Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W. & Liu, D. R. Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 824–844 (2020).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Frangoul, H. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing for sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 252–260 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Gillmore, J. D. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 in vivo gene editing for transthyretin amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 493–502 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Giannoukos, G. et al. UDiTaSTM, a genome editing detection method for indels and genome rearrangements. BMC Genomics 19, 212 (2018).

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Stadtmauer, E. A. et al. CRISPR-engineered T cells in patients with refractory cancer. Science. 367, eaba7365 (2020).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Webber, B. R. et al. Highly efficient multiplex human T cell engineering without double-strand breaks using Cas9 base editors. Nat. Commun. 10, 5222 (2019).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Turchiano, G. et al. Quantitative evaluation of chromosomal rearrangements in gene-edited human stem cells by CAST-Seq. Cell Stem Cell 28, 1136–1147.e5 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K. & Bradley, A. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 765–771 (2018).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Song, Y. et al. Large-fragment deletions induced by Cas9 cleavage while not in the BEs system. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 21, 523–526 (2020).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Zuccaro, M. V. et al. Allele-specific chromosome removal after Cas9 cleavage in human embryos. Cell. 183, 1650–1664.e15 (2020).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Alanis-Lobato, G. et al. Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2004832117 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Leibowitz, M. L. et al. Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing. Nat. Genet. 53, 895–905 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Enache, O. M. et al. Cas9 activates the p53 pathway and selects for p53-inactivating mutations. Nat. Genet. 52, 662–668 (2020).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Cox, D. B. T., Platt, R. J. & Zhang, F. Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges. Nat. Med. 21, 121–131 (2015).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Chapman, J. R., Taylor, M. R. G. & Boulton, S. J. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 47, 497–510 (2012).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420–424 (2016).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Nishida, K. et al. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science. 353, aaf8729 (2016).

PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Richter, M. F. et al. Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 883–891 (2020).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Newby, G. A. et al. Base editing of haematopoietic stem cells rescues sickle cell disease in mice. Nature 595, 295–302 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Koblan, L. W. et al. In vivo base editing rescues Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome in mice. Nature 589, 608–614 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Newby, G. A. & Liu, D. R. In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing. Mol. Ther. 29, 3107–3124 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Koblan, L. W. et al. Efficient C•G-to-G•C base editors developed using CRISPRi screens, target-library analysis, and machine learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1414–1425 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Kurt, I. C. et al. CRISPR C-to-G base editors for inducing targeted DNA transversions in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 41–46 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Chen, L. et al. Programmable C:G to G:C genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9-directed base excision repair proteins. Nat. Commun. 12, 1384 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Yuan, T. et al. Optimization of C-to-G base editors with sequence context preference predictable by machine learning methods. Nat. Commun. 12, 4902 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Zhao, D. et al. Glycosylase base editors enable C-to-A and C-to-G base changes. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 35–40 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 5635–5652.e29 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Nelson, J. W. et al. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 402–410 (2022).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Kim, D. Y., Moon, S. B., Ko, J.-H., Kim, Y.-S. & Kim, D. Unbiased investigation of specificities of prime editing systems in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 10576–10589 (2020).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Schene, I. F. et al. Prime editing for functional repair in patient-derived disease models. Nat. Commun. 11, 5352 (2020).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Gao, P. et al. Prime editing in mice reveals the essentiality of a single base in driving tissue-specific gene expression. Genome Biol. 22, 83 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Jin, S. et al. Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1292–1299 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Habib, O., Habib, G., Hwang, G.-H. & Bae, S. Comprehensive analysis of prime editing outcomes in human embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 1187–1197 (2022).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Liu, P. et al. Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2121 (2021).

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Liu, Y. et al. Enhancing prime editing by Csy4-mediated processing of pegRNA. Cell Res. 31, 1134–1136 (2021).