Risk stratification using coronary artery calcium scoring based on low tube voltage computed tomography

Rumberger JA, Simons DB, Fitzpatrick LA, Sheedy PF, Schwartz RS (1995) Coronary artery calcium area by electron-beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque area. A histopathologic correlative study. Circulation 92(8):2157–2162

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, Bild DE, Burke G, Folsom AR et al (2008) Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med 358(13):1336–1345

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Budoff M, Blaha MJ, Post WS, Kronmal RA et al (2015) 10-year coronary heart disease risk prediction using coronary artery calcium and traditional risk factors: derivation in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) with validation in the HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall) Study and the DHS (Dallas Heart Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 66(15):1643–1653

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Shaw LJ, Giambrone AE, Blaha MJ, Knapper JT, Berman DS, Bellam N et al (2015) Long-term prognosis after coronary artery calcification testing in asymptomatic patients: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 163(1):14–21

Article  Google Scholar 

Budoff MJ, Young R, Burke G, Jeffrey Carr J, Detrano RC, Folsom AR et al (2018) Ten-year association of coronary artery calcium with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Eur Heart J 39(25):2401–2408

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Lo-Kioeng-Shioe MS, Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen D, van Domburg RT, Hadamitzky M, Lima JAC, Hoeks SE et al (2020) Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score in symptomatic individuals: a meta-analysis of 34,000 subjects. Int J Cardiol 299:56–62

Article  Google Scholar 

Nieman K (2015) Evolve or perish for coronary calcium imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(4):354–355

Article  Google Scholar 

Buechel RR, Husmann L, Herzog BA, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou R, Ghadri JR et al (2011) Low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography with prospective electrocardiogram triggering: feasibility in a large population. J Am Coll Cardiol 57(3):332–336

Article  Google Scholar 

Fuchs TA, Stehli J, Bull S, Dougoud S, Clerc OF, Herzog BA et al (2014) Coronary computed tomography angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination. Eur Heart J 35(17):1131–1136

Article  Google Scholar 

Benz DC, Grani C, Hirt Moch B, Mikulicic F, Vontobel J, Fuchs TA et al (2016) Minimized radiation and contrast agent exposure for coronary computed tomography angiography: first clinical experience on a latest generation 256-slice scanner. Acad Radiol 23(8):1008–1014

Article  Google Scholar 

Baron KB, Choi AD, Chen MY (2016) Low radiation dose calcium scoring: evidence and techniques. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 9:12

Article  Google Scholar 

Nakazato R, Dey D, Gutstein A, Le Meunier L, Cheng VY, Pimentel R et al (2009) Coronary artery calcium scoring using a reduced tube voltage and radiation dose protocol with dual-source computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 3(6):394–400

Article  Google Scholar 

Marwan M, Mettin C, Pflederer T, Seltmann M, Schuhback A, Muschiol G et al (2013) Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(1):32–38

Article  Google Scholar 

Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Grani C, Vontobel J, Benz DC, Bacanovic S, Giannopoulos AA, Messerli M et al (2018) Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium scoring using novel scoring thresholds for low tube voltage protocols-a pilot study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19(12):1362–1371

Article  Google Scholar 

McCollough CH, Bruesewitz MR, Kofler JM (2006) CT dose reduction and dose management tools: overview of available options. Radiographics 26(2):503–512

Article  Google Scholar 

Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257(1):158–166

Article  Google Scholar 

de Raadt A, Warrens MJ, Bosker RJ, Kiers HAL (2021) A comparison of reliability coefficients for ordinal rating scales. J Classif 38(3):519–543

Article  Google Scholar 

Chung H, McClelland RL, Katz R, Carr JJ, Budoff MJ (2008) Repeatability limits for measurement of coronary artery calcified plaque with cardiac CT in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(2):W87-92

Article  Google Scholar 

Rutten A, Isgum I, Prokop M (2008) Coronary calcification: effect of small variation of scan starting position on Agatston, volume, and mass scores. Radiology 246(1):90–98

Article  Google Scholar 

Willemink MJ, Vliegenthart R, Takx RA, Leiner T, Budde RP, Bleys RL et al (2014) Coronary artery calcification scoring with state-of-the-art CT scanners from different vendors has substantial effect on risk classification. Radiology 273(3):695–702

Article  Google Scholar 

Xu J, Liu J, Guo N, Chen L, Song W, Guo D et al (2021) Performance of artificial intelligence-based coronary artery calcium scoring in non-gated chest CT. Eur J Radiol 145:110034

Article  Google Scholar 

Vonder M, Zheng S, Dorrius MD, van der Aalst CM, de Koning HJ, Yi J et al (2021) Deep learning for automatic calcium scoring in population-based cardiovascular screening. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 15:366

Article  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif