Comparative study of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy versus perineal stapler resection for external full-thickness rectal prolapse in elderly patients: enhanced outcomes and reduced recurrence rates—a retrospective cohort study

Bordeianou L, Paquette I, Johnson E et al (2017) Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 60(11):1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000889

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yiasemidou M, Yates C, Cooper E, Goldacre R, Lindsey I (2023) External rectal prolapse: more than meets the eye. Tech Coloproctol 27(10):783–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02829-8

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gallo G, Martellucci J, Pellino G et al (2018) Consensus statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 22(12):919–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1908-9

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Emile SH, Elfeki H, Shalaby M, Sakr A, Sileri P, Wexner SD (2019) Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness external rectal prolapse: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of the predictors for recurrence. Surg Endosc 33(8):2444–2455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06803-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Emile SH, Khan SM, Garoufalia Z et al (2023) A network meta-analysis of surgical treatments of complete rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 27(10):787–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02813-2

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scherer R, Marti L, Hetzer FH (2008) Perineal stapled prolapse resection: a new procedure for external rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1727–1730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9423-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Romano G, Bianco F, Caggiano L (2009) Modified perineal stapled rectal resection with contour transtar for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 11(8):878–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01901.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kössler-Ebs JB, Grummich K, Jensen K et al (2016) Incisional hernia rates after laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery—a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 40(10):2319–2330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3520-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brown SR, Pearson K, Hainsworth A, Williams A (2022) Treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse after a laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 26(12):991–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02689-8

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mäkelä-Kaikkonen J, Rautio T, Ohinmaa A et al (2019) Cost-analysis and quality of life after laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for posterior compartment prolapse: a randomized trial. Tech Coloproctol 23(5):461–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-01991-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vandenbroucke JP, Elm EV, Altman DG et al (2007) Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 147(8):W-163–W-194. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1

Article  Google Scholar 

Park B-S, Cho SH, Son GM et al (2021) Absent or impaired rectoanal inhibitory reflex as a diagnostic factor for high-grade (grade III–V) rectal prolapse: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 21(1):157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01729-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed 1 Oct 2022

Seong MK, Jung SI, Kim TW, Joh HK (2011) Comparative analysis of summary scoring systems in measuring fecal incontinence. J Korean Surg Soc 81(5):326–331. https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2011.81.5.326

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Altomare D, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V (2008) Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 10(1):84–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01262.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tutticci N, Klein A, Sonson R, Bourke MJ (2016) Endoscopic resection of subtotal or completely circumferential laterally spreading colonic adenomas: technique, caveats, and outcomes. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-101854

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Solari S, Martellucci J, Ascanelli S et al (2022) Predictive factors for functional failure of ventral mesh rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 26(12):973–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-022-02708-8

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van der Schans EM, Paulides TJC, Wijffels NA, Consten ECJ (2018) Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines. Tech Coloproctol 22(8):589–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1830-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramage L, Simillis C, Yen C et al (2017) Magnetic resonance defecography versus clinical examination and fluoroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 21:915–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1704-y

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Piloni V, Bergamasco M, Melara G, Garavello P (2018) The clinical value of magnetic resonance defecography in males with obstructed defecation syndrome. Tech Coloproctol 22:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1759-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martin-Martin GP, Garcia-Armengol J, Roig-Vila JV et al (2017) Magnetic resonance defecography versus videodefecography in the study of obstructed defecation syndrome: is videodefecography still the test of choice after 50 years? Tech Coloproctol 21:795–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1666-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khalil OH, Habeeb TA, Sieda BM (2020) Modified perineal linear stapler resection for external rectal prolapse. Ann Med Surg 54:22–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.03.011

Article  Google Scholar 

Farag A, Mashhour AN, Raslan M, Tamer M, Elbarmelgi MY (2020) Laparoscopic pelvic organ prolapse suspension (Pops) versus laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for treatment of rectal prolapse: prospective cohort study. World J Surg 44:3158–3166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05585-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cullen J, Rosselli JM, Gurland BH (2012) Ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 25(01):034–036. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1301757

Article  Google Scholar 

Faucheron JL, Trilling B, Girard E, Sage PY, Barbois S, Reche F (2015) Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: technical and functional results. World J Gastroenterol 21(16):5049. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i16.5049

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McLean R, Kipling M, Musgrave E, Mercer-Jones M (2018) Short-and long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy using biological mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective cohort study of 224 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 20(5):424–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13996

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Albayati S, Chen P, Morgan MJ, Toh JWT (2019) Robotic vs laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 23(6):529–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-019-02014-w

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gleditsch D, Wexels WA, Nesbakken A (2018) Surgical options and trends in treating rectal prolapse: long-term results in a 19-year follow-up study. Langenb Arch Surg 403:991–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-018-1728-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Gouvas N, Georgiou PA, Agalianos C et al (2015) Ventral colporectopexy for overt rectal prolapse and obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 17(2):O34–O46. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12751

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fu CW, Stevenson AR (2017) Risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 60(2):178–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000710

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW, Dietz DW (2008) Recurrence and quality of life following perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 12:1446–1451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0531-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Phillips RKS (2002) Colorectal surgery—a companion to specialist surgical practice, 2nd edn. Tech Coloproctol 6(1):65–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510200013

Article  Google Scholar 

Hu B, Zou Q, Xian Z et al (2022) External rectal prolapse: abdominal or perineal repair for men? A retrospective cohort study. Gastroenterol Rep 10:goac007. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goac007

Article  Google Scholar 

Joubert K, Laryea JA (2017) Abdominal approaches to rectal prolapse. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 30(01):057–062. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1593426

Article  Google Scholar 

Wallenhorst T, Bouguen G, Brochard C et al (2015) Long-term impact of full-thickness rectal prolapse treatment on fecal incontinence. Surgery 158(1):104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.005

Article  PubMed 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif