Post-ERCP clearance of bile duct stones: should the gallbladder be left in-situ?

Koc B et al (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 206(4):457–463

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mansour S, Kluger Y, Khuri S (2022) Primary recurrent common bile duct stones: timing of surgical intervention. J Clin Med Res 14(11):441–447

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kawai K et al (1974) Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 20(4):148–151

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Manes G et al (2019) Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 51(5):472–491

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams E et al (2017) Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 66:765–782

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bergman S et al (2010) Gallstone disease in the elderly: are older patients managed differently? Surg Endosc 25:55–61

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kivivuori A et al (2023) Wait-and-see strategy is justified after ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy in elderly patients with common biliary duct stones. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 94(3):443–447

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hill J, Martin DF, Tweedle DEF (1991) Risks of leaving the gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Br J Surg 78(5):554–557

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sugiyama M, Atomi Y (1998) Follow-up of more than 10 years after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in young patients. Br J Surg 86:917–921

Article  Google Scholar 

Bagepally BS et al (2021) Systematic review and meta-analysis of gallstone disease treatment outcomes in early cholecystectomy versus conservative management/delayed cholecystectomy. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 8:e000675

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lau JYW et al (2006) Cholecystectomy or gallbladder in situ after endoscopic sphincterotomy and bile duct stone removal in Chinese patients. Gastroenterology 130(1):96–103

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park BK (2020) Prophylactic cholecystectomy in patients with concomitant gallstones after removal of CBD stones by ERCP. Diseases of the gallbladder. Springer, Cham, pp 281–290

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Costamagna G et al (2002) Long-term follow-up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence. Endoscopy 34(4):273–279

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saito M et al (2000) Long-term outcome of endoscopic papillotomy for choledocholithiasis with cholecystolithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 51(5):540–545

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schreurs WH et al (2004) Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones leaving the gallbladder in situ: a cohort study with long-term follow-up. Dig Surg 21:60–65

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bergeron E et al (2023) Delay for cholecystectomy after common bile duct clearance with ERCP is just running after recurrent biliary event. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10423-0

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boerma D et al (2002) Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:761–765

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramírez-Giraldo C et al (2023) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in super elderly (> 90 years of age): safety and outcomes. Surg Endosc 37:5989–5998

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee CE et al (2023) Acute cholecystitis in old adults: the impact of advanced age on the clinical characteristics of the disease and on the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BMC Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02954-6

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Siddiqui AA et al (2006) Endoscopic sphincterotomy with or without cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis in high-risk surgical patients: a decision analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24:1059–1066

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsujino T et al (2007) Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone: immediate and long-term outcomes in 1000 patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(1):130–137

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cui ML, Cho JH, Kim TN (2012) Long-term follow-up study of gallbladder in situ after endoscopic common duct stone removal in Korean patients. Surg Endosc 27:1711–1716

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hacker KA, Schultz CC, Helling TS (1990) Choledochotomy for calculous disease in the elderly. Am J Surg 160(6):610–612

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prajapati R et al (2021) Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and common bile duct clearance: a prospective observational study. J Min Access Surg 18(3):438–442

Article  Google Scholar 

Salman B et al (2009) The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in cholelithiasis coexisting with choledocholithiasis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:832–836

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu K et al (2022) Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after clearance of common bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography superior? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine 101(45):e31365

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ahn KS et al (2015) Impact of preoperative ERCP on laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case-controlled study with propensity score matching. World J Surg 39:2235–2242

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gorla GPR, Augustine AJ, Madhavan SM (2014) Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Curr Surg 4(2):35–39

Google Scholar 

Friis C et al (2018) Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a systematic review. Scand J Surg 107(2):99

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif