Becerra, A. Z., Aquina, C. T., Hayden, D. M., & Torquati, A. F. (2021). The top 100 most disruptive publications in academic surgery journals: 1954–2014. The American Journal of Surgery, 221(3), 614–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.037

Article  Google Scholar 

Becerra, A. Z., Grimes, C. E., Grunvald, M. W., Underhill, J. M., Bhama, A. R., Govekar, H. R., Saclarides, T. J., & Hayden, D. M. (2022). A new bibliometric index: The top 100 most disruptive and developmental publications in colorectal surgery journals. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 65(3), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002118

Article  Google Scholar 

Bittmann, F., Tekles, A., & Bornmann, L. (2021). Applied usage and performance of statistical matching in bibliometrics: The comparison of milestone and regular papers with multiple measurements of disruptiveness as an empirical example. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(4), 1246–1270. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00158

Article  Google Scholar 

Bornmann, L., Devarakonda, S., Tekles, A., & Chacko, G. (2020a). Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: Meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019). Scientometrics, 123(2), 1149–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03406-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Bornmann, L., Devarakonda, S., Tekles, A., & Chacko, G. (2020b). Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1242–1259. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00068

Article  Google Scholar 

Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2013). The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.12.003

Article  Google Scholar 

Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2011). Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance: The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 228–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.009

Article  Google Scholar 

Bornmann, L., & Tekles, A. (2019). Disruption index depends on length of citation window. El Profesional de La Información. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.07

Article  Google Scholar 

Bornmann, L., & Tekles, A. (2021). Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101159

Article  Google Scholar 

Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1996). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1(13), 75–76.

Google Scholar 

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.

Google Scholar 

Du, J., Tang, X., & Wu, Y. (2016). The effects of research level and article type on the differences between citation metrics and F1000 recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 3008–3021. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23548

Article  Google Scholar 

Fassin, Y. (2021). Research on Covid-19: A disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5305–5319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03989-w

Article  Google Scholar 

Freese, J., & Peterson, D. (2017). Replication in social science. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053450

Article  Google Scholar 

Funk, R. J., & Owen-Smith, J. (2017). A Dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Science, 63(3), 791–817. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366

Article  Google Scholar 

Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4060.471

Article  Google Scholar 

Heibi, I., Peroni, S., & Shotton, D. (2019). Software review: COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1213–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03217-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549

Article  Google Scholar 

Horen, S. R., Hansdorfer, M. A., Kronshtal, R., Dorafshar, A. H., & Becerra, A. Z. (2021). The most disruptive publications in craniofacial surgery (1954–2014). Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32(7), 2426–2430. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007804

Article  Google Scholar 

Huang, Y.-H., Hsu, C.-N., & Lerman, K. (2013). Identifying Transformative Scientific Research. 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2013.120

Jiang, Y., & Liu, X. (2023). A bibliometric analysis and disruptive innovation evaluation for the field of energy security. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15020969

Article  Google Scholar 

Jiang, Y., & Liu, X. (2023b). The relationship between absolute disruption index, peer review index and CNCI: A study based on virology papers. Library and Information Service, 67(3), 96–105.

Google Scholar 

Kaltenberg, M., Jaffe, A. B., & Lachman, M. E. (2023). Invention and the life course: Age differences in patenting. Research Policy, 52(1), 104629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104629

Article  Google Scholar 

Khusid, J. A., Gupta, M., Sadiq, A. S., Atallah, W. M., & Becerra, A. Z. (2021). Changing the status quo: The 100 most-disruptive papers in urology? Urology, 153, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.073

Article  Google Scholar 

Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2021). Disruption indices and their calculation using web-of-science data: Indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics? Journal of Informetrics, 15(4), 101219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101219

Article  Google Scholar 

Leydesdorff, L., Tekles, A., & Bornmann, L. (2021). A proposal to revise the disruption index. Profesional De La Informacion, 30(1), e300121. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.ene.21

Article  Google Scholar 

Li, J., Yin, Y., Fortunato, S., & Wang, D. (2019). A dataset of publication records for Nobel laureates. Scientific Data. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0033-6

Article  Google Scholar 

Liang, G., Lou, Y., & Hou, H. (2022). Revisiting the disruptive index: Evidence from the Nobel Prize-winning articles. Scientometrics, 127(10), 5721–5730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04499-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Liang, Z., Mao, J., Lu, K., & Li, G. (2021). Finding citations for PubMed: A large-scale comparison between five freely available bibliographic data sources. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9519–9542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04191-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Light, R. P., Polley, D. E., & Börner, K. (2014). Open data and open code for big science of science studies. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1535–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1238-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Lin, Y., Evans, J. A., & Wu, L. (2022). New directions in science emerge from disconnection and discord. Journal of Informetrics, 16(1), 101234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101234

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu, X., & Guo, J. (2020). Evaluation of Chinese scientific journals: Status, problems and suggestions. Acta Editologica, 32(1), 5–9.

Google Scholar 

Liu, X., Shen, Z., Liao, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). The research about the improved disruption index and its influencing factors. Library and Information Service, 64(24), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.24.010

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu, X., Shen, X., Guo, J., & Shen, L. (2021a). Application of percentile in subject area of papers in creating journal indicator of percentage rank. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 32(1), 118–124.

Google Scholar 

Liu, X., Shen, Z., Liao, Y., Zhu, M., & Yang, L. (2021b). Research on the stable time window of disruption index. Library and Information Service, 65(18), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.18.006

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu, X., Yi, B., Li, M., & Li, J. (2021c). Is interdisciplinary collaboration research more disruptive than monodisciplinary research? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.454

Article  Google Scholar 

Lyu, D., Gong, K., Ruan, X., Cheng, Y., & Li, J. (2021). Does research collaboration influence the “disruption” of articles? Evidence from Neurosciences. Scientometrics, 126(1), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03757-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Lyu, D., Ruan, X., Li, J., & Cheng, Y. (2022). Research on the relationship between the interdisciplinarity and radicalness of papers from the perspective of knowledge integration. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 41(3), 263–274.

Google Scholar 

Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2021). Correction to: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126(1), 907–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03792-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Meyer, C., Nakamura, Y., Rasor, B. J., Karim, A. S., Jewett, M. C., & Tan, C. (2021). Analysis of the innovation trend in cell-free synthetic biology. Life-Basel, 11(6), 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/life11060551

Article  Google Scholar 

Narock, T., & Wimmer, H. (2017). Linked data scientometrics in semantic e-Science. Computers & Geosciences, 100, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.12.008

Article  Google Scholar 

O’Connor, S. (2022). The san francisco declaration on research assessment (DORA) in nursing science. Nursing Science Quarterly, 35(2), 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/08943184211070602

Article  Google Scholar 

Osório, A., & Bornmann, L. (2021). On the disruptive power of small-teams research. Scientometrics, 126(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03756-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Pan, J., Wang, G., & Lu, X. (2022). “Break the four only” and “establish new standards” based on five value orientations. Chinese Science Bulletin, 67(3), 236–241.

Article  Google Scholar 

Patel, P. A., Patel, P. N., Becerra, A. Z., & Mehta, M. C. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-disruptive articles in ophthalmology. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 50(6), 690–695. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14109

Article  Google Scholar 

Ruan, X., Lyu, D., Gong, K., Cheng, Y., & Li, J. (2021). Rethinking the disruption index as a measure of scientific and technological advances. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121071

Article  Google Scholar 

Schumpeter, J. A. (1992). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Transaction Publishers.

Google Scholar 

Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2011). What’s familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.005

Article  Google Scholar 

Shotton, D. (2018). Funders should mandate open citations. Nature, 553(7687), 129–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00104-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Song, P., Feng, C., Long, C., Yang, Z., & Song, Y. (2022). Study on discovery of outstanding scientific and technological talents in specific domains based on optimized disruptive index. Journal of Intelligence, 41(5), 61–65.

Google Scholar 

Sullivan, G. A., Skertich, N. J., Gulack, B. C., Becerra, A. Z., & Shah, A. N. (2021). Shifting paradigms: The top 100 most disruptive papers in core pediatric surgery journals. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 56(8), 1263–1274.