Trounson AO. Cryopreservation. Br Med Bull. 1990;46(3):695–708.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(8):1685–95.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(2):344–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Le TMC, Ong PT, Nguyen QA, Roque M. Fresh versus elective frozen embryo transfer: cumulative live birth rates of 7,236 IVF cycles. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022;26(3):450–9.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Baradaran Bagheri R, Bazrafkan M, Sabour A, Ataei M, Badehnoosh B, Mashak B, et al. The comparison of pregnancy outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023;21(7):551–6.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bosdou JK, Venetis CA, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF, Kolibianakis EM. Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(3):491–505.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ferraretti AP, Nygren K, Andersen AN, de Mouzon J, Kupka M, Calhaz-Jorge C, et al. Trends over 15 years in ART in Europe: an analysis of 6 million cycles. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;2017(2):hox012.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Edgar DH, Gook DA. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):536–54.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard JP. Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol. Fertil Steril. 1985;44(5):645–51.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(3):300–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(2):139–55.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liebermann J. Vitrification: a simple and successful method for cryostorage of human blastocysts. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2180:501–15.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Rycke M, Goossens V, Kokkali G, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Coonen E, Moutou C. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIV-XV: cycles from January 2011 to December 2012 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2013. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(10):1974–94.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance. 2016. https://journals.lww.com/grh/Fulltext/2016/09000/IFFS_Surveillance_2016.1. Accessed 10/09/2024

Strom D, Feinberg EC. Embryo transfer-the who, what, when, how, and why does it matter? Fertil Steril. 2022;118(5):813–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Katler QS, Kawwass JF, Hurst BS, Sparks AE, McCulloh DH, Wantman E, et al. Vanquishing multiple pregnancy in in vitro fertilization in the United States-a 25-year endeavor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):129–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farquhar C. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in assisted reproductive technologies: transferring one embryo at a time should be the norm. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(4):671–2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Makieva S, Sachs MK, Xie M, Velasco A, El-Hadad S, Kalaitzopoulos DR, et al. Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023(4):hoad037.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, Fukumoto Y, Tokudome M, Moewaki H, et al. The effect of repeated cryopreservation and thawing using cryotip on the clinical outcomes of embryos. Reprod Med Biol. 2021;20(2):176–81.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Oraiopoulou C, Karagianni M, Papatheodorou A, Toumpa O, Papadopoulou M, Christophoridis N, et al. Double vitrification of embryos adversely affects clinical outcomes. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2024. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20240014.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hallamaa M, Seikkula J, Willman S, Ollila H, Jokimaa V. Pregnancy potential and perinatal outcomes of embryos cryopreserved twice: a case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(4):607–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farhi J, Elizur S, Yonish M, Seidman DS, Shulman A, Schiff E, et al. Assessment of a double freezing approach in the management of surplus embryos in IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(4):517–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang M, Jiang J, Xi Q, Li D, Ren X, Li Z, et al. Repeated cryopreservation process impairs embryo implantation potential but does not affect neonatal outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42(1):75–82.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koch J, Costello MF, Chapman MG, Kilani S. Twice-frozen embryos are no detriment to pregnancy success: a retrospective comparative study. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(1):58–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Murakami M, Egashira A, Murakami K, Araki Y, Kuramoto T. Perinatal outcome of twice-frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a clinical follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2648–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cimadomo D, Sosa Fernandez L, Soscia D, Fabozzi G, Benini F, Cesana A, et al. Inter-centre reliability in embryo grading across several IVF clinics is limited: implications for embryo selection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44(1):39–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taylor TH, Patrick JL, Gitlin SA, Michael Wilson J, Crain JL, Griffin DK. Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(1):59–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bradley CK, Livingstone M, Traversa MV, McArthur SJ. Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):999–1006.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aluko A, Vaughan DA, Modest AM, Penzias AS, Hacker MR, Thornton K, et al. Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;42(3):572–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cobo A, Castellò D, Vallejo B, Albert C, de los Santos JM, Remohí J. Outcome of cryotransfer of embryos developed from vitrified oocytes: double vitrification has no impact on delivery rates. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1623–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stanger J, Wong J, Conceicao J, Yovich J. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;24(3):314–20.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al Hashimi B, Linara-Demakakou E, Harvey SC, Harvey KE, Griffin DK, Ahuja K, et al. Double vitrification and warming of blastocysts does not affect pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2024;49(3):104103.

Article  PubMed