Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. 2021–22 report on the operation of the aged Care Act 1997. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2022.

Google Scholar 

Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Home Care packages Program, Data Report 4th quarter 2021-22. Canberra Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2022.

The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Interim report: neglect. Canberra Commonwealth of Australia; 2019.

The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety. Final report: care, dignity and respect- list of recommendations. Canberra Commonwealth of Australia; 2021.

Department of Health and Aged Care. (2023). National Aged Care Mandatory Quality Indicator Program (QI Program), Manual 3.01 – Part A. Retrieved 1 February 2023, 1 February 2023, from https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2022/09/national-aged-care-mandatory-quality-indicator-program-manual-3-0-part-a_0.pdf.

Caughey GE, Lang CE, Bray SCE, Sluggett JK, Whitehead C, Visvanathan R, Evans K, Corlis M, Cornell V, Barker AL, Wesselingh S, Inacio MC. Quality and safety indicators for home care recipients in Australia: development and cross-sectional analyses. BMJ Open, 2022;12(8):e063152.

PWC Australia. (2022). Development of quality indicators for in-home aged care. Retrieved 20 Feb 2023, 2023, from https://www.pwc.com.au/health/aged-care-qi/quality-indicators-for-in-home-aged-care.html.

Hutchinson C, Ratcliffe J, Cleland J, Walker R, Corlis M, Cornell V, Khadka J. (2021). The integration of mixed methods data to develop the Quality of Life- Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) measure BMC Geriatr, 21(702).

Khadka J, Ratcliffe J, Chen G, Kumaran S, Milte R, Hutchinson C, Savvas S, Batchelor F. A new measure of quality of care experience in aged care: psychometric assessment and validation of the quality of Care Experience (QCE) questionnaire. South Australia.: Flinders University; 2020.

Google Scholar 

Cleland J, Hutchinson C, McBain C, Khadka J, Milte R, Cameron I, Ratcliffe J. From the ground up: assessing the face validity of the quality of life–aged care consumers (QOL-ACC) measure with older australians. Qual Ageing Older Adults; 2023. Epub 15 Feb 2023.

Cleland J, Hutchinson C, McBain C, Walker R, Milte R, Khadka J, Ratcliffe J. Developing dimensions for a new preference-based quality of life instrument for older people receiving aged care services in the community. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(2):555–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ratcliffe J, Bourke S, Li J, Mulhern B, Hutchinson C, Khadka J, Milte R, Lancsar E. Valuing the quality-of-life aged Care consumers (QOL-ACC) instrument for Quality Assessment and economic evaluation. PharmacoEconomics. 2022;40(11):1069–79.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khadka J, Hutchinson C, Milte R, Cleland J, Muller A, Bowes N, Ratcliffe J. Assessing feasibility, construct validity, and reliability of a new aged care-specific preference-based quality of life instrument: evidence from older australians in residential aged care. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022;20(1):159.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khadka J, Ratcliffe J, Hutchinson C, Cleland J, Mulhern B, Lancsar E, Milte R. Assessing the construct validity of the quality-of-life-aged care consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(9):2849–65.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

COSMIN. (2019). COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 1 February 2023, from https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf.

Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press; 2014.

Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gerlinger C, Bamber L, Leverkus F, Schwenke C, Haberland C, Schmidt G, Endrikat J. Comparing the EQ-5D-5L utility index based on value sets of different countries: impact on the interpretation of clinical study results. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):18.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khadka J, Lang C, Ratcliffe J, Corlis M, Wesselingh S, Whitehead C, Inacio M. Trends in the utilisation of aged care services in Australia, 2008–2016. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):213.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Socio-Economic Indexes of Areas (SEIFA) 2016 Retrieved 30 April 2021, Year from https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2033.0.55.001.

Cleland J, Hutchinson C, Khadka J, Milte R, Ratcliffe J. A review of the development and application of generic preference-based instruments with the older Population. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019;17(6):781–801.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Keetharuth AD, Hussain H, Rowen D, Wailoo A. Assessing the psychometric performance of EQ-5D-5L in dementia: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022;20(1):139.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Marten O, Brand L, Greiner W. Feasibility of the EQ-5D in the elderly population: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(6):1621–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Norman R, Cronin P, Viney R. A pilot discrete choice experiment to explore preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(3):287–98.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gwet KL. Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2008;61(Pt 1):29–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fayers P, Machin D. Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. 3rd ed. UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2016.

Google Scholar 

de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geerinck A, Alekna V, Beaudart C, Bautmans I, Cooper C, De Souza Orlandi F, Konstantynowicz J, Montero-Errasquín B, Topinková E, Tsekoura M. Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL) questionnaire: an analysis of subjects from 9 validation studies. PLoS ONE, 2019;14(4):e0216065.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–60.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kennedy I. Sample size determination in Test-Retest and Cronbach Alpha reliability estimates. Br J Contemp Edu. 2022;2(1):17–29.

Article  Google Scholar 

De Vet HC, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. Cambridge University Press; 2011.

Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LA, de Vet HCW. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gwet KL. Handbook of inter-rater reliability: the definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Advanced Analytics, LLC; 2014.

Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boel A, Navarro-Compan V, van der Heijde D. Test-retest reliability of outcome measures: data from three trials in radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open, 2021;7(3).

Polit DF. Getting serious about test–retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:1713–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Norman R, Mulhern B, Lancsar E, Lorgelly P, Ratcliffe J, Street D, Viney R. The Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment Including both Duration and Dead for the development of an EQ-5D-5L value set for Australia. PharmacoEconomics. 2023;41(4):427–38.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pickard AS, Law EH, Jiang R, Pullenayegum E, Shaw JW, Xie F, Oppe M, Boye KS, Chapman RH, Gong CL, Balch A, Busschbach JJV. United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States using an International Protocol. Value Health. 2019;22(8):931–41.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Leeuwen KM, Bosmans JE, Jansen AP, Hoogendijk EO, van Tulder MW, van der Horst HE, Ostelo RW. Comparing measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L, ICECAP-O, and ASCOT in frail older adults. Value Health. 2015;18(1):35–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hörder H, Gustafsson S, Rydberg T, Skoog I, Waern M. A cross-cultural adaptation of the ICECAP-O: test–retest reliability and item relevance in Swedish 70-Year-Olds. Societies. 2016;6(4):30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Conner-Spady BL, Marshall DA, Bohm E, Dunbar MJ, Loucks L, Khudairy AA, Noseworthy TW. Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:1775–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feng Y-S, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, Buchholz I. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(3):647–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Long D, Polinder S, Bonsel GJ, Haagsma JA. Test-retest reliability of the EQ-5D-5L and the reworded QOLIBRI-OS in the general population of Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(10):2961–71.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cheng LJ, Tan RL-Y, Luo N. Measurement Properties of the EQ VAS around the Globe: a systematic review and Meta-regression analysis. Value Health. 2021;24(8):1223–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lin DY, Cheok TS, Samson AJ, Kaambwa B, Brown B, Wilson C, Kroon HM, Jaarsma RL. A longitudinal validation of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS stand-alone component utilising the Oxford hip score in the Australian hip arthroplasty population. J Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2022;6(1):71.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Leske DA, Hatt SR, Holmes JM. Test-retest reliability of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in adults with strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(4):672–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rand S, Malley J, Towers A-M, Netten A, Forder J. Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):163.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar