Kitayama T, Ogawa Y, Fujii K et al (2010) Evaluation of a new experimental kit for the extraction of DNA from bones and teeth using a non-powder method. Leg Med 12:84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2009.12.004

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Latham KE, Miller JJ (2019) DNA recovery and analysis from skeletal material in modern forensic contexts. Forensic Sci Res 4:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2018.1515594

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haarkötter C, Gálvez X, Vinueza-Espinosa DC et al (2023) A comparison of five DNA extraction methods from degraded human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int 348:111730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111730

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mameli A, Piras G, Delogu G (2014) The successful recovery of Low Copy Number and degraded DNA from bones exposed to seawater suitable for Generating a DNA STR Profile. J Forensic Sci 59:470–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12323

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

SiriboonpiputtanaT,RinthachaiT,ShotivaranonJ,etal( (2018) Forensicgenetic analysis of bone remain samples. Forensic Sci Int 284:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.045

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cartozzo C, Singh B, Boone E, Simmons T (2018) Evaluation of DNA extraction methods from Waterlogged bones: a pilot study. J Forensic Sci 63(6):1830–1835. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13792Epub 2018 Apr 12. PMID: 29649350

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Finaughty et al (2023 Mar) Forensic DNA extraction methods for human hard tissue: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of technologies and sample type. Forensic Sci Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102818

PrepFilerTM (2012) PrepFilerTM BTA Automated forensic DNA extraction kits. USER GUIDE (ThermoFisher Scientific)

Harrel M, Mayes C, Gangitano D, Hughes-Stamm S, Evaluation Of A (2018) Powder- free DNA extraction method for skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci 63(6):1819–1823. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13749Epub 2018 Feb 7. PMID: 29411392

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kazuho Maeda C, Murakami M, Hara W, Irie M, Oishi C, Sasaki S, Nakamura S, Takahashi A, Takada Kazuyuki Saito, DNA identification of skeletal remains by using a new extraction kit, Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, Volume 4, Issue 1,2013, Pages e242-e243, ISSN 1875– 1768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2013.10.124. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187517681300125X)

Caloiero T, Guagliardi I (2020) Temporal variability of temperature extremes in the Sardinia Region (Italy). Hydrology 7:55. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7030055

Article  Google Scholar 

Emmons AL, Mundorff AZ, Hoeland KM et al (2022) Postmortem Skeletal Microbial Community Composition and function. Buried Hum Remains mSystems 7:e00041–e00022. https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00041-22

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ye J, Ji A, Parra E et al (2004) A simple and efficient method for extracting DNA from Old and burned bone. J Forensic Sci 49:754–759. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2003275

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

EZ1&2® (2022) DNA Investigator® Kit Handbook. Qiagen

QuantifilerTM HP, Trio DNA (2018) Quantification kits USER GUIDE (ThermoFisher Scientific) rev. H

Prinz M, Carracedo A, Mayr WR, DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG) (2007) Recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Sci International: Genet 1:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.10.003

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gusmão L, Butler JM, Carracedo A, DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG) (2006) An update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis. Forensic Sci Int 157:187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.04.002

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kling D, Tillmar AO, Egeland T (2014) Familias 3 – extensions and new functionality. Forensic Sci International: Genet 13:121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.004

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Berti A, Brisighelli F, Bosetti A et al (2011) Allele frequencies of the new European Standard Set (ESS) loci in the Italian population. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5:548–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.01.006

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Biondo R, Stefano FD (2011) Establishment of Italian national DNA database and the central laboratory: some aspects. Forensic Sci International: Genet Supplement Ser 3:e236–e237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2011.08.117

Article  Google Scholar 

Approved S (2010) SWGDAM interpretation guidelines for autosomal STR typing by forensic DNA testing laboratories

Gouveia N, Brito P, Bogas V et al (2017) The effect of different levels of degradation and DNA concentrations on the quality of genetic profiles. Forensic Sci International: Genet Supplement Ser 6:e428–e429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.151

Article  Google Scholar 

Deagle BE, Eveson JP, Jarman SN (2006) Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples – a case study on DNA in faeces. Front Zool 3:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-3-11

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alaeddini R, Walsh SJ, Abbas A (2010) Forensic implications of genetic analyses from degraded DNA—A review. Forensic Sci International: Genet 4:148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.09.007

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Hagelberg E, Bell LS, Allen T et al (1997) Analysis of ancient bone DNA: techniques and applications. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 333:399–407. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1991.0090

Article  Google Scholar 

Dent BB, Forbes SL, Stuart BH (2004) Review of human decomposition processes in soil. Env Geol 45:576–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0913-z

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Raffone C, Baeta M, Lambacher N et al (2021) Intrinsic and extrinsic factors that may influence DNA preservation in skeletal remains: a review. Forensic Sci Int 325:110859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110859

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hansen HB, Damgaard PB, Margaryan A et al (2017) Comparing ancient DNA preservation in Petrous bone and Tooth Cementum. PLoS ONE 12:e0170940. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170940

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pilli E, Vai S, Caruso MG et al (2018) Neither femur nor tooth: Petrous bone for identifying archaeological bone samples via forensic approach. Forensic Sci Int 283:144–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.023

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pinhasi R, Fernandes D, Sirak K et al (2015) Optimal ancient DNA yields from the inner ear part of the human petrous bone. PLoS ONE 10:e0129102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129102

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kawasaki T, Niikura M, Kobayashi Y (1990) Fundamental study of hydroxyapatite high-performance liquid chromatography: III. Direct experimental confirmation of the existence of two types of adsorbing surface on the hydroxyapatite crystal. J Chromatogr A 515:125–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)89307-9

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Bosshardt DD, Selvig KA (1997) Dental Cementum: the dynamic tissue covering of the root. Periodontol 2000 13:41–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00095.x

Zhao N, Wang X, Qin L et al (2016) Effect of hyaluronic acid in bone formation and its applications in dentistry. J Biomedical Mater Res Part A 104:1560–1569. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35681

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Harney É, Cheronet O, Fernandes DM et al (2021) A minimally destructive protocol for DNA extraction from ancient teeth. Genome Res 31:472–483. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.267534.120

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Townsend PR, Miegel RE, Rose RM et al (1976) Structure and function of the human patella: the role of cancellous bone. J Biomed Mater Res 10:605–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820100417

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mundorff A, Davoren JM (2014) Examination of DNA yield rates for different skeletal elements at increasing post mortem intervals. Forensic Sci Int Genet 8:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.08.001

Article