National Vital Statistics Reports Volume 72, Number 1 January 31, 2023.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1395–9.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non–male factor indications: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:239–45.

Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:667–72.

Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinically assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:1246–52.

Chang J, Boulet SL, Jeng G, Flowers L, Kissin DM. Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011–2012. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:394–400.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Society for Reproductive Assisted Technology. “What is SART?” SART.org, https://www.sart.org/about-us/what-is-sart. Accessed Nov 13, 2024.

Toner JP, Coddington CC, Doody K, Van Voorhis B, Seifer DB, Ball GD, et al. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:541–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boulet SL, Mehta A, Kissin DM, Warner L, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. JAMA. 2015;313:255.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palermo G. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. The Lancet. 1992;340:17–8.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kumar N, Singh A. Trends of male factor infertility, an important cause of infertility: a review of literature. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015;8:191.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Glujovsky D, Farquhar C. Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? Fertil Steril. 2016;106:244–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glenn TL, Kotlyar AM, Seifer DB. The impact of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-male factor infertility—a critical review. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2616.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McPherson NO, Vincent AD, Pacella-Ince L, Tremellen K. Comparison of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on live birth rates in couples with non-male factor infertility and advanced maternal age. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:669–78.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hipp HS, Crawford S, Boulet S, Toner J, Sparks AAE, Kawwass JF. Trends and outcomes for preimplantation genetic testing in the United States, 2014–2018. JAMA. 2022;327:1288.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Penzias A, Bendikson K, Butts S, Coutifaris C, Falcone T, Fossum G, et al. The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:429–36.

Article  Google Scholar 

Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO, Hickok LR, Lathi RB. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1668–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Balli M, Cecchele A, Pisaturo V, Makieva S, Carullo G, Somigliana E, et al. Opportunities and limits of conventional IVF versus ICSI: it is time to come off the fence. J Clin Med. 2022;11:5722.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Palmerola KL, Vitez SF, Amrane S, Fischer CP, Forman EJ. Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:153–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feldman B, Aizer A, Brengauz M, Dotan K, Levron J, Schiff E, et al. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis—should we use ICSI for all? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:1179–83.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang N, Zhao X, Ma M, Zhu Q, Wang Y. Effect of day 3 and day 5/6 embryo quality on the reproductive outcomes in the single vitrified embryo transfer cycles. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:641623.

Article  Google Scholar 

Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, Tao X, Taylor D, Levy B, et al. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:100-107.e1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chambers GM, Ledger W. The economic implications of multiple pregnancy following ART. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:254–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scott RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:624–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simopoulou M, Sfakianoudis K, Maziotis E, Tsioulou P, Grigoriadis S, Rapani A, et al. PGT-A: who and when? Α systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:1939–57.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tiegs AW, Tao X, Zhan Y, Whitehead CV, Seli E, Patounakis G, et al. A multi-center, prospective, blinded, non-selection study evaluating the predictive value (PV) of an aneuploid diagnosis with PGT-A and the impact of biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:e30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kucherov A, Fazzari M, Lieman H, Ball GD, Doody K, Jindal S. PGT-A is associated with reduced cumulative live birth rate in first reported IVF stimulation cycles age ≤ 40: an analysis of 133,494 autologous cycles reported to SART CORS. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023;40:137–49.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neal SA, Morin SJ, Franasiak JM, Goodman LR, Juneau CR, Forman EJ, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:896–904.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Robins JC, McQueen DB. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: costly or cost effective? Fertil Steril. 2018;110:851.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Von Estorff F, Mochtar MH, Lehmann V, Van Wely M. Driving factors in treatment decision-making of patients seeking medical assistance for infertility: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2024;30:341–54.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marcus HJ, Marcus DM, Marcus SF. How do infertile couples choose their IVF centers? An Internet-based survey. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:779–81.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gunderson S, Jungheim ES, Kallen CB, Omurtag K. Public reporting of IVF outcomes influences medical decision-making and physician training. Fertil Res Pract. 2020;6:1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Doody KJ. Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology cycle outcomes is not simple. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:893–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar