Madhu C, Swift S, Moloney-Geany S, Drake MJ. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system? Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(S6):S39–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23740.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oyama IA, Steinberg AC, Watai TK, Minaglia SM. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification use in the literature. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18(1):35–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0b013e31823bd1ab.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Riss P, Dwyer PL. The POP-Q classification system: looking back and looking forward. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):439–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2311-8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Colaiacomo MC, Masselli G, Polettini E, Lanciotti S, Casciani E, Bertini L, Gualdi G. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2009;29(3):e35. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.e35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gilyadova A, Ishchenko A, Puchkova E, Mershina E, Petrovichev V, Reshetov I. Diagnostic value of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI) of the pelvic floor in genital prolapses. Biomedicines. 2023;11(10):2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102849.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gupta AP, Pandya PR, Nguyen ML, Fashokun T, Macura KJ. Use of dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor in the assessment of anterior compartment disorders. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19(12):112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0862-4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elshazly WG, El Nekady AA, Hassan H. Role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in management of obstructed defecation case series. Int J Surg. 2010;8(4):274–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.008.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Macura KJ, Genadry RR. Female urinary incontinence: pathophysiology, methods of evaluation and role of MR imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(3):371–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9257-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bitti GT, Argiolas GM, Ballicu N, Caddeo E, Cecconi M, Demurtas G, Matta G, Peltz MT, Secci S, Siotto P. Pelvic floor failure: MR imaging evaluation of anatomic and functional abnormalities. Radiographics. 2014;34(2):429–48. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.342125050.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yousuf AA, DeLancey JO, Brandon CJ, Miller JM. Pelvic structure and function at 1 month compared to 7 months by dynamic magnetic resonance after vaginal birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(5):514.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.048.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Madill S, Tang A, Pontbriand-Drolet S, Dumoulin C. Comparison of two methods for measuring the pubococcygeal line from sagittal-plane magnetic resonance imaging. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(8):1613–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21079.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Picchia S, Rengo M, Bellini D, Caruso D, Pironti E, Floris R, Laghi A. Dynamic MR of the pelvic floor: influence of alternative methods to draw the pubococcygeal line (PCL) on the grading of pelvic floor descent. Eur J Radiol Open. 2019;20(6):187–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2019.05.002.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kobi M, Flusberg M, Paroder V, Chernyak V. Practical guide to dynamic pelvic floor MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(5):1155–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25998.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El Sayed RF, Alt CD, Maccioni F, Meissnitzer M, Masselli G, Manganaro L, Vinci V, Weishaupt D; ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group. Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction—joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR pelvic floor working group. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):2067–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4471-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Woon JT, Perumal V, Maigne JY, Stringer MD. CT morphology and morphometry of the normal adult coccyx. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(4):863–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2595-2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bø K, Lilleås F, Talseth T, Hedland H. Dynamic MRI of the pelvic floor muscles in an upright sitting position. Neurourol Urodyn. 2001;20(2):167–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70243-0.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A, Goldman HB, Huser M, Milani AL, Moran PA, Schaer GN, Withagen MI. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP). Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(2):137–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22922.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim SR, Suh DH, Jeon MJ. Current use of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in clinical practice among Korean obstetrician-gynecologists. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01354-w.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Horvath I, Polišenská M, Huser M. Modern terminology and classification of female pelvic organ prolapse. Ceska Gynekol. 2020;85(2):133–8. English.

PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Swamy N, Bajaj G, Olliphant SS, Henry JA, Jambhekar K, Pandey T, Ram R. Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(4):1381–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02476-9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lin FC, Funk JT, Tiwari HA, Kalb BT, Twiss CO. Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse compared to physical examination findings. Urology. 2018;119:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.031.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pollock GR, Twiss CO, Chartier S, Vedantham S, Funk J, Arif TH. Comparison of magnetic resonance defecography grading with POP-Q staging and Baden-Walker grading in the evaluation of female pelvic organ prolapse. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(4):1373–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02313-8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jha P, Sarawagi R, Malik R, Kumar A, Pushpalatha K. Static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in female pelvic floor dysfunction: correlation with pelvic organ prolapse quantification. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e44915. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44915.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Van der Steen A, Jochem KY, Consten ECJ, Simonis FFJ, Grob ATM. POP-Q versus upright MRI distance measurements: a prospective study in patients with POP. Int Urogynecol J. 2024;35(6):1255–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05802-7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu Z, Sharen G, Wang P, Chen L, Tan L. Clinical and pelvic floor ultrasound characteristics of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after transvaginal mesh pelvic reconstruction. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01686-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shi W, Guo L. Risk factors for the recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse: a meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;43(1):2160929. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2022.2160929.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schulten SFM, Claas-Quax MJ, Weemhoff M, van Eijndhoven HW, van Leijsen SA, Vergeldt TF, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(2):192–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.046.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar