Skin Pharmacology and Physiology
Alyoussef Alkrad J.a· Almalki Y.A.a· Dahmash E.Z.a,b· Hassouneh L.K.b· Neubert R.H.H.caFaculty of Pharmacy, Isra University, Amman, Jordan
bDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, London, UK
cInstitute of Applied Dermatopharmacy, Martin Luther University Halle-, Wittenberg, Germany
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Rent via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate and mark up articles Printing and downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication DetailsFirst-Page Preview
Received: April 13, 2022
Accepted: October 26, 2022
Published online: December 01, 2022
Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 7
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 1660-5527 (Print)
eISSN: 1660-5535 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/SPP
AbstractIntroduction: Heparin is a commonly used anti-coagulant administered either by intravenous or subcutaneous injection for a systemic effect or topically for the treatment of peripheral vascular disorders. Objective: This study aimed to formulate heparin in non-ionic colloidal carrier systems (CCSs) having enhanced percutaneous absorption for systemic and topical administration. Methods: Five CCSs were developed and characterized for their rheological properties, droplet size, and drug loading. The percutaneous absorption of heparin was evaluated in vitro using Franz diffusion cells with rats’ skin and with the aid of a developed high-pressure chromatography method. Furthermore, the efficacy of two developed heparin CCSs was tested percutaneously in rats by measuring the response against the time in comparison to subcutaneous administration. Results: The rheograms and droplet size measurements showed that the developed drug delivery systems have Newtonian properties with a droplet size between 109 and 460 nm. As much as 500 mg of heparin could be loaded in around 5 mL of CCS. Furthermore, using Franz diffusion cells, a diffusion rate of 19.216 ± 2.01 USP U/cm2.h could be achieved for heparin-loaded CCSs. Moreover, the estimated percutaneous in vivo relative bioavailability in comparison to subcutaneous administration could reflect that at least more than 50% of the drug passed through the skin. Conclusion: The developed novel non-toxic CCSs containing heparin can be good candidates for percutaneous administration as alternative delivery systems for subcutaneous and intravenous invasive administration.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
References Onishi A, St Ange K, Dordick JS, Linhardt RJ. Heparin and anticoagulation. Front Biosci. 2016;21(7):1372–92. Schick BP. Serglycin proteoglycan deletion in mouse platelets: physiological effects and their implications for platelet contributions to thrombosis, inflammation, atherosclerosis, and metastasis. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2010;93:235–87. DeSancho M, Rand J. Physiology of normal hemostasis. 6th ed. In: Kufe D, Pollock R, Weichselbaum R, editors. Holland - frei cancer medicine. Hamilton (ON): BC Decker; 2003. Lindahl U, Thunberg L, Bäckström G, Riesenfeld J, Nordling K, Björk I. Extension and structural variability of the antithrombin-binding sequence in heparin. J Biol Chem. 1984;259(20):12368–76. Zhang F, Yang B, Ly M, Solakyildirim K, Xiao Z, Wang Z, et al. Structural characterization of heparins from different commercial sources. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;401(9):2793–803. Kamhi E, Joo EJ, Dordick JS, Linhardt RJ. Glycosaminoglycans in infectious disease. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013;88(4):928–43. Vecchio C, Frisinghelli A. Topically applied heparins for the treatment of vascular disorders: a comprehensive review. Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(10):603–14. Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Shaughnessy SG, Anand SS, Halperin JL, Raschke R, et al. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. Chest. 2001;119(1 Suppl l):64S–94S. Money SR, York JW. Development of oral heparin therapy for prophylaxis and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;9(3):211–8. Ito Y, Murakami A, Maeda T, Sugioka N, Takada K. Evaluation of self-dissolving needles containing low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in rats. Int J Pharm. 2008;349(1–2):124–9. So J. Improving patient compliance with biopharmaceuticals by reducing injection-associated pain. J Mucopolysaccharidosis Rare Dis. 2015;1(1):15–8. Ita KB, Popova IE. Influence of sonophoresis and chemical penetration enhancers on percutaneous transport of penbutolol sulfate. Pharm Dev Technol. 2016;21(8):990–5. Ita KB. Transdermal drug delivery: progress and challenges. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2014;24(3):245–50. Mitragotri S, Kost J. Transdermal delivery of heparin and low-molecular weight heparin using low-frequency ultrasound. Pharm Res. 2001;18(8):1151–6. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Nov;26(11):1261–8. Van Smeden J, Janssens M, Gooris GS, Bouwstra JA. The important role of stratum corneum lipids for the cutaneous barrier function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1841(3):295–313. Finbloom JA, Sousa F, Stevens MM, Desai TA. Engineering the drug carrier biointerface to overcome biological barriers to drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;167:89–108. Lanke SSS, Kolli CS, Strom JG, Banga AK. Enhanced transdermal delivery of low molecular weight heparin by barrier perturbation. Int J Pharm. 2009;365(1–2):26–33. García-Sánchez T, Azan A, Leray I, Rosell-Ferrer J, Bragos R, Mir LM. Interpulse multifrequency electrical impedance measurements during electroporation of adherent differentiated myotubes. Bioelectrochemistry. 2015;105:123–35. Prausnitz MR, Edelman ER, Gimm JA, Langer R, Weaver JC. Transdermal delivery of heparin by skin electroporation. Biotechnology. 1995;13(11):1205–9. Ita K. Transdermal iontophoretic drug delivery: advances and challenges. J Drug Target. 2016;24(5):386–91. Marro D, Kalia YN, Delgado-Charro MB, Guy RH. Contributions of electromigration and electroosmosis to iontophoretic drug delivery. Pharm Res. 2001;18(12):1701–8. Abla N, Naik A, Guy RH, Kalia YN. Contributions of electromigration and electroosmosis to peptide iontophoresis across intact and impaired skin. J Control Release. 2005;108(2–3):319–30. Pacini S, Punzi T, Gulisano M, Cecchi F, Vannucchi S, Ruggiero M. Transdermal delivery of heparin using pulsed current iontophoresis. Pharm Res. 2006;23(1):114–20. Han T, Das DB. Permeability enhancement for transdermal delivery of large molecule using low-frequency sonophoresis combined with microneedles. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(10):3614–22. Ita KB, Banga AK. In vitro transdermal iontophoretic delivery of penbutolol sulfate. Drug Deliv. 2009;16(1):11–4. Patel RP, Gaiakwad DR, Patel NA. Formulation, optimization, and evaluation of a transdermal patch of heparin sodium. Drug Discov Ther. 2014;8(4):185–93. Shinoda K, Lindman B. Organized surfactant systems: microemulsions. Langmuir. 1987;3(2):135–49. Lawrence MJ, Rees GD. Microemulsion-based media as novel drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2000;45(1):89–121. Kanicky JR, Shah DO, Patanjali PK, Palla BJ, Bagwe RP. Improved drug delivery using microemulsions: rationale, recent progress, and new horizons. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2001;18(1):64–140. Alkrad JA, Assaf SM, Hussein-Al-Ali SH, Alrousan R. Microemulsions as nanocarriers for oral and transdermal administration of enoxaparin. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2022;70:103248. Alyoussef Alkrad J, Neubert RHH. Dermal and transdermal peptide delivery using enhancer molecules and colloidal carrier systems. Part V: transdermal administration of insulin. Int J Pharm. 2022;616:121511. Neubert RHH, Sommer E, Schölzel M, Tuchscherer B, Mrestani Y, Wohlrab J. Dermal peptide delivery using enhancer moleculs and colloidal carrier systems. Part II: tetrapeptide PKEK. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;124:28–33. Han X, Lu Y, Xie J, Zhang E, Zhu H, Du H, et al. Zwitterionic micelles efficiently deliver oral insulin without opening tight junctions. Nat Nanotechnol. 2020;15(7):605–14. Goebel A, Neubert RHH. Dermal peptide delivery using colloidal carrier systems. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;21(1):3–9. Bardhan S, Kundu K, Chakraborty G, Saha SK, Paul BK. The schulman method of cosurfactant titration of the oil/water interface (dilution method): a review on a well-known powerful technique in interfacial science for characterization of water-in-oil microemulsions. J Surfact Deterg. 2015;18(4):547–67. OECD. Guidance notes on dermal absorption. Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Series on testing and assessment, No. 156: Paris; 2011. BioMed diagnosis. BioMed-Liquicellin-E for APTT determination. 2017. Roy Choudhury S, Mandal A, Chakravorty D, Gopal M, Goswami A. Evaluation of physicochemical properties, and antimicrobial efficacy of monoclinic sulfur-nanocolloid. J Nanopart Res. 2013;15(4):1491–11. Bogdan N, Rodríguez EM, Sanz-Rodríguez F, de la Cruz MCI, Juarranz Á, Jaque D, et al. Bio-functionalization of ligand-free upconverting lanthanide doped nanoparticles for bio-imaging and cell targeting. Nanoscale. 2012;4(12):3647–50. Masarudin MJ, Cutts SM, Evison BJ, Phillips DR, Pigram PJ. Factors determining the stability, size distribution, and cellular accumulation of small, monodisperse chitosan nanoparticles as candidate vectors for anticancer drug delivery: application to the passive encapsulation of 14C-doxorubicin. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2015;8:67–80. Coates J. Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. Encycl Anal Chem. 2000;12:10815–37. Ortiz-Tafoya MC, Tecante A. Physicochemical characterization of sodium stearoyl lactylate (SSL), polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20) and κ-carrageenan. Data Brief. 2018;19:642–50. Reiner M. A classification of rheological properties. J Sci Instrum. 1945;22(7):127–9. Council of Europe . European Pharmacopoeia: monograph chromatographic separation techniques. 4th ed. Strasbourg: Council of EuropeEuropean Directorate for the Quality of Medicine & Health Care of the Council of Europe (EDQM); 2003. p. 61–6. Iuga AO, McGuire MJ. Adherence and health care costs. Risk Manag Healthc Pol. 2014;7:35–44. Sintov AC. Transdermal delivery of curcumin via microemulsion. Int J Pharm. 2015;481(1–2):97–103. Biruss B, Valenta C. The advantage of polymer addition to a non-ionic oil in water microemulsion for the dermal delivery of progesterone. Int J Pharm. 2008;349(1–2):269–73. Allied Market Research. Heparin market overview; 2021. Lopes LB. Overcoming the cutaneous barrier with microemulsions. Pharmaceutics. 2014;6(1):52–77. El Maghraby GM. Transdermal delivery of hydrocortisone from eucalyptus oil microemulsion: effects of cosurfactants. Int J Pharm. 2008 May;355(1–2):285–92. Hathout RM, Nasr M. Transdermal delivery of betahistine hydrochloride using microemulsions: physical characterization, biophysical assessment, confocal imaging and permeation studies. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;110:254–60. Todosijević MN, Savić MM, Batinić BB, Marković BD, Gašperlin M, Ranđelović DV, et al. Biocompatible microemulsions of a model NSAID for skin delivery: a decisive role of surfactants in skin penetration/irritation profiles and pharmacokinetic performance. Int J Pharm. 2015;496(2):931–41. Hofland HEJ, Bouwstra JA, Verhoef JC, Buckton G, Chowdry BZ, Ponec M, et al. Safety aspects of non-ionic surfactant vesicles: a toxicity study related to the physicochemical characteristics of non-ionic surfactants. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2011;44(4):287–94. Notman R, den Otter WK, Noro MG, Briels WJ, Anwar J. The permeability enhancing mechanism of DMSO in ceramide bilayers simulated by molecular dynamics. Biophys J. 2007;93(6):2056–68. Proksch E, Fölster-Holst R, Jensen J-M. Skin barrier function, epidermal proliferation and differentiation in eczema. J Dermatol Sci. 2006;43(3):159–69. Jha SK, Dey S, Karki S. Microemulsions-potential carrier for improved drug delivery. Asian J Biomed Pharm Sci. 2011;1(1). Alkrad JA, Shukla A, Mrestani Y, Neubert RHH. Investigation in W/O developed microemulsions with DMSO as a cosurfactant. Pharmazie. 2016;71(5):258–62. Hait SK, Moulik SP. Determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of nonionic surfactants by donor acceptor interaction with lodine and correlation of CMC with hydrophile lipophile balance and other parameters of the surfactants. J Surfact Deterg. 2001;4(3):303–9. Takahashi S, Hirai N, Shirai M, Ito K, Asai F. Comparison of the blood coagulation profiles of ferrets and rats. J Vet Med Sci. 2011;73(7):953–6. Chernecky CC, Berger BJ. Activated partial thromboplastin substitution test: diagnostic. 6th ed. In: Chernecky CC, Berger BJ, editors. Laboratory tests and diagnostic procedures. St Louis (MO): Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012. p. 101–3. Article / Publication DetailsFirst-Page Preview
Received: April 13, 2022
Accepted: October 26, 2022
Published online: December 01, 2022
Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 7
Number of Tables: 3
ISSN: 1660-5527 (Print)
eISSN: 1660-5535 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/SPP
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
留言 (0)