Creutzfeldt CJ, Engelberg RA, Healey L, et al. Palliative care needs in the Neuro-ICU. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(8):1677–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001018.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Curtis JR, White DB. Practical guidance for evidence-based ICU family conferences. Chest. 2008;134(4):835–43. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-0235.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Curtis JR, Vincent JL. Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit. Lancet. 2010;376(9749):1347–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60143-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Halpern SD. Goal-concordant care - searching for the holy grail. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(17):1603–6. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1908153.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Creutzfeldt CJ, Holloway RG. Treatment decisions for a future self: ethical obligations to guide truly informed choices. JAMA. 2020;323(2):115–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.19652.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jones K, Quinn T, Mazor KM, Muehlschlegel S. Prognostic uncertainty in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: a multicenter qualitative study. Neurocrit Care. 2021;35(2):311–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-021-01230-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Greenberg SM, Ziai WC, Cordonnier C, et al. 2022 Guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2022;53(7):e282–361. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000407.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Busl KM, Fried H, Muehlschlegel S, et al. Guidelines for neuroprognostication in adults with guillain-barré syndrome [published correction appears in Neurocrit Care. Neurocrit Care. 2023;38(3):564–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-023-01707-3.

Rajajee V, Muehlschlegel S, Wartenberg KE, et al. Guidelines for neuroprognostication in comatose adult survivors of cardiac arrest. Neurocrit Care. 2023;38(3):533–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-023-01688-3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Becker KJ, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology. 2001;56(6):766–72. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.56.6.766.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Creutzfeldt CJ, Becker KJ, Weinstein JR, et al. Do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders and prognostic models for intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(1):158–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fb7b49.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Huijben JA, Volovici V, Cnossen MC, et al. Variation in general supportive and preventive intensive care management of traumatic brain injury: a survey in 66 neurotrauma centers participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):90. Published 2018 Apr 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2000-6.

George BP, Kelly AG, Schneider EB, Holloway RG. Current practices in feeding tube placement for US acute ischemic stroke inpatients. Neurology. 2014;83(10):874–82. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000764.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Krishnamoorthy V, Hough CL, Vavilala MS, et al. Tracheostomy after severe acute brain injury: trends and variability in the USA. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(3):546–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-019-00697-5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kelly AG, Zahuranec DB, Holloway RG, Morgenstern LB, Burke JF. Variation in do-not-resuscitate orders for patients with ischemic stroke: implications for national hospital comparisons. Stroke. 2014;45(3):822–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004573.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Quill TE, Holloway R. Time-limited trials near the end of life. JAMA. 2011;306(13):1483–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1413.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

VanKerkhoff TD, Viglianti EM, Detsky ME, Kruser JM. Time-limited trials in the intensive care unit to promote goal-concordant patient care. Clin Pulm Med. 2019;26(5):141–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/cpm.0000000000000323.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Leiter RE, Tulsky JA. Time-limited trials and potentially nonbeneficial treatment in the ICU-willing to wait for it. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(6):795–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.0988.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Chang DW, Neville TH, Parrish J, et al. Evaluation of time-limited trials among critically ill patients with advanced medical illnesses and reduction of nonbeneficial ICU treatments. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(6):786–794. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1000. A prospective quality improvement study aiming to evaluate if time-limited trials for patients in the medical intensive care unit was associated with decreased length of stay in the ICU and usage of certain therapies. The use of time-limited trials was associated with less frequent invasive procedures, shorter length of stay in the ICU, and more family meetings that included discourse regarding risk and benefits of treatment options, eliciting of patient values, and establishing signs of clinical improvement.

Bruce CR, Liang C, Blumenthal-Barby JS, et al. Barriers and facilitators to initiating and completing time-limited trials in critical care. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(12):2535–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001307.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Viglianti EM, Ervin JN, Newton CA, Kruser JM, Iwashyna TJ, Valley TS. Time-limited trials in the ICU: a mixed-methods sequential explanatory study of intensivists at two academic centres. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4):e059325. Published 2022 Apr 4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059325.

• Kiker WA, Voumard RR, Plinke W, Longstreth WT Jr, Curtis JR, Creutzfeldt CJ. Prognosis predictions by families, physicians, and nurses of patients with severe acute brain injury: agreement and accuracy. Neurocrit Care. 2022;37(1):38–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01501-7. The goal of the study was to analyze the prognostic predictions regarding recovery of patients with severe acute brain injury made by families, clinicians, and nurses. Families had significantly more optimistic predictions of recovery compared to both clinicians and nurses.

• Kiker WA, Rutz Voumard R, Andrews LIB, et al. Assessment of discordance between physicians and family members regarding prognosis in patients with severe acute brain injury. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2128991. Published 2021 Oct 1. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28991. The goal of the study was to investigate prognosis discordance between clinicians and families of patients with severe acute brain injury. Discordance occurred with 61% of patients and was more common in non-white families compared to white families.

Quinn T, Moskowitz J, Khan MW, et al. What families need and physicians deliver: contrasting communication preferences between surrogate decision-makers and physicians during outcome prognostication in critically ill TBI patients. Neurocrit Care. 2017;27(2):154–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-017-0427-2.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Goss A, Ge C, Crawford S, et al. Prognostic language in critical neurologic illness: a multicenter mixed-methods study. Neurology. 2023;101(5):e558–69. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207462.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

White DB, Ernecoff N, Buddadhumaruk P, et al. Prevalence of and factors related to discordance about prognosis between physicians and surrogate decision makers of critically ill patients. JAMA. 2016;315(19):2086–94. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5351.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boyd EA, Lo B, Evans LR, et al. “It’s not just what the doctor tells me:” factors that influence surrogate decision-makers’ perceptions of prognosis. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(5):1270–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d8a217.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schwarze ML, Kehler JM, Campbell TC. Navigating high risk procedures with more than just a street map. J Palliat Med. 2013;16(10):1169–71. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2013.0221.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Taylor LJ, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM, et al. A framework to improve surgeon communication in high-stakes surgical decisions: best case/worst case. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(6):531–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5674.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schwarze ML, Zelenski A, Baggett ND, et al. Best case/worst case: ICU (COVID-19)-a tool to communicate with families of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Palliat Med Rep. 2020;1(1):3–4. Published 2020 Apr 30. https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2020.0038.

• Zimmermann CJ, Zelenski AB, Buffington A, et al. Best case/worst case for the trauma ICU: development and pilot testing of a communication tool for older adults with traumatic injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(3):542–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003281. The ‘best case/worst case’ communication tool was evaluated in a pre-post study for use with older adults in the trauma intensive care unit. Use of this tool was associated with significant improvement in end-of-life communication score and resulted in less clinicians endorsed providing false hope.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Blumenthaler AN, Robinson KA, Hodge C, et al. Communication frameworks for palliative surgical consultations: a randomized study of advanced cancer patients [published online ahead of print, 2023 Feb 21]. Ann Surg. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005823.

Kruser JM, Nabozny MJ, Steffens NM, et al. “Best case/worst case”: qualitative evaluation of a novel communication tool for difficult in-the-moment surgical decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(9):1805–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13615.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Scheunemann LP, Cunningham TV, Arnold RM, Buddadhumaruk P, White DB. How clinicians discuss critically ill patients’ preferences and values with surrogates: an empirical analysis. Crit Care Med. 2015;43(4):757–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000772.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Scheunemann LP, Ernecoff NC, Buddadhumaruk P, et al. Clinician-family communication about patients’ values and preferences in intensive care units. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(5):676–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0027.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alonso A, Dörr D, Szabo K. Critical appraisal of advance directives given by patients with fatal acute stroke: an observational cohort study. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):7. Published 2017 Feb 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0166-5.

• Rutz Voumard R, Dugger KM, Kiker WA, et al. Goal-concordant care after severe acute brain injury. Front Neurol. 2021;12:710783. Published 2021 Sep 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.710783. This study compared the goals-of-care of patients with severe acute brain injury with the treatment that they received in the intensive care unit. 88% of patients who had the goal of extending life were receiving care that was in line with this goal, while only 27% of patients who prioritized receiving care that optimized comfort and quality of life received such care.

Taylor LJ, Johnson SK, Nabozny MJ, et al. Barriers to goal-concordant care for older patients with acute surgical illness: communication patterns extrinsic to decision aids. Ann Surg. 2018;267(4):677–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002282.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ahmad SR, Tarabochia AD, Budahn L, et al. Determining goal concordant care in the intensive care unit using electronic health records. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023;65(3):e199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hwang DY, Knies AK, Mampre D, et al. Concerns of surrogate decision makers for patients with acute brain injury: a US population survey. Neurology. 2020;94(19):e2054–68. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009406.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central