Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2011;26:1270–83.

Article  Google Scholar 

Storr A, Venetis CA, Cooke S, Kilani S, Ledger W. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2017;32:307–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wong CC, Loewke KE, Bossert NL, Behr B, De Jonge CJ, Baer TM, et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:1115–21.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ESHRE Working group on Time-lapse technology, Apter S, Ebner T, Freour T, Guns Y, Kovacic B, et al. Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology†. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020:hoaa008.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pribenszky C, Nilselid A-M, Montag M. Time-lapse culture with morphokinetic embryo selection improves pregnancy and live birth chances and reduces early pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35:511–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsøe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohí J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2011;26:2658–71.

Article  Google Scholar 

Polanski LT, Coelho Neto MA, Nastri CO, Navarro PA, Ferriani RA, Raine-Fenning N, et al. Time-lapse embryo imaging for improving reproductive outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:394–401.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Armstrong S, Arroll N, Cree LM, Jordan V, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;CD011320.

Racowsky C, Kovacs P, Martins WP. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:1025–30.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen M, Wei S, Hu J, Yuan J, Liu F. Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0178720.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Swain JE. Controversies in ART: considerations and risks for uninterrupted embryo culture. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39:19–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zaninovic N, Irani M, Meseguer M. Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy? Fertil Steril. 2017;108:722–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang R, Pan W, Jin L, Li Y, Geng Y, Gao C, et al. Artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine. Reprod Camb Engl. 2019;158:R139–54.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zaninovic N, Rosenwaks Z. Artificial intelligence in human in vitro fertilization and embryology. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:914–20.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Manna C, Nanni L, Lumini A, Pappalardo S. Artificial intelligence techniques for embryo and oocyte classification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:42–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dimitriadis I, Zaninovic N, Badiola AC, Bormann CL. Artificial intelligence in the embryology laboratory: a review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;44:435–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raef B, Ferdousi R. A review of machine learning approaches in assisted Reproductive technologies. Acta Inf Med AIM J Soc Med Inf Bosnia Herzeg Cas Drustva Za Med Inf BiH. 2019;27:205–11.

Google Scholar 

Giscard d’Estaing S, Labrune E, Forcellini M, Edel C, Salle B, Lornage J, et al. A machine learning system with reinforcement capacity for predicting the fate of an ART embryo. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2021;67:64–78.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Revelli A, Rovei V, Dalmasso P, Gennarelli G, Racca C, Evangelista F, et al. Large randomized trial comparing transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with a technique based on uterine length measurement before embryo transfer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:289–95.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Huber M, Hadziosmanovic N, Berglund L, Holte J. Using the ovarian sensitivity index to define poor, normal, and high response after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the long gonadotropin-releasing hormone-agonist protocol: suggestions for a new principle to solve an old problem. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1270–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Revelli A, Gennarelli G, Biasoni V, Chiadò A, Carosso A, Evangelista F, Paschero C, Filippini C, Benedetto C. The ovarian sensitivity Index (OSI) significantly correlates with Ovarian Reserve biomarkers, is more predictive of clinical pregnancy than the total number of oocytes, and is consistent in consecutive IVF cycles. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1914. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061914.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen [Internet]. World Health Organization. ; 2010. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44261.

Canosa S, Adriaenssens T, Coucke W, Dalmasso P, Revelli A, Benedetto C, et al. Zona pellucida gene mRNA expression in human oocytes is related to oocyte maturity, zona inner layer retardance and fertilization competence. Mol Hum Reprod. 2017;23:292–303.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Canosa S, Paschero C, Carosso A, Leoncini S, Mercaldo N, Gennarelli G, et al. Effect of a combination of Myo-Inositol, Alpha-Lipoic Acid, and folic acid on oocyte morphology and embryo morphokinetics in non-PCOS Overweight/Obese patients undergoing IVF: a pilot, prospective, randomized study. J Clin Med. 2020;9:E2949.

Article  Google Scholar 

Holte J, Berglund L, Milton K, Garello C, Gennarelli G, Revelli A, et al. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2007;22:548–57.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Vaegter KK, Lakic TG, Olovsson M, Berglund L, Brodin T, Holte J. Which factors are most predictive for live birth after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatments? Analysis of 100 prospectively recorded variables in 8,400 IVF/ICSI single-embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017;107:641–648e2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rhenman A, Berglund L, Brodin T, Olovsson M, Milton K, Hadziosmanovic N, Holte J. Which set of embryo variables is most predictive for live birth? A prospective study in 6252 single embryo transfers to construct an embryo score for the ranking and selection of embryos. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(1):28–36.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Canosa S, Bergandi L, Macrì C, Charrier L, Paschero C, Carosso A, et al. Morphokinetic analysis of cleavage stage embryos and assessment of specific gene expression in cumulus cells independently predict human embryo development to expanded blastocyst: a preliminary study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:1409–20.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hammond ER, Foong AKM, Rosli N, Morbeck DE. Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:1045–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cimadomo D, Sosa Fernandez L, Soscia D, Fabozzi G, Benini F, Cesana A, Dal Canto MB, Maggiulli R, Muzzi S, Scarica C, et al. Inter-centre reliability in embryo grading across several IVF clinics is limited: implications for embryo selection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;44:39–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chiappetta V, Innocenti F, Coticchio G, Ahlström A, Albricci L, Badajoz V, Hebles M, Gallardo M, Benini F, Canosa S, Kumpošt J, Milton K, Montanino Oliva D, Maggiulli R, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D. Discard or not discard, that is the question: an international survey across 117 embryologists on the clinical management of borderline quality blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2023;38(10):1901–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Rossum G, Drake FL. Python 3 reference Manual. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace; 2009.

Google Scholar 

Ciray HN, Campbell A, Agerholm IE, Aguilar J, Chamayou S, Esbert M, et al. Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2014;29:2650–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:1126–30.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barrenetxea G, López de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jiménez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:49–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Patounakis G, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, et al. Investigating the impact of the timing of blastulation on implantation: management of embryo-endometrial synchrony improves outcomes. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;2018:hoy022.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hashimoto S, Amo A, Hama S, Ito K, Nakaoka Y, Morimoto Y. Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1528–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yi HJ, Koo HS, Cha SH, Kim HO, Park CW, Song IO. Reproductive outcomes of retransferring retained embryos in blastocyst transfer cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016;43(2):133–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Lou H, Zhang J, Du M, Du Y, Wu S, Guan Y, Liu J. Clinical outcome analysis of frozen-thawed embryo transfer on Day 7. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:1082597.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. Alpha scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of art laboratory performance indicators. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;2017(2):hox011.

Article