Yadav I, Purohit SD, Singh H, Bhushan S, Yadav MK, Velpandian T, et al. Vitreous substitutes: an overview of the properties, importance, and development. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021;109:1156–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34778.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kleinberg TT, Tzekov RT, Stein L, Ravi N, Kaushal S. Vitreous substitutes: a Comprehensive Review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56:300–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.09.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chirila TV, Hong Y. The vitreous humor. Handbook of Biomaterial Properties. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1998. pp. 125–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5801-9_12.

Book  Google Scholar 

Silva AF, Alves MA, Oliveira MSN. Rheological behaviour of vitreous humour. Rheol Acta. 2017;56:377–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-017-0997-0.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Donati S, Caprani SM, Airaghi G, Vinciguerra R, Bartalena L, Testa F, et al. Vitreous substitutes: the Present and the future. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/351804.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Swindle KE, Ravi N. Recent advances in polymeric vitreous substitutes. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2007;2:255–65. https://doi.org/10.1586/17469899.2.2.255.

Article  Google Scholar 

Le Goff MM, Bishop PN. Adult vitreous structure and postnatal changes. Eye. 2008;22:1214–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mishra D, Gade S, Glover K, Sheshala R, Singh TRR. Vitreous humor: composition, characteristics and implication on Intravitreal Drug Delivery. Curr Eye Res. 2022;48:208–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2022.2119254.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nickerson CS, Karageozian HL, Park J, Kornfield JA. Internal tension: a novel hypothesis concerning the Mechanical properties of the vitreous humor. Macromol Symp. 2005;227:183–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.200550918.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Santhanam S, Liang J, Struckhoff J, Hamilton PD, Ravi N. Biomimetic hydrogel with tunable mechanical properties for vitreous substitutes. Acta Biomater. 2016;43:327–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.051.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee B, Litt M, Buchsbaum G. Rheology of the vitreous body. Part I: viscoelasticity of human vitreous. Biorheology. 1992;29:521–33. https://doi.org/10.3233/BIR-1992-295-612.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baino F. Towards an ideal biomaterial for vitreous replacement: historical overview and future trends. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:921–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.030.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vaziri K, Schwartz S, Kishor K, Flynn H. Tamponade in the surgical management of retinal detachment. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:471. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S98529.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Murtagh PJ, Stephenson KA, Rhatigan M, McElnea EM, Connell PP, Keegan DJ. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: primary reattachment rates and visual outcomes over a 4-year period. Ir J Med Sci (1971 -). 2020;189:355–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-019-02084-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barca F, Caporossi T, Rizzo S. Silicone oil: different physical proprieties and clinical applications. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/502143.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim R, Baumal C. Anterior segment complications related to vitreous substitutes. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2004;17:569–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohc.2004.06.011.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eibenberger K, Sacu S, Rezar-Dreindl S, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Georgopoulos M. Silicone oil tamponade in Rhegmatogenous Retinal detachment: functional and morphological results. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2019.1652917.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Januschowski K, Schnichels S, Hurst J, Hohenadl C, Reither C, Rickmann A, et al. Ex vivo biophysical characterization of a hydrogel-based artificial vitreous substitute. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0209217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209217.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Raia NR, Jia D, Ghezzi CE, Muthukumar M, Kaplan DL. Characterization of silk-hyaluronic acid composite hydrogels towards vitreous humor substitutes. Biomaterials. 2020;233:119729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119729.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schnichels S, Schneider N, Hohenadl C, Hurst J, Schatz A, Januschowski K, et al. Efficacy of two different thiol-modified crosslinked hyaluronate formulations as vitreous replacement compared to silicone oil in a model of retinal detachment. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0172895. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172895.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Suri S, Banerjee R. In vitro evaluation of in situ gels as short term vitreous substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;79:650–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30917.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang X, Peng Y, Yang C, Liu W, Han B. The feasibility study of an in situ marine polysaccharide-based hydrogel as the vitreous substitute. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106:1997–2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36403.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang H, Wang R, Gu Q, Zhang X. Feasibility study of Chitosan as intravitreous tamponade material. Graefe’s Archive Clin Experimental Ophthalmol. 2008;246:1097–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0813-8.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Katagiri Y, Iwasaki T, Ishikawa T, Yamakawa N, Suzuki H, Usui M. Application of Thermo-setting gel as Artificial Vitreous. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005;49:491–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-005-0255-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fernandez-Vigo J, Sabugal JF, Diaz Rey A, Concheiro A, Martinez R. Molecular weight dependence of the pharmacokinetic of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in the vitreous. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1990;6:137–42. https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.1990.6.137.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Foster WJ, Aliyar HA, Hamilton P, Ravi N. Internal osmotic pressure as a mechanism of Retinal attachment in a vitreous substitute. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2006;21:221–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911506064368.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Davis JT, Hamilton PD, Ravi N. Poly(acrylamide co-acrylic acid) for use as an in situ gelling vitreous substitute. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2017;32:528–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911516688482.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Maruoka S, Matsuura T, Kawasaki K, Okamoto M, Yoshiaki H, Kodama M, et al. Biocompatibility of Polyvinylalcohol Gel as a vitreous substitute. Curr Eye Res. 2006;31:599–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680600813854.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leone G, Consumi M, Aggravi M, Donati A, Lamponi S, Magnani A. PVA/STMP based hydrogels as potential substitutes of human vitreous. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:2491–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4092-7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lamponi S, Leone G, Consumi M, Greco G, Magnani A. In Vitro Biocompatibility of New PVA-Based hydrogels as vitreous body substitutes. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2012;23:555–75. https://doi.org/10.1163/092050611X554499.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hayashi K, Okamoto F, Hoshi S, Katashima T, Zujur DC, Li X, et al. Fast-forming hydrogel with ultralow polymeric content as an artificial vitreous body. Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:0044. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0044.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Liu Z, Liow SS, Lai SL, Alli-Shaik A, Holder GE, Parikh BH, et al. Retinal-detachment repair and vitreous-like-body reformation via a thermogelling polymer endotamponade. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3:598–610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0382-7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tram NK, Jiang P, Torres-Flores TC, Jacobs KM, Chandler HL, Swindle‐Reilly KE. A hydrogel vitreous substitute that releases antioxidant. Macromol Biosci. 2020;20:1900305. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201900305.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Dave VP, Pathengay A, Schwartz SG, Flynn HW. Endophthalmitis following pars plana vitrectomy: a literature review of incidence, causative organisms, and treatment outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:2183–8. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S71293.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cunha AM, Iglésias MM, Rocha-Sousa A, Falcão-Reis F, Falcão M. Endophthalmitis following Intravitreal Injection, cataract surgery, and vitrectomy: clinical features and visual outcomes. J Ophthalmol. 2021;2021:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9985821.

Article  Google Scholar 

Thrimawithana TR, Young S, Bunt CR, Green C, Alany RG. Drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye. Drug Discov Today. 2011;16:270–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2010.12.004.

Article  CAS