1. Puymirat, E, Simon, T, Steg, PG, et al. Association of changes in clinical characteristics and management with improvement in survival among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2012; 308: 998–1006.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Helgestad, OKL, Josiassen, J, Hassager, C, et al. Temporal trends in incidence and patient characteristics in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction from 2010 to 2017: A Danish cohort study. Eur J Heart Fail 2019; 21: 1370–1378.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Antoni, ML, Yiu, KH, Atary, JZ, et al. Distribution of culprit lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Coron Artery Dis 2011; 22: 533–536.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Velders, MA, van Boven, N, Boden, H, et al. Association between angiographic culprit lesion and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. Resuscitation 2013; 84: 1530–1535.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Fuernau, G, Fengler, K, Desch, S, et al. Culprit lesion location and outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: A substudy of the IABP-SHOCK II-trial. Clin Res Cardiol 2016; 105: 1030–1041.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Sanborn, TA, Sleeper, LA, Webb, JG, et al. Correlates of one-year survival inpatients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: Angiographic findings from the SHOCK trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 1373–1379.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI7. Hochman, JS, Sleeper, LA, Webb, JG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 625–634.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Trzeciak, P, Gierlotka, M, Gasior, M, et al. Mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock treated by PCI is correlated to the infarct-related artery – results from the PL-ACS Registry. Int J Cardiol 2013; 166: 193–197.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Kundu, A, Sardar, P, Kakouros, N, et al. Outcomes of multivessel vs culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Evidence from an updated meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 94: 70–81.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. De Waha, S, Jobs, A, Eitel, I, et al. Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2018; 7: 28–37.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI11. Schmidt, M, Pedersen, L, Sorensen, HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 2014; 29: 541–549.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI12. Thygesen, K, Alpert, JS, Jaffe, AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J 2018; 40: 237–269.
Google Scholar | Crossref13. Schmidt, M, Maeng, M, Madsen, M, et al. The Western Denmark Heart Registry: Its influence on cardiovascular patient care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71: 1259–1272.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Zeymer, U, Vogt, A, Zahn, R, et al. Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausarzte (ALKK). Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 322–328.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Pedersen, F, Butrymovich, V, Kelbaek, H, et al. Short- and long-term cause of death in patients treated with primary PCI for STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 2101–2108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Obling, L, Frydland, M, Hansen, R, et al. Risk factors of late cardiogenic shock and mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2017; 7: 7–15.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals17. Pedrazzini, GB, Radovanovic, D, Vassalli, G, et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction the AMIS (Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland) plus registry experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 627–633.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Fujii, T, Hasegawa, M, Miyamoto, J, et al. Differences in initial electrocardiographic findings between ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to left main trunk and left anterior descending artery lesions. Int J Emerg Med 2019; 12: 12.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Jacobs, AK, Leopold, JA, Bates, E, et al. Cardiogenic shock caused by right ventricular infarction: A report from the SHOCK registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 1273–1279.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. O’Keefe, JH, Gibbons, RJ. Left circumflex occlusion – underrecognized and undertreated. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2000; 10: 221–225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Waziri, H, Jorgensen, E, Kelbaek, H, et al. Acute myocardial infarction and lesion location in the left circumflex artery: Importance of coronary artery dominance. Eurointervention 2016; 12: 441–448.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Entezarjou, A, Mohammad, MA, Andell, P, et al. Culprit vessel: Impact on short-term and long-term prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Open Heart 2018; 5: e000852.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Conde-Vela, C, Moreno, R, Hernandez, R, et al. Cardiogenic shock at admission in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Related factors. Int J Cardiol 2007; 123: 29–33.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Thiele, H, Akin, I, Sandri, M, et al. PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 2419–2432.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI25. Thiele, H, Zeymer, U, Neumann, FJ, et al. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1287–1296.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Wong, SC, Sanborn, T, Sleeper, LA, et al. Angiographic findings and clinical correlates in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36(3 Suppl. A): 1077–1083.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Khan, MS, Siddiqi, TJ, Usman, MS, et al. Meta-analysis comparing culprit vessel only versus multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Am J Cardiol 2018; 123: 218–226.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Mylotte, D, Morice, MC, Eltchaninoff, H, et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: The role of primary multivessel revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 115–125.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Mehta, SR, Wood, DA, Meeks, B, et al. Design and rationale of the COMPLETE trial: A randomized, comparative effectiveness study of complete versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention to treat multivessel coronary artery disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2019; 215: 157–166.
Google Scholar | Medline