Adam GP, Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA. Semi-automated tools for systematic searches. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2345:17–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_2/COVER.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alwosheel A, van Cranenburgh S, Chorus CG. Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis. J Choice Modelling. 2018;28(July):167–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2018.07.002.

Article  Google Scholar 

ASReview LAB developers. ASReview LAB: A tool for AI-assisted systematic reviews [Software]. 2023. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3345592.

Boetje, J. (2023a). Graphical overview of the SAFE procedure for applying a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-aided systematic reviewing. (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22227199.v1

Boetje, J. (2023b). Recall plot for active learning-based screening of literature (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22227187.v1

Boetje, J. (2023c). Screening speed over time compared between active learning using the SAFE procedure and random screening. (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22227202.v1

Bloodgood, M., & Vijay-Shanker, K. (2014). A method for stopping active learning based on stabilizing predictions and the need for user-adjustable stopping. ArXiv Preprint. ArXiv:1409.5165

Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):531.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brouwer, A. M., Hofstee, L., Brand, S. van den, & Teijema, J. (2022). AI-aided Systematic Review to Create a Database with Potentially Relevant Papers on Depression , Anxiety , and Addiction.

Chai KEK, Lines RLJ, Gucciardi DF, Ng L. Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10:1–13.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen Y, Mani S, Xu H. Applying active learning to assertion classification of concepts in clinical text. J Biomed Inform. 2012;45(2):265–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2011.11.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cheng, S. H., Augustin, C., Bethel, A., Gill, D., Anzaroot, S., Brun, J., DeWilde, B., Minnich, R. C., Garside, R., & Masuda, Y. J. (2018). Using machine learning to advance synthesis and use of conservation and environmental evidence.

Cierco Jimenez R, Lee T, Rosillo N, Cordova R, Cree IA, Gonzalez A, Indave Ruiz BI. Machine learning computational tools to assist the performance of systematic reviews: A mapping review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022;22(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12874-022-01805-4/FIGURES/3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clark J, Glasziou P, del Mar C, Bannach-Brown A, Stehlik P, Scott AM. A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;121:81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cormack, G. v., & Grossman, M. R. (2016). Engineering quality and reliability in technology-assisted review. SIGIR 2016 - Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2911451.2911510

Cowie K, Rahmatullah A, Hardy N, Holub K, Kallmes K. Web-based software tools for systematic literature review in medicine: systematic search and feature analysis. MIR Med Inform. 2022;10(5):E33219. https://doi.org/10.2196/33219.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gama J, Žliobaitė I, Bifet A, Pechenizkiy M, Bouchachia A. A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 2014;46(4):1–37.

Article  Google Scholar 

Goodfellow, I, Bengio Y,  & Courville A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT press.

Haddaway NR, Grainger MJ, & Gray CT. (2021). citationchaser: an R package for forward and backward citations chasing in academic searching (0.0.3).

Hamel C, Kelly SE, Thavorn K, Rice DB, Wells GA, Hutton B. An evaluation of DistillerSR’s machine learning-based prioritization tool for title/abstract screening–impact on reviewer-relevant outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20:1–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Howard BE, Phillips J, Tandon A, Maharana A, Elmore R, Mav D, Sedykh A, Thayer K, Merrick BA, Walker V. SWIFT-Active Screener: Accelerated document screening through active learning and integrated recall estimation. Environ Int. 2020;138:105623.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kastner M, Straus SE, McKibbon KA, Goldsmith CH. The capture–mark–recapture technique can be used as a stopping rule when searching in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):149–57.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khalil H, Ameen D, Zarnegar A. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;144:22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.005.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lombaers P, de Bruin J, & van de Schoot R. (2023). Reproducibility and Data storage Checklist for Active Learning-Aided Systematic Reviews.

Marshall IJ, Kuiper J, Banner E, Wallace BC. (2017). Automating biomedical evidence synthesis: RobotReviewer. Proceedings of the Conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting, 2017;7.

Nieto González, D. M. (2021). Optimización de estrategias de búsquedas científicas médicas utilizando técnicas de inteligencia artificial. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.10554.58492

Olsson, F., & Tomanek, K. (2009). An intrinsic stopping criterion for committee-based active learning. Thirteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), 4–5 June 2009, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 138–146.

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, Moher D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Carroll C, Booth A, Wong R. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Info Libr J. 2010;27(2):114–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pellegrini M, Marsili F. Evaluating software tools to conduct systematic reviews: a feature analysis and user survey. Form@re - Open Journal per La Formazione in Rete. 2021;21(2):124140. https://doi.org/10.36253/FORM-11343.

Article  Google Scholar 

Przybyła P, Brockmeier AJ, Kontonatsios G, le Pogam M, McNaught J, von Elm E, Nolan K, Ananiadou S. Prioritising references for systematic reviews with RobotAnalyst: a user study. Res Synthesis Method. 2018;9(3):470–88.

Article  Google Scholar 

Qin X, Liu J, Wang Y, Deng K, Ma Y, Zou K, Li L, Sun X. Application of nature language processing in systematic reviews. Chin J Evid Based Med. 2021;21(6):715–20. https://doi.org/10.7507/1672-2531.202012150.

Article  Google Scholar 

Robledo S, Grisales Aguirre AM, Hughes M, & Eggers F. (2021). “Hasta la vista, baby” – will machine learning terminate human literature reviews in entrepreneurship? https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1955125

Ros, R., Bjarnason, E., & Runeson, P. (2017). A machine learning approach for semi-automated search and selection in literature studies. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 118–127.

Scott AM, Forbes C, Clark J, Carter M, Glasziou P, Munn Z. Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;138:80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.030.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Settles, B. (2009). Active learning literature survey.

Stelfox HT, Foster G, Niven D, Kirkpatrick AW, Goldsmith CH. Capture-mark-recapture to estimate the number of missed articles for systematic reviews in surgery. Am J Surg. 2013;206(3):439–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Teijema J, Hofstee L, Brouwer M, de Bruin J, Ferdinands, G de Boer J, Siso P, V van den Brand, S Bockting C, & van de Schoot R. (2022). Active learning-based Systematic reviewing using switching classification models: the case of the onset, maintenance, and relapse of depressive disorders.

Teijema JJ, Hofstee L, Brouwer M, De Bruin J, Ferdinands G, De Boer J, Vizan P, Bockting C, Bagheri A. Active learning-based systematic reviewing using switching classification models: the case of the onset, maintenance, and relapse of depressive disorders. Front Res Metrics Anal. 2023;8:1178181. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2023.1178181.

Article  Google Scholar 

Thomas, J., Graziosi, S., Brunton, J., Ghouze, Z., O’Driscoll, P., & Bond, M. (2020). EPPI-Reviewer: Advanced software for systematic reviews, maps and evidence synthesis. EPPI-Centre Software. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=2967

Tran HKV, Börstler J, bin Ali N, Unterkalmsteiner M. How good are my search strings?: reflections on using an existing review as a quasi-gold standard. Inform Soft Eng J. 2022;16(1):69–89. https://doi.org/10.37190/e-Inf220103.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tsou AY, Treadwell JR, Erinoff E, Schoelles K. Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13643-020-01324-7/FIGURES/11.

Article  Google Scholar 

van de Schoot, R. (2023). Software Overview: Machine Learning for Screening Text. GitHub repository. https://github.com/Rensvandeschoot/software-overview-machine-learning-for-screening-text. Accessed 21 Apr 2023.

van de Schoot R, de Bruin J, Schram R, Zahedi P, de Boer J, Weijdema F, Kramer B, Huijts M, Hoogerwerf M, Ferdinands G, Harkema A, Willemsen J, Ma Y, Fang Q, Hindriks S, Tummers L, Oberski DL. An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nat Mach Intell. 2021;3(2):125–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00287-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

van Haastrecht M, Sarhan I, Yigit Ozkan B, Brinkhuis M, Spruit M. SYMBALS: a systematic review methodology blending active learning and snowballing. Front Res Metr Anal. 2021;6(May):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.685591.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vlachos A. A stopping criterion for active learning. Comput Speech Lang. 2008;22(3):295–312.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wagner G, Lukyanenko R, Paré G. Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews. J Inf Technol. 2022;37(2):209–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211048201/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_02683962211048201-FIG1.JPEG.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wallace, B. C., Small, K., Brodley, C. E., Lau, J., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2012). Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center: abstrackr. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, 819–824.

Wallace BC, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Brodley C, Schmid CH. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11(1):1–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang LL, Lo K. Text mining approaches for dealing with the rapidly expanding literature on COVID-19. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22(2):781–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/BIB/BBAA296.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang Z, Nayfeh T, Tetzlaff J, O’Blenis P, Murad MH. Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227742.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Webster AJ, Kemp R. Estimating omissions from searches. Am Stat. 2013;67(2):82–9.

Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Yu Z, Kraft NA, Menzies T. Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews. Empir Softw Eng. 2018;23(6):3161–86.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yu Z, Menzies T. FAST2: an intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers. Expert Syst Appl. 2019;120:57–71.

Article  Google Scholar