Impact of uterine displacement on T2-weighted image quality in the female pelvic MRI

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kinkel K, Forstner R, Danza FM, et al. Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European society of urogenital imaging. Eur Radiol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1309-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12611.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Togashi K, Nakai A, Sugimura K. Anatomy and physiology of the female pelvis: MR imaging revisited. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1120.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hricak H. MRI of the female pelvis: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.146.6.1115.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zaitsev M, Maclaren J, Herbst M. Motion artifacts in MRI: a complex problem with many partial solutions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24850.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zand KR, Reinhold C, Haider MA, et al. Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the pelvis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20996.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fujimoto K, Koyama T, Tamai K, et al. BLADE acquisition method improves T2-weighted MR images of the female pelvis compared with a standard fast spin-echo sequence. Eur J Radiol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsuboyama T, Takei O, Okada A, Wada K, Kuriyama K. Effect of uterine position and intrapelvic motions on the image quality of 3D T2-weighted MRI of the uterus: can short prescans predict the non-diagnostic image quality? Eur J Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109186.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lane BF, Vandermeer FQ, Oz RC, et al. Comparison of sagittal T2-weighted BLADE and fast spin-echo MRI of the female pelvis for motion artifact and lesion detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5918.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsuboyama T, Takei O, Okada A, Honda T, Kuriyama K. Comparison of HASTE with multiple signal averaging versus conventional turbo spin echo sequence: a new option for T2-weighted MRI of the female pelvis. Eur Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06686-z.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Froehlich JM, Metens T, Chilla B, et al. Should less motion sensitive T2-weighted BLADE TSE replace cartesian TSE for female pelvic MRI? Insights Imaging. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-012-0193-9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kataoka M, Kido A, Koyama T, et al. MRI of the female pelvis at 3T compared to 1.5T: evaluation on high-resolution T2-weighted and HASTE images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20842.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thirion JP. Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell’s demons. Med Image Anal. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-8415(98)80022-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vercauteren T, Pennec X, Perchant A, Ayache N. Diffeomorphic demons: efficient non-parametric image registration. Neuroimage. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.040.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mugler JP III. Optimized three-dimensional fast-spin-echo MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24542.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hecht EM, Yitta S, Lim RP, et al. Preliminary clinical experience at 3 T with a 3D T2-weighted sequence compared with multiplanar 2D for evaluation of the female pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5914.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martin T, Janzen C, Li X, et al. Characterization of uterine motion in early gestation using MRI-based motion tracking. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10100840.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mickevicius NJ, Paulson ES. Simultaneous acquisition of orthogonal plane cine imaging and isotropic 4D-MRI using super-resolution. Radiother Oncol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.005.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif