Long-term effects of a standardized feedback-driven quality improvement program for timely reperfusion therapy in regional STEMI care networks

1. Ibanez, B, James, S, Agewall, S, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 119–177.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI2. Duchateau, FX, Devaud, ML, Burnod, A, et al. A quality control programme for acute myocardial infarction management in out-of-hospital critical care medicine. Emerg Med J 2007; 24: 487–488.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Scholz, KH, Hilgers, R, Ahlersmann, D, et al. Contact-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time after initiation of a formalized data feedback in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 46–52.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Kochar, A, Al-Khalidi, HR, Hansen, SM, et al. Delays in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with cardiogenic shock. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11: 1824–1833.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Schiele, F, Gale, CP, Bonnefoy, E, et al. Quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: a position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2017; 6: 34–59.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI6. De Luca, G, Suryapranata, H, Ottervanger, JP, et al. Time delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: Every minute of delay counts. Circulation 2004; 109: 1223–1225.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI7. Bradley, EH, Herrin, J, Wang, Y, et al. Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2308–2320.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Brodie, BR, Webb, J, Cox, DA, et al.; EMERALD Investigators. Impact of time to treatment on myocardial reperfusion and infarct size with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (from the EMERALD Trial). Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 1680–1686.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Terkelsen, CJ, Sørensen, JT, Maeng, M, et al. System delay and mortality among patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 2010; 304: 763–771.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI10. Swaminathan, RV, Wang, TY, Kaltenbach, LA, et al. Nonsystem reasons for delay in door-to-balloon time and associated in-hospital mortality: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 1688–1695.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Schiele, F, Hochadel, M, Tubaro, M, et al. Reperfusion strategy in Europe: temporal trends in performance measures for reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2010; 31: 2614–2624.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI12. Puymirat, E, Simon, T, Cayla, G, et al.; USIK, USIC 2000 and FAST-MI Investigators. Acute myocardial infarction: changes in patient characteristics, management, and 6-month outcomes over a period of 20 years in the FAST-MI Program (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) 1995 to 2015. Circulation 2017; 136: 1908–1919.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Puymirat, E, Cayla, G, Cottin, Y, et al. Twenty-year trends in profile, management and outcomes of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction according to use of reperfusion therapy: Data from the FAST-MI program 1995-2015. Am Heart J 2019; 214: 97–106.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Granger, CB, Bates, ER, Jollis, JG, et al. Improving care of STEMI in the United States 2008 to 2012. A report from the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8: e008096.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Scholz, KH, Maier, SKG, Jung, J, et al. Reduction in treatment times through formalized data feedback: results from a prospective multicenter study of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 848–857.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Scholz, KH, Maier, SKG, Maier, LS, et al. Impact of treatment delay on mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting with and without haemodynamic instability: results from the German prospective, multicentre FITT-STEMI trial. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 1065–1074.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Scholz, KH, Friede, T, Meyer, T, et al. Prognostic significance of emergency department bypass in stable and unstable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2018; 2048872618813907.
Google Scholar | Medline18. Wijns, W, Naber, CK. Reperfusion delay in patients with high-risk ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: every minute counts, much more than suspected. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 1075–1077.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Killip, T, Kimball, JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol 1967; 20: 457–464.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Morrow, DA, Antman, EM, Charlesworth, A, et al. TIMI risk score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, bedside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: An Intravenous nPA for Treatment of Infarcting Myocardium Early II trial substudy. Circulation 2000; 102: 2031–2037.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI21. Bestehorn, K, Bestehorn, M, Fleck, E, et al. Increase of in-hospital mortality of STEMI patients after PCI? A risk-adjusted analysis of German quality assurance data 2008-2013. J Cardiol Cardiovasc Ther 2019; 13.
Google Scholar22. Steg, PG, Cambou, JP, Goldstein, P, et al.; USIC 2000 Investigators. Bypassing the emergency room reduces delays and mortality in ST elevation myocardial infarction: the USIC 2000 registry. Heart 2006; 92: 1378–1383.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI23. Carstensen, S, Nelson, GCI, Hansen, PS, et al. Field triage to primary angioplasty combined with emergency department bypass reduces treatment delays and is associated with improved outcome. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2313–2319.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI24. Bagai, A, Jollis, JG, Dauerman, HL, et al. Emergency department bypass for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients identified with a prehospital electrocardiogram: a report from the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline program. Circulation 2013; 128: 352–359.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Estévez-Loureiro, R, Calviño-Santos, R, López-Sainz, A, et al. Long-term prognostic benefit of field triage and direct transfer of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2013; 111: 1721–1726.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Anderson, LL, French, WJ, Peng, SA, et al. Direct transfer from the referring hospitals to the catheterization laboratory to minimize reperfusion delays for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8: e002477.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Farshid, A, Allada, C, Chandrasekhar, J, et al. Shorter ischaemic time and improved survival with pre-hospital STEMI diagnosis and direct transfer for primary PCI. Heart Lung Circ 2015; 24: 234–240.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI28. Hagiwara, MA, Bremer, A, Claesson, A, et al. The impact of direct admission to a catheterisation lab/CCU in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction on the delay to reperfusion and early risk of death: results of a systematic review including meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2014; 22: 67.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Funder, KS, Rasmussen, LS, Siersma, V, et al. ground transportation of patients bound for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2018; 62: 568–578.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif