Hurst L, Mahtani K, Pluddemann A, Lewis S, Harvey K, Briggs A, et al. Defining value-based healthcare in the NHS: CEBM report. 2019. Available at: https://046.medsci.ox.ac.uk/files/reports/defining-value-based-healthcare-in-the-nhs. Accessed 22 Jan 2023.

Stewart-Brown S, Tennant A, Tennant R, Platt S, Parkinson J, Weich S. Internal construct validity of the Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): a Rasch analysis using data from the Scottish health education population survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, Parkinson J, Secker J, Stewart-Brown S. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Blenkiron P, Goldsmith L. Patient-reported outcome measures in community mental health teams: pragmatic evaluation of PHQ-9, GAD-7 and SWEMWBS. BJPsych Bull. 2019;43:221–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fat LN, Scholes S, Boniface S, Mindell J, Stewart-Brown S. Evaluating and establishing national norms for mental wellbeing using the short Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS): findings from the Health Survey for England. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:1129–44.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rogers KD, Dodds C, Campbell M, Young A. The validation of the short Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS) with deaf British sign language users in the UK. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16:1–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shah N, Cader M, Andrews WP, Wijesekera D, Stewart-Brown SL. Responsiveness of the short Warwick Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS): evaluation a clinical sample. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16:1–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vaingankar JA, Abdin E, Chong SA, Sambasivam R, Seow E, Jeyagurunathan A, Picco L, Stewart-Brown S, Subramaniam M. Psychometric properties of the short Warwick Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS) in service users with schizophrenia, depression and anxiety spectrum disorders. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:1–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fujiwara D, Keohane K, Clayton V, Hotopp U. Mental health and life satisfaction: the relationship between the Warwick Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale and life satisfaction a pilot study. UK: HACT and Simetrica London; 2017.

Google Scholar 

Longworth L, Rowen D. Mapping to obtain EQ-5D utility values for use in NICE health technology assessments. Value Health. 2013;16:202–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE health technology evaluations: the manual. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2022. https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg36/resources/nice-health-technology-evaluations-the-manual-pdf-72286779244741. Accessed 22 Jan 2023.

Brazier J. Is the EQ–5D fit for purpose in mental health? Br J Psychiatry. 2010;197:348–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brazier J, Connell J, Papaioannou D, Mukuria C, Mulhern B, Peasgood T, Jones ML, Paisley S, OCathain A, Barkham M. A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2014;18:vii.

PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chua YC, Wong HH, Abdin E, Vaingankar J, Shahwan S, Cetty L, Yong YH, Hon C, Lee H, Tang C. The recovering quality of life 10-item (ReQoL-10) scale in a first-episode psychosis population: validation and implications for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020;15.

Keetharuth AD, Bjorner JB, Barkham M, Browne J, Croudace T, Brazier J. Exploring the item sets of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures using factor analysis. Qual Life Res. 2019;28:1005–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Aken B, de Beurs E, Mulder C, van der Feltz-Cornelis C. The Dutch recovering quality of life questionnaire (ReQoL) and its psychometric qualities. Eur J Psychiatry. 2020;34:99–107.

Article  Google Scholar 

Keetharuth AD, Brazier J, Connell J, Bjorner JB, Carlton J, Buck ET, Ricketts T, McKendrick K, Browne J, Croudace T. Recovering quality of life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;212:42–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Keetharuth AD, Rowen D, Bjorner JB, Brazier J. Estimating a preference-based index for mental health from the recovering quality of life measure: valuation of recovering quality of life utility index. Value Health. 2021;24:281–90.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yiu HHE, Buckell J, Petrou S, Stewart-Brown S, Madan J. Derivation of a UK preference-based value set for the short Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (SWEMWBS) to allow estimation of mental well-being adjusted life years (MWALYs). Soc Sci Med. 2023;327:115928.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior science. Lawrance Eribaum Association; 1988.

Google Scholar 

Gray AM, Rivero-Arias O, Clarke PM. Estimating the association between SF-12 responses and EQ-5D utility values by response mapping. Med Decis Mak. 2006;26:18–29.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mukuria C, Rowen D, Harnan S, Rawdin A, Wong R, Ara R, Brazier J. An updated systematic review of studies mapping (or cross-walking) measures of health-related quality of life to generic preference-based measures to generate utility values. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019;17:295–313.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wailoo AJ, Hernandez-Alava M, Manca A, Mejia A, Ray J, Crawford B, Botteman M, Busschbach J. Mapping to estimate health-state utility from non–preference-based outcome measures: an ISPOR good practices for outcomes research task force report. Value Health. 2017;20:18–27.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hernández MA, Wailoo A, Pudney S, Gray L, Manca A. Mapping clinical outcomes to generic preference-based outcome measures: development and comparison of methods. Health Technol Assess (Winchester, England). 2020;24:1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Connell J, OCathain A, Brazier J. Measuring quality of life in mental health: are we asking the right questions? Soc Sci Med. 2014;120:12–20.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gray LA, Alava MH, Wailoo AJ. Development of methods for the mapping of utilities using mixture models: mapping the AQLQ-S to the EQ-5D-5L and the HUI3 in patients with asthma. Value Health. 2018;21:748–57.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gray LA, Hernandez Alava M, Wailoo AJ. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gray LA, Wailoo AJ, Alava MH. Mapping the FACT-B instrument to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer using adjusted limited dependent variable mixture models versus response mapping. Value Health. 2018;21:1399–405.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hernández Alava M, Wailoo A, Wolfe F, Michaud K. A comparison of direct and indirect methods for the estimation of health utilities from clinical outcomes. Med Decis Mak. 2014;34:919–30.

Article  Google Scholar