Sandler L. One and only: The freedom of having an only child, and the joy of being one. Simon & Schuster; 2013.

Google Scholar 

Kanazawa S. Intelligence and childlessness. Soc Sci Res. 2014;48:157–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rybińska A, Morgan SP. Childless expectations and childlessness over the life course. Soc Forces. 2019;97:1571–602. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soy098.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pollard MS, Morgan SP. Emerging parental gender indifference? Sex composition of children and the third birth. Am Sociol Rev. 2002;67:600–13.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yamaguchi K, Ferguson LR. The stopping and spacing of childbirths and their birth-history predictors: Rational-choice theory and event-history analysis. Am Sociol Rev. 1995;60:272–98.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kohler H-P, Rodgers JL, Christensen K. Is fertility behavior in our genes? Findings from a Danish twin study. Popul Dev Rev. 1999;25:253–88.

Article  Google Scholar 

Murphy M, Wang D. Family-level continuities in childbearing in low-fertility societies. Eur J Popul. 2001;17:75–96.

Article  Google Scholar 

Breton D, Prioux F. The one-child family: France in the European context. Demographic Res. 2009;20:657–92. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.27.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sobotka T, Beaujouan É. Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Popul Dev Rev. 2014;40:319–419.

Article  Google Scholar 

Polit DF, Falbo T. Only children and personality development: A quantitative review. J Marriage Fam. 1987;49:309–25.

Article  Google Scholar 

Falbo T. Reason for having an only child. J Popul. 1978;1:181–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Solomon ES, Clare J, Westoff CF. Social and psychological factors affecting fertility XXXI. Fear of childlessness, desire to avoid an only child, and children’s desires for siblings. Milbank Meml Fund Q. 1956;34:160–70.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sorensen B. Only-child experience and adulthood. Palgrave; 2008.

Book  Google Scholar 

Keenan K, Barclay K, Goisis A. Health outcomes of only children across the life course: An investigation using Swedish register data. Popul Stud. . https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2021.2020886.

Falbo T, Polit DF. Quantitative review of the only child literature: Research evidence and theory development. Psychol Bull. 1986;100:176–89.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dudová R, Hašková H, Chaloupková JK. Disentangling the link between having one child and partnership trajectories: A mixed-methods life-course research. J Family Stud. 2022;28:1466–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1839534.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rowe DC. The limits of family influence: Genes, experience, and behavior. Guilford; 1994.

Google Scholar 

Cai Y, Feng W. The social and sociological consequences of China’s one-child policy. Ann Rev Sociol. 2021;47:587–606. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090220-032839.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cai H, Kwan VSY, Sedikides C. A sociocultural approach to Narcissism: The case of modern China. Eur J Pers. 2012;26:529–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.852.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cameron L, Erkal N, Gangadharan L, Meng X. Little emperors: Behavioral Impacts of China’s one-child policy. Science. 2013;339:953–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230221.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiao S, Ji G, Jing Q, Ching CC. Comparative study of behavioral qualities of only children and sibling children. Child Dev. 1986;57:357–61.

Article  Google Scholar 

Christakis NA. Blueprint: The evolutionary origins of a good society. Little, Brown Spark; 2019.

Google Scholar 

Kanazawa S. What do we do with the WEIRD problem? Evolutionary Behav Sci. 2020;14:342–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000222.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kanazawa S. Why all evolutionary psychological theories must be tested in WEIRD societies. Evolutionary Psychol Sci. 2024;10:33–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-024-00383-6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Margolis R, Myrskylä. A global perspective on happiness and fertility. Popul Dev Rev. 2011;37:29–56.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Maryanski A. WEIRD societies may be more compatible with human nature. Behav Brain Sci. 2010;33:103–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stoet G, Geary DC. The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychol Sci. 2018;29:581–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goldstein J, Lutz W, Testa MR. The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideas in Europe. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2003;22:479–96.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hagewen KJ, Morgan SP. Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Popul Dev Rev. 2005;31:507–27.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Goisis A, Chanfreau J, Moulton V, Ploubidis GB. Only children and cognitive ability in childhood: A cross-cohort analysis over 50 years in the United Kingdom. Popul Dev Rev.

Skinner BF. Science and human behavior. Free; 1953.

Google Scholar 

Margolis R, Myrskylä. Parental well-being surrounding first birth as a determinant of further parity progression. Demography. 2015;52:1147–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0413-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fullerton G, Danielian PJ, Bhattacharya S. Outcome of pregnancy following postpartum haemorrhage. BJOG. 2013;120:621–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12120.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gizzo S, Saccardi C, Patrelli TS, Di Gangi S, Breda E, Fagherazzi S, Noventa M, D’Antona D, Nardelli GB. Fertility rate and subsequent pregnancy outcomes after conservative surgical techniques in postpartum hemorrhage: 15 years of literature. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:2097–2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nizard J, Barrinque L, Frydman R, Fernandez H. Fertility and pregnancy outcomes following hypogastric artery ligation for severe post-partum haemorrhage. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:844–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang L, Bi S, Du L, Gong J, Chen J, Sun W, Shen X, Tang J, Ren L, Chai G, Wang Z, Chen D. Effect of previous placenta previa on outcome of next pregnancy: A 10-year retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02890-3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gold R, Kenney AM, Singh S. Paying for maternity care in the United States. Fam Plan Perspect. 1987;19:190–206.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Blue Cross Blue Shield. Trends in pregnancy and childbirth complications in the U. S. Blue Cross Blue Shield Associations; 2020.

Google Scholar 

Pew Research Center. (2015). Parenting in America: Outlook, worries, aspirations are strongly linked to financial situation. [https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/12/17/parenting-in-america/]

Silver RM. Abnormal placentation: Placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:654–68.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP. (2022). Births: Final data for 2020. National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 70, no. 17. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:112078

Pew Research Center. (2018). They’re waiting longer, but U.S. women today more likely to have children than a decade ago. [https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/01/18/theyre-waiting-longer-but-u-s-women-today-more-likely-to-have-children-than-a-decade-ago/]

Sunderam S, Zhang Y, Jewett A, Kissin D. State-specific assisted reproductive technology surveillance, United States: 2019 Data Brief. Atlanta: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2021.

Google Scholar 

Oberg AS, Hernandéz-Diaź S, Frissell T, Greene MF, Almqvist C, Bateman BT. Genetic contribution to postpartum haemorrhage in Swedish population: Cohort study of 466 686 births. BMJ. 2014;349:g4984. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g4984.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central