Shaping and shifting schemas on supervised injectable opioid treatment: findings from a cross-sectional qualitative study in two German treatment facilities

Amato L, Minozzi S, Davoli M, Vecchi S. Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(10):Cd004147.

Strang J, Volkow ND, Degenhardt L, Hickman M, Johnson K, Koob GF, et al. Opioid use disorder. Nat Reviews Disease Primers. 2020;6(1):3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bell J, Strang J. Medication treatment of opioid Use Disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2020;87(1):82–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McNair R, Monaghan M, Montgomery P. Heroin assisted treatment for key health outcomes in people with chronic heroin addictions: a context-focused systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023;247:109869.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haines M, O’Byrne P. Injectable opioid agonist treatment: an evolutionary concept analysis. Res Nurs Health. 2021;44(4):664–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roy M, Bleich S, Hillemacher T, Diamorphingestützte. Substit Fortschr Der Neurologie · Psychiatrie. 2016;84(3):164–78.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bühring P. Diamorphingestützte Substitutionsbehandlung: die tägliche spritze. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020;117(1–2):A-16-A-9.

Bundesopiumstelle. Bericht Des substitutionsregisters 2023. Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte; 2023.

Hall NY, Le L, Majmudar I, Mihalopoulos C. Barriers to accessing opioid substitution treatment for opioid use disorder: a systematic review from the client perspective. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;221:108651.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Friedmann Z, Binder A, Kinkel H-T, Kühner C, Zsolnai A, Mick I. Exploring patients’ perceptions on Injectable Opioid Agonist Treatment: influences on treatment initiation and implications for practice. Eur Addict Res. 2023:1–11.

Cioe K, Biondi BE, Easly R, Simard A, Zheng X, Springer SA. A systematic review of patients’ and providers’ perspectives of medications for treatment of opioid use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020;119:108146.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Madden E, Prevedel S, Light T, Sulzer SH. Intervention stigma toward medications for opioid use disorder: a systematic review. Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(14):2181–201.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zule WA, Desmond DP. Attitudes toward methadone maintenance: implications for HIV prevention. J Psychoact Drugs. 1998;30(1):89–97.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Schwartz RP, Kelly SM, O’Grady KE, Mitchell SG, Peterson JA, Reisinger HS, et al. Attitudes toward buprenorphine and methadone among opioid-dependent individuals. Am J Addict. 2008;17(5):396–401.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gryczynski J, Jaffe JH, Schwartz RP, Dušek KA, Gugsa N, Monroe CL, et al. Patient perspectives on choosing Buprenorphine over Methadone in an Urban, Equal-Access System. Am J Addictions. 2013;22(3):285–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Goldsmith DS, Hunt DE, Lipton DS, Strug DL. Methadone Folklore: beliefs about Side effects and their impact on treatment. Hum Organ. 1984;43(4):330–40.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hunt DE, Lipton DS, Goldsmith DS, Strug DL, Spunt B. It takes your heart: the image of methadone maintenance in the addict world and its effect on recruitment into treatment. Int J Addict. 1985;20(11–12):1751–71.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

D’Andrade RG, Strauss C. Human motives and Cultural models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.

Book  Google Scholar 

Borkman T. Experiential knowledge: a New Concept for the analysis of self-help groups. Social Service Rev. 1976;50(3):445–56.

Article  Google Scholar 

D’Andrade RG. The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.

Book  Google Scholar 

Boutyline A, Soter LK. Cultural Schemas: what they are, how to find them, and what to do once you’ve Caught one. Am Sociol Rev. 2021;86(4):728–58.

Article  Google Scholar 

D’Andrade RG. Afterword. In: Strauss C, D’Andrade RG, editors. Human motives and Cultural models. Publications of the Society for Psychological Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. pp. 225–32.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Strauss C, Quinn N. Schema theory and connectionism. In: Strauss C, Quinn N, editors. A cognitive theory of Cultural meaning. Publications of the Society for Psychological Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. pp. 48–84.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Rogers EM. The diffusion of innovations. New York: Free; 1995.

Google Scholar 

Mandler G. Mind and body: the psychology of emotion and stress. New York: Norton; 1984.

Google Scholar 

Pettigrew TF. Intergroup Contact Theory. Ann Rev Psychol. 1998;49(1):65–85.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Rothbart M, John OP. Social categorization and behavioral episodes: a cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. J Soc Issues. 1985;41:81–104.

Article  Google Scholar 

Perry BL, Felix E, Bolton M, Pullen EL, Pescosolido BA. Public Stigma and Personal networks: confronting the limitations of Unidimensional measures of Social Contact. J Health Soc Behav. 2022;63(3):428–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hilton JL, von Hippel W. Stereotypes Annu Rev Psychol. 1996;47:237–71.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;90(5):751–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Strauss C, Quinn N. Implications for a theory of culture. A cognitive theory of Cultural meaning. Publications of the Society for Psychological Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. pp. 85–8.

Book  Google Scholar 

Stroessner SJ, Plaks JE. Illusory Correlation and Stereotype Formation: Tracing the Arc of Research Over a Quarter Century. In: Moskowitz GB, editor. Cognitive Social Psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. pp. 247–59.

Chaiken S, Stangor C. Attitudes and attitude change. Ann Rev Psychol. 1987;38(1):575–630.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jacobs S, Quinn J. Cultural reproduction of mental illness stigma and stereotypes. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114552.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Norman DA. Reflections on Cognition and Parallel Distributed Processing. In: McClelland JL, Rumelhart D. E., the PDP Research Group, editors. Parallel Distributed Processing. 2. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1986.

Casson RW. Schemata in Cognitive Anthropology. Annu Rev Anthropol. 1983;12:429–62.

Article  Google Scholar 

Halloy A, Simon E, Hejoaka F. Defining patient’s experiential knowledge: who, what and how patients know. A narrative critical review. Sociology of Health & Illness; 2022.

Nimkulrat N, Groth C, Tomico O, Valle-Noronha J. Knowing together – experiential knowledge and collaboration. CoDesign. 2020;16(4):267–73.

Article  Google Scholar 

Krick E. Citizen experts in participatory governance: democratic and epistemic assets of service user involvement, local knowledge and citizen science. Curr Sociol. 2022;70(7):994–1012.

Article  Google Scholar 

Castro EM, Van Regenmortel T, Sermeus W, Vanhaecht K. Patients’ experiential knowledge and expertise in health care: a hybrid concept analysis. Social Theory Health. 2019;17(3):307–30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abel EK, Browner CH. Selective compliance with biomedical authority and the uses of experiential knowledge. In: Lock M, Kaufert P, editors. Pragmatic women and body politics. Cambridge Cambridge University; 1998. pp. 310–26.

Dings R, Tekin Ş. A philosophical exploration of experience-based expertise in mental health care. Philosophical Psychol. 2022:1–20.

Boardman FK. Experience as knowledge: disability, distillation and (reprogenetic) decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 2017;191:186–93.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tian X, Zhang S. Expert or experiential knowledge? How knowledge informs situated action in childcare practices. Soc Sci Med. 2022;307:115195.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Näslund H. Collective deliberations and hearts on fire: Experiential Knowledge among entrepreneurs and organisations in the Mental Health Service User Movement. Voluntas. 2022;33(1):201–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Epstein S. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Univ of California; 1996.

Pilnick A, Dingwall R. On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: a critical review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(8):1374–82.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haw J, Cunningham S, O’Doherty KC. Epistemic tensions between people living with asthma and healthcare professionals in clinical encounters. Soc Sci Med. 2018;208:34–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spencer KL. Transforming Patient Compliance Research in an era of Biomedicalization. J Health Soc Behav. 2018;59(2):170–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goodhew M, Stein-Parbury J, Dawson A. Consumer participation in drug treatment: a systematic review. Drugs Alcohol Today. 2019;19(2):97–112.

Article  Google Scholar 

Noorani T. Service user involvement, authority and the ‘expert-by-experience’ in mental health. J Political Power. 2013;6(1):49–68.

Article  Google Scholar 

Blume S. Search of experiential knowledge. Innovation: Eur J Social Sci Res. 2017;30(1):91–103.

Google Scholar 

Baillergeau E, Duyvendak JW. Experiential knowledge as a resource for coping with uncertainty: evidence and examples from the Netherlands. Health Risk Soc. 2016;18(7–8):407–26.

Article  Google Scholar 

Heymann O, Odum T, Norris AH, Bessett D. Selecting an abortion clinic: the role of social myths and risk perception in seeking Abortion Care. J Health Soc Behav. 2021;63(1):90–104.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mazanderani F, Locock L, Powell J. Being differently the same: the mediation of identity tensions in the sharing of illness experiences. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(4):546–53.

Article  PubMed 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif