Reliability of distal radius fracture classification systems: a CT based study

Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37(8):691–697

Goldfarb CA, Yin Y, Gilula LA, Fisher AJ, Boyer MI (2001) Wrist fractures: what the clinician wants to know. Radiology 219(1):11–28

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Kujur V, Agrawal A, Rakshit J, Sakale H, Kar B, Yadav S (2020) Classification systems of distal radius fractures. J Orthop Dis Traumatol 3(2):36

Article  Google Scholar 

Frykman G (1967) Fracture of the distal radius including sequelae, shoulder-hand syndrome, disturbance in the distal radio-ulnar joint and impairment of nerve function; A clinical and experimental study. Acta Orthop Scand.;108

DL F (1993) Fracture of the distal radius: operative treatment. Instr Course Lect 42:73–99

Google Scholar 

Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF (2018) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2018. J Orthop Trauma 32:S1–10

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sharma M, Choudhury SR, Prakash M, Sinha A, Sheth R, Sandhu MS (2023) MDCT evaluation of distal radius fractures and their association with carpal and distal ulnar fractures. Emerg Radiol 30(5):629–635

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hallgren KA (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 8(1):23

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Light RJ (1971) Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: some generalizations and alternatives. Psychol Bull 76(5):365

Article  Google Scholar 

Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284

Article  Google Scholar 

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics.;159–174

Harness NG, Ring D, Zurakowski D, Harris GJ, Jupiter JB (2006) The Influence of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstructions on the Characterization and Treatment of Distal Radial Fractures. JBJS. 88(6). https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/fulltext/2006/06000/the_influence_of_three_dimensional_computed.20.aspx

Carlos J, Marcel B, Sugawara J, Carlos T, Da Silveira E, João F et al (2008) Are distal radius fracture classifi cations reproducible? Intra and interobserver agreement. 126, Sao Paulo Med J

Andersen DJ, Blair WF, Stevers CM Jr, Adams BD, El-Khouri GY, Brandser EA (1996) Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. J Hand Surg Am 21(4):574–582

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ferrero A, Garavaglia G, Gehri R, Maenza F, Petri GJ, Fusetti C (2011) Analysis of the Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement in Radiographic Evaluation of Wrist Fractures Using the Multimedia Messaging Service. HAND. 6(4):384–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-011-9362-4

Bergvall M, Bergdahl C, Ekholm C, Wennergren D (2021) Validity of classification of distal radial fractures in the Swedish fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 22(1)

Naqvi SGA, Reynolds T, Kitsis C (2009) Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the fernandez classification for distal radius fractures. J Hand Surgery: Eur Volume 34(4):483–485

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Arealis G, Galanopoulos I, Nikolaou VS, Lacon A, Ashwood N, Kitsis C (2014) Does the CT improve inter-and intra-observer agreement for the AO, Fernandez and Universal classification systems for distal radius fractures? Injury 45(10):1579–1584

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jayakumar P, Teunis T, Giménez B, Verstreken F, Di Mascio L, Jupiter J (2016) AO Distal Radius Fracture Classification: Global Perspective on Observer Agreement. J Wrist Surg 06(01):046–53

Article  Google Scholar 

Kleinlugtenbelt YV, Groen SR, Ham SJ, Kloen P, Haverlag R, Simons MP et al (2017) Classification systems for distal radius fractures: Does the reliability improve using additional computed tomography? Acta Orthop 88(6):681–687

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Peña-Martínez VM, Villanueva-Guerra E, Tamez-Mata Y, Simental-Mendía M, Gallardo-Madrid A, Blázquez-Saldaña J et al (2022) Distal radius fractures: Classifications concordance among orthopedic residents on a teaching hospital. J Orthop Sci

Noda M, Takahara S, Inui A, Osawa S, Matsushita T (2023) Inter-observer Agreement and Reproducibility of Pertrochanteric Fracture Classification Using Plain Radiograph Versus Computed Tomogram Images: A Study of 523 Patients. Cureus

Wæver D, Madsen ML, Rölfing JHD, Borris LC, Henriksen M, Nagel LL et al (2018) Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify. Injury 49:S29–32

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carula BC, Giostri GS, Bebber F, Batista MFDS, Silva FB, Da, Novak EM (2021) Evaluation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of the New AO/OTA Classification for Distal Radius Fractures Compared with the Fernandez Classification. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 57(6):917–923

Google Scholar 

Küçük L, Kumbaraci M, Günay H, Karapinar L, Özdemir O (2013) Reliability and reproducibility of classifications for distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 47(3):153–157

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Plant CE, Hickson C, Hedley H, Parsons NR, Costa ML, Parsons ν NR et al Is it time to revisit the AO classification of fractures of the distal radius? Inter-and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification

Mansur H, Gripp LD (2020) Evaluation of three classification systems for fractures of the distal end of the radius: Frykman, Universal and A.O. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plastica 35(2):198–202

Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif