L, Pfannenberg C, Schwenzer N (1998) Orbital reconstruction with individually copy-milled ceramic implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 101(3):604–612

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Manolidis S, Weeks BH, Kirby M, Scarlett M, Hollier L (2002) Classification and surgical management of orbital fractures: experience with 111 orbital reconstructions. J Craniofac Surg 13(6):726–737

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schön R, Teschner M, Gellrich NC, Schmelzeisen R, Gutwald R (2007) Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 104(4):e1–e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.04.015

Article  Google Scholar 

Lüthi M, Gerig T, Jud C, Vetter T (2017) Gaussian process morphable models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 40(8):1860–1873. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2739743

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fuessinger MA, Schwarz S, Cornelius CP, Metzger MC, Ellis E, Probst F, Semper-Hogg W, Gass M, Schlager S (2018) Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13:519–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1674-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fuessinger MA, Schwarz S, Neubauer J, Cornelius CP, Gass M, Poxleitner P, Zimmerer R, Metzger MC, Schlager S (2019) Virtual reconstruction of bilateral midfacial defects by using statistical shape modeling. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 47(7):1054–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.027

Article  Google Scholar 

Scalismo—Scalable Image Analysis and Shape Modelling. https://github.com/unibas-gravis/scalismo. Accessed: 2023-05-19

Craniomaxillofacial Planning: Unique software tools for unique cases. https://www.brainlab.com/surgery-products/digital-cmf-surgery/cmf-planning/. Accessed 17 May 2023

Materialise 3-matic. https://www.materialise.com/en/healthcare/mimics-innovation-suite/3-matic. Accessed 16 May 2023

Gower JC (1975) Generalized procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40:33–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291478

Article  Google Scholar 

Lüthi M, Jud C, Vetter T (2013) A unified approach to shape model fitting and non-rigid registration. In Machine Learning in Medical Imaging: 4th International Workshop, MLMI 2013, Nagoya, Japan, September 22, 2013. Proceedings 4 (pp. 66–73). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02267-3_9

Dölz J, Gerig T, Lüthi M, Harbrecht H, Vetter T (2019) Error-controlled model approximation for gaussian process morphable models. J Math Imaging Vis 61:443–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-018-0854-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Albrecht T, Lüthi M, Gerig T, Vetter T (2013) Posterior shape models. Med Image Anal 17(8):959–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2013.05.010

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bishop CM, Nasrabadi NM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning (Vol. 4, No. 4). New York: Springer

Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) Method for registration of 3-D shapes. In Sensor fusion IV: control paradigms and data structures (Vol. 1611, pp. 586–606). Spie. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.57955

Umeyama S (1991) Least-squares estimation of transformation parameters between two point patterns. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13(04):376–380. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.88573

Article  Google Scholar 

Hubert M, Debruyne M (2010) Minimum covariance determinant. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 2(1):36–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.61

Article  Google Scholar 

Slotani M (1964) Tolerance regions for a multivariate normal population. Ann Inst Stat Math 16(1):135–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02868568

Article  Google Scholar 

Lüthi M, Forster A, Gerig T, Vetter T (2017) Shape modeling using gaussian process morphable models. In Statistical shape and deformation analysis (pp. 165–191). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810493-4.00008-0

Styner MA, Rajamani KT, Nolte LP, Zsemlye G, Székely G, Taylor CJ, Davies RH (2003) Evaluation of 3D correspondence methods for model building. IPMI 2003, Ambleside, UK, July 20–25, 2003. Proceedings 18 (pp. 63–75). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45087-0_6

Kullback–Leibler divergence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kullback%E2%80%93Leibler_divergence. Accessed 19 May 2023

Gass M, Füßinger MA, Metzger MC, Schwarz S, Bähr JD, Brandenburg LS, Weingart J, Schlager S (2022) Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model. J Anat 240(2):323–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13550

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar