Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L et al (2023) Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis. 2022. Eur Urol Focus 9(1):199–208

Shroff S, Watson GM, Parikh A et al (1996) The holmium: YAG laser for ureteric stones. Br J Urol 78(6):836–839

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Castellani D, Fong KY, Lim EJ et al (2023) Comparison between Holmium:YAG Laser with MOSES Technology vs Thulium Fiber laser lithotripsy in Retrograde Intrarenal surgery for kidney stones in adults: a propensity score-matched analysis from the FLEXible Ureteroscopy outcomes Registry. J Urol 210(2):323–330

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen S, Zhou L, Wei T et al (2017) Comparison of Holmium: YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the treatment of Ureteral stones: an Update Meta-Analysis. Urol Int 98(2):125–133

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM (2010) Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy using tapered fibers. Lasers Surg Med 42(1):45–50

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Denstedt J, Gabrigna, Berto FC (2023) Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: is it living up to the hype? Asian J Urol 10(3):289–297

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kronenberg P, Traxer O (2019) The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol 8(Suppl 4):S398–S417

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P (2022) Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol 82(1):73–79

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM (2010) Holmium:YAG (lambda = 2,120 nm) versus thulium fiber (lambda = 1,908 nm) laser lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med 42(3):232–236

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Traxer O, Keller EX (2020) Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol 38(8):1883–1894

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jones P, Beisland C, Ulvik O (2021) Current status of thulium fibre laser lithotripsy: an up-to-date review. BJU Int 128(5):531–538

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ding TF, Xiao B, Zeng X et al (2023) )study of temperature changes around Fibres in Super Pulse Thulium Fibre laser in Vitro Lithotripsy. Urol J 20(2):96–101

Google Scholar 

Esch E, Simmons WN, Sankin G et al (2010) Simple method for fabricating artificial kidney stones of different physical properties. Urol Res 38(4):315–319

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Molina WR, Carrera RV, Chew BH et al (2021) Temperature rise during ureteral laser lithotripsy: comparison of super pulse thulium fiber laser (SPTF) vs high power 120 W holmium-YAG laser (Ho:YAG). World J Urol 39(10):3951–3956

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu M, Peng Y, Wang Z et al (2021) Ablation efficiency of a Novel Thulium Fiber laser: an in Vitro Study on Laser setting and Fiber usage. J Endourol 35(8):1211–1216

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hardy LA, Vinnichenko V, Fried NM (2019) High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies. Lasers Surg Med 51(6):522–530

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geavlete B, Multescu R, Iordache V et al (2021) Romanian national premiere with the new Thulium SuperPulsed laser in the endourological treatment of urolithiasis. J Med Life 14(3):316–322

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sierra A, Corrales M, Somani B et al (2022) Laser efficiency and laser safety: Holmium YAG vs. Thulium Fiber laser. J Clin Med 12(1):149

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Enikeev D, Taratkin M, Klimov R et al (2020) Superpulsed Thulium Fiber laser for Stone Dusting: in search of a perfect ablation Regimen-A prospective single-center study. J Endourol 34(11):1175–1179

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Winship B, Terry R, Boydston K et al (2019) Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet laser pulse type affects irrigation temperatures in a Benchtop Ureteral Model. J Endourol 33(11):896–901

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

He X, McGee S, Coad JE et al (2004) Investigation of the thermal and tissue injury behaviour in microwave thermal therapy using a porcine kidney model. Int J Hyperth 20(6):567–593

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Aldoukhi AH, Hall TL, Ghani KR et al (2018) Caliceal Fluid Temperature during High-Power Holmium laser lithotripsy in an in vivo Porcine Model. J Endourol 32(8):724–729

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Taratkin M, Laukhtina E, Singla N et al (2020) Temperature changes during laser lithotripsy with Ho:YAG laser and novel Tm-fiber laser: a comparative in-vitro study. World J Urol 38(12):3261–3266

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andreeva V, Vinarov A, Yaroslavsky I et al (2020) Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy. World J Urol 38(2):497–503

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar