Bago, B., De Neys, W. (2019). The smart System 1: Evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 257–299.
Google Scholar | Crossref Changizi, M. (2009). The vision revolution. Benbella Books.
Google Scholar De Neys, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17, 428–433.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI De Neys, W., Rossi, S., Houdé, O. (2013). Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: Cognitive misers are no happy fools. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 269–273. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0384-5
Google Scholar | Crossref Dougal, S., Schooler, J. W. (2007). Discovery misattribution: When solving is confused with remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 577–592.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Ekroll, V. (2019). Illusions of imagery and magical experiences. i-Perception, 10, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669519865284
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Ekroll, V., Sayim, B., Van der Hallen, R., Wagemans, J. (2016). Illusory visual completion of an object’s invisible backside can make your finger feel shorter. Current Biology, 26, 1029–1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.001
Google Scholar | Crossref Ekroll, V., Sayim, B., Wagemans, J. (2013). Against better knowledge: The magical force of a modal volume completion. i-Perception, 4, 511–515. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0622sas
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Ekroll, V., Svalebjørg, M., Pirrone, A., Böhm, G., Jentschke, S., van Lier, R., Wagemans, J., Høye, A. (2021). The illusion of absence: How a common feature of magic shows can explain a class of road accidents. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00287-0
Google Scholar | Crossref Ekroll, V., Wagemans, J. (2016). Conjuring deceptions: Fooling the eye or fooling the mind? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 486–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.006
Google Scholar | Crossref Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Thinking twice: Two minds in one brain. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar Firestone, C., Scholl, B. J. (2015). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for so-called “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000965
Google Scholar | Crossref Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI Frey, D., Johnson, E. D., De Neys, W. (2018). Individual differences in conflict detection during reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 1188–1208.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Jarosz, A. F., Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref Johnson, E. D., Tubau, E., De Neys, W. (2016). The doubting System 1: Evidence for automatic substitution sensitivity. Acta Psychologica, 164, 56–64.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.
Google Scholar Kahneman, D., Frederick, S. (2005). A model of heuristic judgment. In Holyoak, K. J., Morrison, R. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 267–293). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar Kanisza, G., Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In Beck, J. (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 167–190). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar Kuhn, G., Kourkoulou, A., Leekam, S. R. (2010). How magic changes our expectations about autism. Psychological Science, 21, 1487–1493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610383435
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Kuhn, G., Land, M. F. (2006). There’s more to magic than meets the eye. Current Biology, 16, R950–R951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.012
Google Scholar | Crossref Kuhn, G., Rensink, R. A. (2016). The Vanishing Ball Illusion: A new perspective on the perception of dynamic events. Cognition, 148, 64–70.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Laukkonen, R. E., Kaveladze, B. T., Tangen, J. M., Schooler, J. W. (2020). The dark side of Eureka: Artificially induced Aha moments make facts feel true. Cognition, 196, Article 104122.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Levy, J., Pashler, H. (2001). Is dual-task slowing instruction dependent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 862–869.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Michotte, A., Thinès, G., Crabbè, G. (1991). Amodal completion of perceptual structures. In Thinès, G., Costall, A., Butterworth, G. (Eds.), Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception (pp. 140–167). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuo-spatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621–640.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Pailhès, A., Kuhn, G. (2020). The apparent action causation: Using a magician forcing technique to investigate our illusory sense of agency over the outcome of our choices. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 1784–1795. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820932916
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M. A. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 3–21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Ruthruff, E., Johnston, J. C., Van Selst, M., Whitsell, S., Remington, R. (2003). Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 280–289.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Stanovich, K. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar Thomas, C., Didierjean, A. (2016a). The ball vanishes in the air: Can we blame Representational Momentum? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23, 1810–1817. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1037-2
Google Scholar | Crossref Thomas, C., Didierjean, A. (2016b). No need for a social cue! A masked magician can also trick the audience in the vanishing ball illusion. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 78, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1036-9
Google Scholar | Crossref Thomas, C., Didierjean, A., Kuhn, G. (2018). The flushtration count illusion: Attribute substitution tricks our interpretation of a simple visual event sequence. British Journal of Psychology, 109, 850–861.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Thomas, C., Didierjean, A., Maquestiaux, F., Gygax, P. (2015). Does magic offer a cryptozoology ground for psychology? Review of General Psychology, 19, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000041
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Thompson, V. A. (2009). Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In Evans, J., Frankish, K. (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171–195). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0008
Google Scholar | Crossref Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory and Cognition, 39, 1275–1289. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
Google Scholar | Crossref Trémolière, B., De Neys, W., Bonnefon, J. F. (2012). Mortality salience and morality: Thinking about death makes people less utilitarian. Cognition, 124, 379–384.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI Van Lier, R., Ekroll, V. (2020). A conceptual playground between perception and cognition: Introduction to the special issue on amodal completion. i-Perception, 11, 1–4.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals Verschueren, N., Schaeken, W., d’Ydewalle, G. (2004). Everyday conditional reasoning with working memory preload. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1399–1404). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar Wiegmann, D. A., Shappell, S. A. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Ashgate Publishing Company.
Google Scholar