Similar risks of complications and reoperation rates in proximal femur megaprostheses for oncological and non-oncological indications

Viste A, Perry KI, Taunton MJ et al (2017) Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes. Bone Jt J 99-B:325–329. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B3.BJJ-2016-0822.R1

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Grammatopoulos G, Alvand A, Martin H et al (2016) Five-year outcome of proximal femoral endoprosthetic arthroplasty for non-tumour indications. Bone Jt J 98-B:1463–1470. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.BJJ-2016-0244.R1

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

De Martino I, D’Apolito R, Nocon AA et al (2018) Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4220-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Capanna R, Scoccianti G, Frenos F et al (2015) What was the survival of megaprostheses in lower limb reconstructions after tumor resections? Clin Orthop 473:820–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3736-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gusho CA, Clayton B, Mehta N et al (2021) Survival and outcomes of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur for primary and non-primary bone tumors: Single institutional results. J Orthop 25:145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2021.05.008

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yilmaz M, Sørensen MS, Saebye C et al (2019) Long-term results of the Global Modular Replacement System tumor prosthesis for reconstruction after limb-sparing bone resections in orthopedic oncologic conditions: Results from a national cohort. J Surg Oncol 120:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25490

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Henderson ER, O’Connor MI, Ruggieri P et al (2014) Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours. Bone Jt J 96-B:1436–1440. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34747

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC et al (1993) A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop 286:241–246

Article  Google Scholar 

Mallet J, El Kinani M, Crenn V et al (2023) French translation and validation of the cross-cultural adaptation of the MSTS functional assessment questionnaire completed after tumor surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 109:103574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103574

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fine JP, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94:496–509. https://doi.org/10.2307/2670170

Article  Google Scholar 

Toepfer A, Straßer V, Ladurner A et al (2021) Different outcomes after proximal femoral replacement in oncologic and failed revision arthroplasty patients - a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:813. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04673-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Staats K, Vertesich K, Sigmund IK et al (2020) Does a competing risk analysis show differences in the cumulative incidence of revision surgery between patients with oncologic and non-oncologic conditions after distal femur replacement? Clin Orthop 478:1062–1073. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001106

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lari A, Esmaeil A, AlSalem Y et al (2024) Comparative outcomes and failure rates of total femur replacement in oncologic and nononcologic indications. Jbjs Rev 12(e24):00022. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00022

Article  Google Scholar 

Janssen SJ, van Rein EAJ, Paulino Pereira NR et al (2016) The discrepancy between patient and clinician reported function in extremity bone metastases. Sarcoma 2016:e1014248. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1014248

Article  Google Scholar 

Colman M, Choi L, Chen A et al (2014) Proximal femoral replacement in the management of acute periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a competing risks survival analysis. J Arthroplasty 29:422–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khajuria A, Ward J, Cooper G et al (2018) Is endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur appropriate in the comorbid patient? Hip Int J Clin Exp Res Hip Pathol Ther 28:68–73. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000520

Article  Google Scholar 

Varenne Y, Corvec S, Leroy A-G et al (2021) A short-course antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with limited antibiotic resistance emergence in post-operative infection of pelvic primary bone tumor resection. Antibiot Basel Switz 10:768. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10070768

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Döring K, Vertesich K, Martelanz L et al (2021) Proximal femoral reconstruction with modular megaprostheses in non-oncological patients. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05080-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdel MP, Watts CD, Houdek MT et al (2016) Epidemiology of periprosthetic fracture of the femur in 32 644 primary total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience. Bone Jt J 98-B:461–467. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.37201

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kuitunen I, Ponkilainen VT, Uimonen MM et al (2021) Testing the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression and dealing with possible non-proportionality in total joint arthroplasty research: methodological perspectives and review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:489. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04379-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Biau DJ, Latouche A, Porcher R (2007) Competing events influence estimated survival probability: when is Kaplan-Meier analysis appropriate? Clin Orthop 462:229–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e3180986753

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maradit Kremers H, Devick KL, Larson DR et al (2021) Competing risk analysis: what does it mean and when do we need it in orthopedics research? J Arthroplasty 36:3362–3366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.015

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schuster NA, Hoogendijk EO, Kok AAL et al (2020) Ignoring competing events in the analysis of survival data may lead to biased results: a nonmathematical illustration of competing risk analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 122:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smolle MA, Friesenbichler J, Bergovec M et al (2020) How is the outcome of the Limb Preservation System™ for reconstruction of hip and knee? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 106:409–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.030

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Puchner SE, Funovics PT, Böhler C et al (2017) Oncological and surgical outcome after treatment of pelvic sarcomas. PLoS ONE 12:e0172203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172203

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schuh R, Kaider A, Windhager R, Funovics PT (2015) Does competing risk analysis give useful information about endoprosthetic survival in extremity osteosarcoma? Clin Orthop 473:900–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3703-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berger C, Larsson S, Bergh P et al (2021) The risk for complications and reoperations with the use of mega prostheses in bone reconstructions. J Orthop Surg 16:598. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02749-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) Investigators, Ghert M, Schneider P et al (2022) Comparison of prophylactic intravenous antibiotic regimens after endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower extremity bone tumors: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 8:345–353. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.6628

Article  Google Scholar 

Crenn V, Briand S, Rosset P et al (2019) Clinical and dynamometric results of hip abductor system repair by trochanteric hydroxyapatite plate with modular implant after resection of proximal femoral tumors. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 105:1319–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.08.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

García-Rey E, García-Cimbrelo E (2016) Abductor biomechanics clinically impact the total hip arthroplasty dislocation rate: a prospective long-term study. J Arthroplasty 31:484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.039

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hamadouche M, Ropars M, Rodaix C et al (2017) Five to thirteen year results of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Int Orthop 41:513–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3343-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy M-H (2017) Dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 41:535–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3363-4

Article  PubMed 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif