1. Anderson, FA, Wheeler, HB, Goldberg, RJ, et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT study. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:933-938.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Silverstein, MD, Heit, JA, Mohr, DN, Petterson, TM, O’Fallon, WM, Melton, LJ. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:585-593.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Spencer, FA, Emery, C, Lessard, D, et al. The Worcester venous thromboembolism study: a population-based study of the clinical epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:722-727.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Konstantinides, SV, Meyer, G, Becattini, C, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur Heart J. 2019;54:1901647.
Google Scholar5. Crawford, F, Andras, A, Welch, K, Sheares, K, Keeling, D, Chappell, FM. D-dimer test for excluding the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016:CD010864.
Google Scholar6. Thachil, J, Lippi, G, Favaloro, EJ. D-Dimer testing: laboratory aspects and current issues. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1646:91-104.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Douma, RA, Tan, M, Schutgens, RE, et al. Using an age-dependent D-dimer cut-off value increases the number of older patients in whom deep vein thrombosis can be safely excluded. Haematologica. 2012;97(10):1507-1513.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Righini, M, Van Es, J, Den Exter, PL, et al. Age-Adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study. JAMA. 2014;311(11):1117-1124.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Senior, K, Burles, K, Wang, D, et al. Age-adjusted D-dimer thresholds in the investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective evaluation in patients ages 50 and older using administrative data. CJEM. 2018;20(5):725-731.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Dutton, J, Dachsel, M, Crane, R. Can the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off value help in our diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism? Clin Med. 2018;18(4):293-296.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Takach Lapner, S, Stevens, SM, Woller, SC, Snow, G, Kearon, C. Age-adjusted versus clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2018;167:15-19.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Sheele, JM, Tang, A, Farhan, O, Morris, N. A retrospective evaluation of the age-adjusted D-dimer versus the conventional D-dimer for pulmonary embolism. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2018;29(3):344-349.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. van der Pol, LM, van der Hulle, T, Cheung, YW, et al. No added value of the age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off to the YEARS algorithm in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2017;15(12):2317-2324.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Monks, D, Neill, A, Barton, D, et al. Age adjusted D-dimer for exclusion of pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study. Ir Med J. 2017;110(7):599.
Google Scholar | Medline15. Nobes, J, Messow, CM, Khan, M, Hrobar, P, Isles, C. Age-adjusted D-dimer excludes pulmonary embolism and reduces unnecessary radiation exposure in older adults: retrospective study. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93(1101):420-424.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Goodwin, AJ, Higgins, RA, Moser, KA, et al. Issues surrounding age-adjusted D-dimer cutoffs that practicing physicians need to know when evaluating patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(5):361-363.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Stein, CE, Keijsers, CJ, Bootsma, JE, Schouten, HJ. Missed diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off value. Age Ageing. 2016;45(6):910-911.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Deeks, JJ, Higgins, JP, Altman, DG. Cochrane statistical methods group. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins, JPT, Thomas, J, Chandler, J, Cumpston, M, Li, T, Page, MJ, et al. (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Online Library; 2019:241-284.
Google Scholar | Crossref19. Whiting, PF, Rutjes, AW, Westwood, ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529-536.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Horita, N, Yamamoto, M, Sato, T, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of Cobas TaqMan MTB real-time polymerase chain reaction for culture-proven Mycobacterium tuberculosis: meta-analysis of 26999 specimens from 17 studies. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18113.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Nwachuku, EL, Balzer, JR, Yabes, JG, Habeych, ME, Crammond, DJ, Thirumala, PD. Diagnostic value of somatosensory evoked potential changes during carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(1):73-80. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3071
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mada/vignettes/mada.pdf
Google Scholar23. Flores, J, García, de, Tena, J, Galipienzo, J, et al. Clinical usefulness and safety of an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to exclude pulmonary embolism: a retrospective analysis. Intern Emerg Med. 2016;11(1):69-75.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Gupta, A, Raja, AS, Ip, IK, Khorasani, R. Assessing 2 D-dimer age-adjustment strategies to optimize computed tomographic use in ED evaluation of pulmonary embolism. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(12):1499-1502.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Fuchs, E, Asakly, S, Karban, A, Tzoran, I. Age-Adjusted cutoff D-dimer level to rule out acute pulmonary embolism: a validation cohort study. Am J Med. 2016;129(8):872-878.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Blondon, M, Le Gal, G, Meyer, G, Righini, M, Robert-Ebadi, H. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(4):865-875.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Polo Friz, H, Pasciuti, L, Meloni, DF, et al. A higher d-dimer threshold safely rules-out pulmonary embolism in very elderly emergency department patients. Thromb Res. 2014;133(3):380-383.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Parry, BA, Chang, AM, Schellong, SM, et al. International, multicenter evaluation of a new D-dimer assay for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism using standard and age-adjusted cut-offs. Thromb Res. 2018;166:63-70.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline