Abdu, R., & Schwarz, B. (2020). Split up, but stay together: Collaboration and cooperation in mathematical problem solving. Instructional Science, 48, 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09512-7

Adams-Wiggins, K. R., Myers, M. N., & Dancis, J. S. (2020). Negotiating status hierarchies in middle school inquiry science: implications for marginal non‐participation. Instructional Science, 48, 427-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09514-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Amit, M., & Fried M. N. (2005). Authority and authority relations in mathematics education: A view from an 8th grade classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-3618-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45, 797-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1

Basu, S.J., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2009). Critical physics agency: further unraveling the intersections of subject matter knowledge, learning, and taking action. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9155-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–82). Ablex.

Google Scholar 

Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165

Article  Google Scholar 

Cai J., Hwang S., Jiang C., & Silber S. (2015). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Some answered and unanswered questions. In F. F. Singer, N. Ellerton & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Posing. Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_1

Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40539320

Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. Teachers College Press.

Damşa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508401003708381

Article  Google Scholar 

Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Dunleavy, T. (2018). High school algebra students busting the myth about mathematical smartness: Counterstories to the dominant narrative “get it quick and get it right.” Education Sciences, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020058

Dyer, E. B. (2016). Learning through teaching: An exploration of teachers’ use of everyday classroom experiences as feedback to develop responsive teaching in mathematics [Dissertation, Northwestern University]. http://gradworks.umi.com/10/16/10160667.html

Dyer, E. B., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). Instructional reasoning about interpretations of student thinking that supports responsive teaching in secondary mathematics. ZDM, 48(1–2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0740-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Ehrenfeld, N. & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2019). Intellective identities in the construction of a hybrid discourse: The case of an ultra-orthodox Jewish mathematics classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 739-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9885-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1

Article  Google Scholar 

Engle, R. A., Langer-Osuna, J. M., & de Royston, M. M. (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883979

Article  Google Scholar 

Esmonde, I. (2009). Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 1008-1043. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309332562

Article  Google Scholar 

Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288

Article  Google Scholar 

Fendel, D., Resek, D., Alper, L., & Fraser, S. (2011). Interactive Mathematics Program: Integrated High School Mathematics, Year 3 (2nd edition). Key Curriculum Press.

Fendel, D., Resek, D., Alper, L., & Fraser, S. (2012). Interactive Mathematics Program: Integrated High School Mathematics, Year 4 (2nd edition). Key Curriculum Press.

Forman, E. A., Ford, M. J. (2014). Authority and accountability in light of disciplinary practices in science. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 199-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.009

Article  Google Scholar 

Fu, G., & Clarke, A. (2020). Moving beyond the agency-structure dialectic in pre-collegiate science education: Positionality, engagement, and emergence. Studies in Science Education, 55(2), 215-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1735756

Article  Google Scholar 

González, G., & DeJarnette, A. F. (2015). Teachers’ and students’ negotiation moves when teachers scaffold group work. Cognition and Instruction, 33(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.987058

Article  Google Scholar 

Ha, H., & Kim, H. B. (2021). Framing oneself and one another as collaborative contributors in small group argumentation in a science classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 19, 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10071-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation, and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012737223465

Article  Google Scholar 

Harel, G. (2001). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and Teaching Number Theory. In C. Maher (Ed.), Journal of Mathematical Behavior (pp. 185–212). Ablex.

Headrick, L., Wiezel, A., Tarr, G., Zhang, X., Cullicott, C. E., Middleton, J. A., & Jansen, A. (2020). Engagement and affect patterns in high school mathematics classrooms that exhibit spontaneous problem posing: an exploratory framework and study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09996-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Meaney, T., Pierson Bishop, J., & Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. (2017). Highlighting heritages and building tasks: A critical analysis of mathematics classroom discourse literature. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 722–765). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Google Scholar 

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834

Article  Google Scholar 

Keifert, D., & Stevens, R. (2019). Inquiry as a members’ phenomenon: Young children as competent inquirers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(2), 240–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1528448

Article  Google Scholar 

Ko, M.-L. M., & Krist, C. (2019). Opening up curricula to redistribute epistemic agency: A framework for supporting science teaching. Science Education, 103(4), 979–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21511

Article  Google Scholar 

Koichu, B., Parasha, R., & Tabach, M. (2021). Who-Is-Right tasks as a means for supporting collective looking-back practices. ZDM Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01264-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Kontorovich, I., Koichua, B., Leikinb, R., & Berman, A. (2012). An exploratory framework for handling the complexity of mathematical problem posing in small groups. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.11.002

Article  Google Scholar 

Kotsopoulos, D. (2014). The case of Mitchell’s cube: Interactive and reflexive positioning during collaborative learning in mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21, 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2013.790905

Article  Google Scholar 

Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and Its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1148529

Article  Google Scholar 

Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2017). Authority, identity, and collaborative mathematics. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 48(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.3.0237

Article  Google Scholar 

Laursen, S.L., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: Inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00085-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Lerman, S. (2012). Agency and identity: Mathematics teachers’ stories of overcoming disadvantage. In T.-Y. Tso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 99–106). Taipei: PME.

Lo, M. & Ruef, J. (2020). Student or teacher? A look at how students facilitate public sensemaking during collaborative groupwork. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 13(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v13i1a372

Louie, N. (2020). Agency discourse and the reproduction of hierarchy in mathematics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 38(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664

Article  Google Scholar 

Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2008). The value of exploratory talk. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.) Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the work of Douglas Barnes, (pp. 55–71). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279526.n4

Miller, E., Manz, E., Russ, R., Stroupe, D., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room: Epistemic agency and the next generation science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1053-1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21459

Article  Google Scholar 

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Author.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Authors.

Piaget, J. (1948/1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman Publishers.

Regier, P., & Savic, M. (2020). How teaching to foster mathematical creativity may impact student self-efficacy for proving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57, Article 100720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100720

Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem-solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_2

Article  Google Scholar 

Schindler, M., & Bakker, A. (2020). Affective field during collaborative problem posing and problem solving: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105, 303-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09973-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Shim, S. Y., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Framing negotiation: Dynamics of epistemological and positional framing in small groups during scientific modeling. Science Education, 102, 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21306

Article  Google Scholar 

Smith, E., & Confrey, J. (1991, April). Understanding collaborative learning: Small group work on contextual problems using a multi-representational software tool. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, Inc.

Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112

Article  Google Scholar 

van de Sande, C. C., & Greeno, J. G. (2012). Achieving alignment of perspectival framings in problem-solving discourse. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639000

Article  Google Scholar 

Vogel, R. (2013). Mathematical situations of play and exploration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(2), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9504-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001

Webb, N. (1982). Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology,74(4), 475-484. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.475

Article