Analyzing Teacher-Designed Tasks Through the Lens of Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge

Cartier, J. L., Smith, M. S., Stein, M. K., & Ross, D. K. (2013). 5 Practices for Orchestrating Productive Task-based Discussions in Science. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Chinnappan, M., & Forrester, T. (2014). Generating procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions by pre-service teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 871–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0131-x

Article Google Scholar

Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., & Vigdor, J. (2007). How and why do credentials matter for student achievement (NBER, Working Paper #12828). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Book Google Scholar

Coles, A., & Brown, L. (2016). Task design for ways of working: Making distinctions in teaching and learning mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9337-4

Article Google Scholar

Eisenhart, M., Borko, H., Underhill, R., Brown, C., Jones, D., & Agard, P. (1993). Conceptual knowledge falls through the cracks: Complexities of learning to teach mathematics for understanding. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 8–40. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.24.1.0008

Article Google Scholar

Gellert, U., Becerra Hernandez, R., & Chapman, O. (2012). Research methods in mathematics teacher education. In M. A. (Ken) Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel-Kreidt, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K.-S. Leung (Eds.), Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 327–360). Springer Science & Business Media.

Chapter Google Scholar

Groth, R. E., & Bergner, J. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of mean, median, and mode. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_3

Article Google Scholar

Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., Sabra, H., & Trouche, L. (2016). Collective design of an e-textbook: Teachers’ collective documentation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9331-x

Article Google Scholar

Hannigan, A., Gill, O., & Leavy, A. M. (2013). An investigation of prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ conceptual knowledge of and attitudes towards statistics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(6), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9246-3

Article Google Scholar

Hansen, A., Mavrikis, M., & Geraniou, E. (2016). Supporting teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge of fractions through co-designing a virtual manipulative. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9344-0

Article Google Scholar

Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale.

Hiebert, J. (1986). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics. Routledge.

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers’ Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372

Article Google Scholar

Johnson, R., Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., & Leary, H. (2016). Teachers, tasks, and tensions: Lessons from a research–practice partnership. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9338-3

Article Google Scholar

Jung, H., & Brady, C. (2016). Roles of a teacher and researcher during in situ professional development around the implementation of mathematical modeling tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9335-6

Article Google Scholar

Kieran, C. (2019). Task Design Frameworks in Mathematics Education Research: An Example of a Domain-Specific Frame for Algebra Learning with Technological Tools. In Gabriele Kaiser, Norma Presmeg (Editors). Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education, Springer, 265-288.

Chapter Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. National Academy Press.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage.

Lin, C.-Y., Becker, J., Byun, M.-R., Yang, D.-C., & Huang, T.-W. (2013). Preservice Teachers’ Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Fraction Operations: A Comparative Study of the United States and Taiwan. School Science and Mathematics, 113(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00173.x

Article Google Scholar

McDuffie, A. M., & Mather, M. (2006). Reification of instructional materials as part of the process of developing problem‐based practices in mathematics education. Teachers and Teaching, 12(4), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600600644285

Article Google Scholar

Misfeldt, M., & Zacho, L. (2016). Supporting primary-level mathematics teachers’ collaboration in designing and using technology-based scenarios. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9336-5

Article Google Scholar

Monarrez, A., & Tchoshanov, M. (2022). Unpacking teacher challenges in understanding and implementing cognitively demanding tasks in secondary school mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(8), 2026-2045.

Article Google Scholar

Nilsson, P. (2020). A Framework for Investigating Qualities of Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge in Mathematics—An Inferentialist Perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(5), 574–599. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0167

Article Google Scholar

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570500402447

Article Google Scholar

Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic framework. In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 491-512.

Rayner, V., Pitsolantis, N., & Osana, H. (2009). Mathematics anxiety in preservice teachers: Its relationship to their conceptual and procedural knowledge of fractions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 3(21), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217553

Article Google Scholar

Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M., & Star, J. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x

Article Google Scholar

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (1998). Reflections on Practice: Selecting and Creating Mathematical Tasks: From Research to Practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 344–350. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3.5.0344

Article Google Scholar

Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034943

Article Google Scholar

Star, J. R., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge: Exploring the Gap Between Knowledge Type and Knowledge Quality. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.784828

Article Google Scholar

Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing Standards-Based Math Instruction: A Casebook for Professional Development. Teachers College Press.

Sullivan, P., Knott, L., & Yang, Y. (2015). The relationships between task design, anticipated pedagogies and student learning. In A. Watson & M. Ohtani (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI Study 22 (pp. 83–114). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-19-09629-2

Tempier, F. (2016). New perspectives for didactical engineering: An example for the development of a resource for teaching decimal number system. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9333-8

Article Google Scholar

Thanheiser, E., Olanoff, D., Hillen, A., Feldman, Z., Tobias, J. M., & Welder, R. M. (2016). Reflective analysis as a tool for task redesign: The case of prospective elementary teachers solving and posing fraction comparison problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9334-7

Article Google Scholar

Wake, G., Swan, M., & Foster, C. (2016). Professional learning through the collaborative design of problem-solving lessons. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(2–3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9332-9

Article Google Scholar

Zuya, Z. (2017). Prospective teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: The case of algebra. American Journal of Research in Education, 5, 310–315. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-3-12

View original article

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE MATHEMATICS AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

留言 (0)