Drawing individual images benefits recognition accuracy in the Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm

Arndt, J., Reder, L. M. (2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00518-1
Google Scholar Begg, I., Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.553
Google Scholar Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193441
Google Scholar Bodner, G. E., Jamieson, R. K., Cormack, D. T., McDonald, D.-L., Bernstein, D. M. (2016). The production effect in recognition memory: Weakening strength can strengthen distinctiveness. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/cep000082
Google Scholar Bodner, G. E., Taikh, A., Fawcett, J. M. (2014). Assessing the costs and benefits of production in recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 149–154. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0485-1
Google Scholar Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00192
Google Scholar Burns, D. J. (2006). Assessing distinctiveness: Measures of item-specific and relational processes. In Hunt, R. R., Worthen, J. B. (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 109–130). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref Burns, D. J., Jenkins, C. L., Dean, E. E. (2007). Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1630–1640. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193497
Google Scholar Coane, J. H., McBride, D. M., Raulerson, B. A., Jordan, J. S. (2007). False memory in a short-term memory task. Experimental Psychology, 54, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.1.62
Google Scholar Conway, M. A., Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Modality and long-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90118-5
Google Scholar Craik, F. I. M. (2002). Levels of processing: Past, present. and future? Memory, 10, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000135
Google Scholar Craik, F. I. M., Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-X
Google Scholar Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046671
Google Scholar Dodson, C. S., Schacter, D. L. (2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196152
Google Scholar Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF3193146
Google Scholar Fernandes, M. A., Wammes, J. D., Meade, M. E. (2018). The surprisingly powerful influence of drawing on memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 302–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418755385
Google Scholar Foley, M. A., Wozniak, K. H., Gillum, A. (2006). Imagination and false memory inductions: Investigating the role of process, content and source of imaginations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1119–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1265
Google Scholar Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.120
Google Scholar Gallo, D. A. (2006). Associative illusions of memory: False memory research in DRM and related tasks. Psychology Press.
Google Scholar Gallo, D. A. (2010). False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion. Memory & Cognition, 38, 833–848. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.7.833
Google Scholar Gallo, D. A., Roberts, M. J., Seamon, J. G. (1997). Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 271–276. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209405
Google Scholar Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.5
Google Scholar Gunter, R. W., Bodner, G. E., Azad, T. (2007). Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.378/BF03193480
Google Scholar Hege, A. C. G., Dodson, C. S. (2004). Why distinctive information reduces false memories: Evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 787–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.787
Google Scholar Hockley, W. E., Cristi, C. (1996). Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information. Memory & Cognition, 24, 202–216. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF0320081
Google Scholar Huff, M. J., Aschenbrenner, A. J. (2018). Item-specific processing reduces false recognition in older and younger adults: Separating encoding and retrieval using signal detection and the diffusion model. Memory & Cognition, 46, 1287–1301. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0837-1
Google Scholar Huff, M. J., Bodner, G. E. (2013). When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031338
Google Scholar Huff, M. J., Bodner, G. E. (2014). All varieties of encoding variability are not created equal: Separating variable processing from variable tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.004
Google Scholar Huff, M. J., Bodner, G. E. (2019). Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 1493–1506. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470-21818-801427
Google Scholar Huff, M. J., Bodner, G. E., Fawcett, J. M. (2015). Effects of distinctive encoding on correct and false memory: A meta-analytic review of costs and benefits and their origins in the DRM paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 349–365.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline Huff, M. J., Bodner, G. E., Gretz, M. R. (2021). Distinctive encoding of a subset of DRM lists yields not only benefits, but also costs and spillovers. Psychological Research, 85, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01241-y
Google Scholar Huff, M. J., Di Mauro, A., Coane, J. H., O’Brien, L. M. (2021). Mapping the time course of semantic activation in mediated false memory: Immediate classification, naming, and recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 483–496.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI Hunt, R. R., Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90138-9
Google Scholar Hunt, R. R., Seta, C. E. (1984). Category size effects in recall: The roles of relational and individual item information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.3.454
Google Scholar MacLeod, C. M., Bodner, G. E. (2017). The production effect in memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 390–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417691356
Google Scholar Masson, M. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
Google Scholar McCabe, D. P., Presmanes, A. G., Robertson, C. L., Smith, A. D. (2004). Item-specific processing reduces false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196739
Google Scholar McCabe, D. P., Smith, A. D. (2002). The effect of warnings on false memories in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194324
Google Scholar McCabe, D. P., Smith, A. D. (2006). The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall. Memory, 14, 570–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/096582106006245-64
Google Scholar Meade, M. E., Klein, M. D., Fernandes, M. A. (2020). The benefit (and cost) of drawing as an encoding strategy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819869188
Google Scholar Nairne, J. S., Thompson, S. R., Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.263
Google Scholar Ozubko, J. D., Hourihan, K. L., MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Production benefits learning: The production effect endures and improves memory for text. Memory, 20, 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.699070
Google Scholar Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
Google Scholar Robinson, K. J., Roediger, H. L. (1997). Associative processes in false recall and false recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00417.x
Google Scholar Roediger, H. L., Balota, D., Watson, J. (2001). Spreading activation and arousal of false memories. In Roediger III, H. L., Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., Surprenant, A. (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 95–115). American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar | Crossref Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
Google Scholar Roediger, H. L., Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. A., Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 385–407. https://doi.org/10.3458/BF03196177
Google Scholar Roenker, D. L., Thompson, C. P., Brown, S. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031355
Google Scholar Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2611
Google Scholar Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., Kopecky, J. J., Price, C. A., Rothschild, L., Fung, N. S., Schwartz, M. A. (2002). Are false memories more difficult to forget than accurate memories? The effect of retention interval on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1054–1064. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194323
Google Scholar Slamecka, N. J., Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592
Google Scholar Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194105
Google Scholar Wammes, J. D., Meade, M. E., Fernandes, M. A. (2016). The drawing effect: Evidence for reliable and robust memory benefits in free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1752–1776. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1094494
Google Scholar Wammes, J. D., Meade, M. E., Fernandes, M. A. (2017). Learning terms and definitions: Drawing and the role of elaborative encoding. Acta Psychologica, 179, 104–113. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.actpsy.2017.07.008
Google Scholar Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2002.2864
Google Scholar

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif