Speech Language Pathology in the Neurocritical Care Unit

Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(6):CD000425. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Norman RS, Swan AA, Jenkins A, Ballard M, Amuan M, Pugh MJ. Updating and refining prevalence rates of traumatic brain injury–related communication disorders among post-9/11 veterans: a chronic effects of neurotrauma consortium study. SIG 2 Neurogenic Communication Disorders. 2021:6(5):1060–72.

Johansen MC, Langton-Frost N, Gottesman RF. The role of cardiovascular disease in cognitive impairment. Curr Geri Rep. 2020:9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-020-00309-7.

Takizawa C, Gemmell E, Kenworthy J, Speyer R. A systematic review of the prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke, parkinson’s disease, alzheimer’s disease, head injury, and pneumonia. Dysphagia. 2016;31(3):434–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9695-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McCann MR, Hatton KW, Vsevolozhskaya OA, Fraser JF. Earlier tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with hemorrhagic stroke: associated factors and effects on hospitalization. J Neurosurg. 2019;132(1):87–93. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.7.JNS181345.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Allareddy V, Rampa S, Nalliah RP, et al. Prevalence and predictors of gastrostomy tube and tracheostomy placement in anoxic/hypoxic ischemic encephalopathic survivors of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the United States. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0132612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132612.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Angstwurm K, Vidal A, Stetefeld H, et al. Early tracheostomy is associated with shorter ventilation time and duration of ICU stay in patients with myasthenic crisis-A multicenter analysis. J Intensive Care Med. 2022;37(1):32–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066620967646.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dunn K, Rumbach A, Finch E. Language function in the acute phase following non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. J Commun Disord. 2022;96:106192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106192.

Godecke E, Hird K, Lalor EE, Rai T, Phillips MR. Very early poststroke aphasia therapy: a pilot randomized controlled efficacy trial. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(8):635–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00631.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Godecke E, Armstrong E, Rai T, Ciccone N, Rose ML, Middleton S, et al. for the VERSE Collaborative Group. A randomized control trial of intensive aphasia therapy after acute stroke: The Very Early Rehabilitation for SpEech (VERSE) study. Int J Stroke. 2021;16(5):556–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020961926.

Vitti E, Hillis AE. Treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a narrative review for stroke neurologists. Int J Stroke. 2021;16(9):1002–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211017807.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shewan CM, Kertesz A. Reliability and validity characteristics of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB). J Speech Hear Disord. 1980;45(3):308–24. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4503.308.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berube S, Nonnemacher J, Demsky C, et al. Stealing cookies in the twenty-first century: measures of spoken narrative in healthy versus speakers with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28(1S):321–9. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0131.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Edmonds LA, Mammino K, Ojeda J. Effect of verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST) in persons with aphasia: extension and replication of previous findings. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;23(2):S312–29. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0098.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Efstratiadou EA, Papathanasiou I, Holland R, Archonti A, Hilari K. A systematic review of semantic feature analysis therapy studies for aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(5):1261–78. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-16-0330.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Minkina I, Silkes JP, Bislick L, et al. The influence of phonomotor treatment on word retrieval: insights from naming errors. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(11):4080–104. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0014.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Armour M, Brady S, Sayyad A, Krieger R. Self-reported quality of life outcomes in aphasia using life participation approach values: 1-year outcomes. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2019;1(3–4):100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100025.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Garry J, Casey K, Cole TK, et al. A pilot study of eye-tracking devices in intensive care. Surgery. 2016;159(3):938–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.08.012.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Ju XX, Yang J, Liu XX. A systematic review on voiceless patients' willingness to adopt high-technology augmentative and alternative communication in intensive care units. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021;63:102948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102948. This systematic review investigated the efficacy of AAC interventions in ICU patients. The final analysis included 18 studies across 914 participants. Six studies found that high-tech AAC tools facilitated ease of communication with health care staff. Six studies also found that these tools lead to decreased anxiety and depression.

Happ MB, Baumann BM, Sawicki J, Tate JA, George EL, Barnato AE. SPEACS-2: intensive care unit “communication rounds” with speech language pathology. Geriatr Nurs. 2010;31(3):170–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2010.03.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Trotta RL, Hermann RM, Polomano RC, Happ MB. Improving nonvocal critical care patients’ ease of communication using a modified SPEACS-2 program. J Healthc Qual. 2020;42(1):e1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000163.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rose L, Sutt AL, Amaral AC, Fergusson DA, Smith OM, Dale CM. Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;10(10):CD013379. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013379.pub2.

Zahari Y, Wan Hassan WMN, Hassan MH, Mohamad Zaini RH, Abdullah B. The practice, outcome and complications of tracheostomy in traumatic brain injury patients in a neurosurgical intensive care unit: surgical versus percutaneous tracheostomy and early versus late tracheostomy. Malays J Med Sci. 2022;29(3):68–79. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2022.29.3.7.

Mccredie VA, Alali AS, Scales DC, Adhikari NKJ, Rubenfeld GD, Cuthbertson BH, et al. Effect of early versus late tracheostomy or prolonged intubation in critically ill patients with acute brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2017;26(1):14–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-016-0297-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bösel J, Niesen W, Salih F, et al. Effect of early vs standard approach to tracheostomy on functional outcome at 6 months among patients with severe stroke receiving mechanical ventilation: the SETPOINT2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(19):1899–909. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.4798.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Davis S, Weyh AM, Salman SO, Madbak F, Fraker JT. Speech pathology services are integral, but underutilized in tracheostomy rehabilitation. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2021;14(2):110–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520948381. This case series examined the use of SLPs in rehabilitation of tracheostomy. The authors determined that the mean time lag from tracheostomy to first SLP encounter was 5.9 ± 8.0 days. The study also demonstrated an improvement in decannulation following SLP utilization.

Hess DR. Facilitating speech in the patient with a tracheostomy. Respir Care. 2005;50(4):519–25.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hernandez G, Pedrosa A, Ortiz R, Cruz Accuaroni MDM, Cuena R, Vaquero Collado C, et al. The effects of increasing effective airway diameter on weaning from mechanical ventilation in tracheostomized patients: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(6):1063–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2870-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Amathieu R, Sauvat S, Reynaud P, et al. Influence of the cuff pressure on the swallowing reflex in tracheostomized intensive care unit patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(4):578–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes210.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lian S, Teng L, Mao Z, Jiang H. Clinical utility and future direction of speaking valve: a review. Front Surg. 2022;9:913147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.913147.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sutt AL, Caruana LR, Dunster KR, Cornwell PL, Anstey CM, Fraser JF. Speaking valves in tracheostomised ICU patients weaning off mechanical ventilation—do they facilitate lung recruitment? Crit Care. 2016;20:91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1249-x.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Suiter DM, McCullough GH, Powell PW. Effects of cuff deflation and one-way tracheostomy speaking valve placement on swallow physiology. Dysphagia. 2003;18(4):284–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-003-0022-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sutt AL, Cornwell P, Mullany D, Kinneally T, Fraser JF. The use of tracheostomy speaking valves in mechanically ventilated patients results in improved communication and does not prolong ventilation time in cardiothoracic intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2015;30(3):491–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Martin KA, Cole TDK, Percha CM, Asanuma N, Mattare K, Hager DN, et al. Standard versus accelerated speaking valve placement after percutaneous tracheostomy: a randomized controlled feasibility study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(10):1693–701. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202010-1282OC. This trial compared placement of a one-way speaking valve within an accelerated (median 22, interquartile range [IQR] 21–23 hours) versus standard time frame (median 45.5, IQR 43-) hours). Patients in the early speaking valve placement had a longer tolerance of speaking valve use (median 65, IQR 45–720 vs 15, IQR 3–20 mins) overall. There were no aspiration or hypoxic events in either group. This study highlights the feasibility and safety of early speaking valve placement after tracheostomy.

Giacino JT, Sherer M, Christoforou A, et al. Behavioral recovery and early decision making in patients with prolonged disturbance in consciousness after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(2):357–65. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2019.6429.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hammond FM, Giacino JT, Nakase Richardson R, et al. Disorders of consciousness due to traumatic brain injury: functional status ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(7):1136–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.5954.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gurin L, Evangelist M, Laverty P, et al. Early neurorehabilitation and recovery from disorders of consciousness after severe COVID-19. Neurocrit Care. 2022;36(2):357–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01359-1.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seel RT, Douglas J, Dennison AC, Heaner S, Farris K, Rogers C. Specialized early treatment for persons with disorders of consciousness: program components and outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(10):1908–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.052.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pape TL, Rosenow JM, Steiner M, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of familiar auditory sensory training for acute severe traumatic brain injury: a preliminary report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29(6):537–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314554626.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moattari M, Alizadeh Shirazi F, Sharifi N, Zareh N. Effects of a sensory stimulation by nurses and families on level of cognitive function, and basic cognitive sensory recovery of comatose patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized control trial. Trauma Mon. 2016;21(4):e23531. https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.23531.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif