Macran S, Weatherly H, Kind P. Measuring population health: a comparison of three generic health status measures. Med Care. 2003;41:218–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

EuroQol. A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.

Article  Google Scholar 

Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:622–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pynsent PB. Choosing an outcome measure. J bone Joint Surg Br Volume. 2001;83:792–4.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Rowen D, Azzabi Zouraq I, Chevrou-Severac H, et al. International Regulations and Recommendations for Utility Data for Health Technology Assessment. PharmacoEconomics. 2017;35:11–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA. 1995;273:59–65.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kreimeier S, Greiner W. EQ-5D-Y as a health-related quality of life instrument for children and adolescents: the instrument’s characteristics, Development, current use, and challenges of developing its Value Set. Value Health: J Int Soc Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2019;22:31–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mireku MO, Barker MM, Mutz J, et al. Night-time screen-based media device use and adolescents’ sleep and health-related quality of life. Environ Int. 2019;124:66–78.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhou W, Shen A, Yang Z, et al. Patient-caregiver agreement and test-retest reliability of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L in paediatric patients with haematological malignancies. Eur J Health Econ. 2021;22:1103–13.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Verstraete J, Marthinus Z, Dix-Peek S, et al. Measurement properties and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-Y-5L compared to the EQ-5D-Y-3L in children and adolescents receiving acute orthopaedic care. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022;20:28.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kim SK, Jo MW, Kim SH. A cross sectional survey on health-related quality of life of elementary school students using the Korean version of the EQ-5D-Y. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3115.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wong CKH, Cheung PWH, Luo N, et al. A head-to-head comparison of five-level (EQ-5D-5L-Y) and three-level EQ-5D-Y questionnaires in paediatric patients. Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20:647–56.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Golicki D, Młyńczak K. Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D-Y: A Systematic Review. Value in health. 2022.

Ravens-Sieberer U, Wille N, Badia X, et al. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EQ-5D-Y: results from a multinational study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:887–97.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pei W, Yue S, Zhi-Hao Y, et al. Testing measurement properties of two EQ-5D youth versions and KIDSCREEN-10 in China. Eur J Health Econ. 2021;22:1083–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burström K, Bartonek Å, Broström EW et al. EQ-5D-Y as a health-related quality of life measure in children and adolescents with functional disability in Sweden: testing feasibility and validity. Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway: 1992). 2014; 103: 426 – 35.

Pan CW, Zhong H, Li J, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in elementary and secondary school students using the Chinese version of the EQ-5D-Y in rural China. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:982.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

EQ-5DEuroQol Research Foundation, User Guide -Y. 2024. Accessed 2024.06.30, https://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Userguide-EQ5D-Y3L-0424-07.pdf

Flitcroft DI, He M, Jonas JB et al. IMI - Defining and Classifying Myopia: A Proposed Set of Standards for Clinical and Epidemiologic Studies. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2019; 60: M20-m30.

Haarman AEG, Enthoven CA, Tideman JWL et al. The Complications of Myopia: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2020; 61: 49.

Gupta S, Joshi A, Saxena H, et al. Outdoor activity and myopia progression in children: a follow-up study using mixed-effects model. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:3446–50.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-3L User Guide. 2018. Accessed 2024.06.30, https://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/EQ-5D-3LUserguide-23-07.pdf

Liu GG, Wu H, Li M, et al. Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Value Health. 2014;17:597–604.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang Z, Jiang J, Wang P, et al. Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L value set for China. PharmacoEconomics. 2022;40:147–55.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Balestroni G, Bertolotti G. EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life. Monaldi Archives Chest Disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace. 2012;78:155–9.

Google Scholar 

Xie S, Wang D, Wu J, et al. Comparison of the measurement properties of SF-6Dv2 and EQ-5D-5L in a Chinese population health survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022;20:96.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Xie S, Li M, Wang D, et al. Comparison of the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6Dv2 among overweight and obesity populations in China. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023;21:118.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barton GR, Sach TH, Avery AJ, et al. A comparison of the performance of the EQ-5D and SF-6D for individuals aged > or = 45 years. Health Econ. 2008;17:815–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhao FL, Yue M, Yang H, et al. Validation and comparison of EuroQol and short form 6D in chronic prostatitis patients. Value Health. 2010;13:649–56.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ye Z, Sun L, Wang Q. A head-to-head comparison of EQ-5D-5 L and SF-6D in Chinese patients with low back pain. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17:57.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–89.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suárez L, Tay B, Abdullah F. Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment in Singapore. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:2945–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Heslin M, Chua KC, Trevillion K, et al. Psychometric properties of the five-level EuroQoL-5 dimension and short Form-6 dimension measures of health-related quality of life in a population of pregnant women with depression. BJPsych open. 2019;5:e88.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Thuppal S, Markwell S, Crabtree T, et al. Comparison between the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D quality of life (QOL) questionnaires in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergoing lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). Qual Life Res. 2019;28:1885–92.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the P value is not enough. J Graduate Med Educ. 2012;4:279–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cunillera O, Tresserras R, Rajmil L, et al. Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:853–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kularatna S, Byrnes J, Chan YK, et al. Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D (SF-12) contemporaneous utility scores in patients with cardiovascular disease. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:3399–408.

Article  PubMed