Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci 12:257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Galloway A, Birkby WH, Kahana T, Fulginiti L (1990) Physical anthropology and the law: legal responsibilities of forensic anthropologists. Am J Phsy Anthropol 33:39–57

Article  Google Scholar 

Schofield D, Goodwin L (2007) Using graphical technology to present evidence. In: Mason S, ed. Electronic Evidence: Disclosure, Discovery and Admissibility. Butterworths London. pp. 101–121

Myers RD, Reinstein RS, Griller GM (1999) Complex scientific evidence and the jury: genes and justice. Judicature 83:150–156

Google Scholar 

Ribeiro G, Likwornik H, Chin JM (2023) Visual decision aids: improving laypeople’s understanding of forensic science evidence. J Appl Res Mem Cogn 12:230–240

Article  Google Scholar 

Ampanozi G, Zimmermann D, Hatch GM et al (2012) Format preferences of district attorneys for post-mortem medical imaging reports: understandability, cost effectiveness, and suitability for the courtroom: a questionnaire based study. Legal Med 14:116–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2011.12.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kassin SM, Dunn MA (1997) Computer-animated displays and the Jury: facilitative and prejudicial effects. Law Hum Behav 21:269–281. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024838715221

Article  Google Scholar 

Douglas KS, Lyon DR, Ogloff JR (1997) The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors’ decisions in a murder trial: probative or prejudicial? Law Hum Behav 21:485–501

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rempel E, Burke T (2024) The impact of technology on jurors’ decisions. In: Pica E, Ross D, Pozzulo J (ed) The impact of technology on the criminal justice system, 1st edn. Routlegde, London, pp 350–378

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Feigenson N (2010) Visual evidence. Psychon Bull Rev 17:149–154. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.149

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park J, Feigenson N (2013) Effects of a visual technology on mock juror decision making. Appl Cogn Psychol 27:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2900

Article  Google Scholar 

McDonald LW, Tait D, Gelb K, Rossner M, McKimmie BM (2015) Digital evidence in the jury room: the impact of mobile technology on the jury. Curr Issues Crim Justice 27:179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2015.12036040

Article  Google Scholar 

Porzionato A, Russo M, Macchi V, Aprile A, De Caro R (2018) The utility of plastinates in court: a case of firearm homicide. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 14:216–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-018-9958-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Augenstein S (2017) Case study: 3-D printing victim’s skull for a jury. Forensic Magazine. https://www.forensicmag.com/news/2017/12/case-study-3-d-printing-victims-skull-jury (accessed 19/08/2024).

Blau S, Phillips E, O’Donnell C, Markowsky G (2018) Evaluating the impact of different formats in the presentation of trauma evidence in court: a pilot study. Aust J Forensic Sci 51(6):695–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2018.1457717

Article  Google Scholar 

Errickson D, Fawcett H, Thompson TJU, Campbell A (2020) The effect of different imaging techniques for the visualisation of evidence in court on jury comprehension. Int J Legal Med 134:1451–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-019-02221-y

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Henningsen MJ, Thorlacius-Ussing L, Jensen LG et al (2023) 3D printed skulls in court — a benefit to stakeholders? Int J Legal Med 137:1865–1873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03054-6

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Martire KA, Kemp RI (2016) Considerations when designing human performance tests in the forensic sciences. Aust J Forensic Sci 50:166–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2016.1229815

Article  Google Scholar 

Matthews R, Hancock L, Briggs D (2004) Jurors’ perceptions, understanding, confidence and satisfaction in the jury system: a study in six courts. Home Office, Research, Development and Statistics Directorate London

Google Scholar 

Nance D, Morris S (2005) Juror understanding of DNA evidence: an empirical assessment of presentation formats for trace evidence with a relatively small random match probability. J Leg Stud 34:395–444

Article  Google Scholar 

Findlay M (2008) Juror comprehension and the hard case—making forensic evidence simpler. Int J Law Crime Justice 36:15–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsl.2007.07.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Schmechel RS, O’Toole TP, Easterlay C, Loftus E (2006) Beyond the Ken? Testing Jurors’ understanding of eyewitness reliability evidence. Jurimetrics 46:177–214

Google Scholar 

Wawro ML (1992) Effective presentation of experts. Litig 19:31

Google Scholar 

Imwinkelried EJ (2001) A minimalist approach to the presentation of expert testimony. Stetson L Rev 31:105

Google Scholar 

Der Meintjes–Van L (2003) The proof of the pudding: the presentation and proof of expert evidence in South Africa. J Afr Law 47:88–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0221855303001998

Article  Google Scholar 

Jakus AE (2019) Chap. 1 - an introduction to 3D printing—past, present, and future promise. In: Dipaola M, Wodajo FM (eds) 3D printing in orthopaedic surgery. Elsevier, London, pp 1–15

Google Scholar 

Simon G, Poór VS (2022) Applications of 3D printing in forensic medicine and forensic pathology. A systematic review. Annals 3D Print Med 8:100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100083

Article  Google Scholar 

Carew RM, Errickson D (2020) An overview of 3D printing in forensic science: the tangible third-dimension. J Forensic Sci 65:1752–1760. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14442

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carew RM, Morgan RM, Rando C (2019) A preliminary investigation into the accuracy of 3D modeling and 3D printing in forensic anthropology evidence reconstruction. J Forensic Sci 64:342–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13917

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carew RM, Morgan RM, Rando C (2020) Experimental assessment of the surface quality of 3D printed bones. Aust J Forensic Sci 53(5):592–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2020.1759684

Article  Google Scholar 

Carew RM, French J, Morgan RM (2021) Suitability of 3D printing cranial trauma: prospective novel applications and limitations of 3D replicas. Forensic Sci Int 4:100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2021.100218

Article  Google Scholar 

Edwards J, T. R (2018) The accuracy and applicability of 3D modeling and printing blunt force cranial injuries. J Forensic Sci 63:683–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13627

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Errickson D, Carew R, Collings A et al (2022) A survey of case studies on the use of forensic three-dimensional printing in England and Wales. Int J Legal Med 136:1605–1619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02872-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Boer H, Berger C, Blau S (2021) Providing a forensic expert opinion on the degree of force: evidentiary considerations. Biology 10:1336. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10121336

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vance B (1927) Fractures of the skull: complications and causes of death: a review of 512 necropsies and of 61 cases studied clinically. Arch Surg 14:1023–1092

Article  Google Scholar 

Matos MA, Nascimento JMd, Silva BVP (2014) Clinical and demographic study on open fractures caused by motorcycle traffic accidents. Acta Ortop Bras 22(4):214–218. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220400860

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Imwinkelried EJ (2003) Forensic science: opinions by forensic pathologists as to the cause of death. Crim Law Bull 39:87–105

Google Scholar 

Welsh E, Robertson N, Ireland L, Davies G (2020) The impact of jury service on Scottish jurors’ health and well-being. Howard J Crim Just 59:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12346

Article  Google Scholar 

Payne-James JJ, Hawkins C, Baylis S, Marsh NP (2012) Quality of photographic images provided for injury interpretation: room for improvement? Forensic Sci Med Path 8:447–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-012-9325-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Bright DA, Goodman-Delahunty J (2011) Mock juror decision making in a civil negligence trial: the impact of gruesome evidence, injury severity, and information processing route. Psychiatry Psychol L 18:439–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2010.492095

Article  Google Scholar 

Ryan TP (2013) Sample szie determination and power. Wiley, London

Book