The Relative Importance of Attractiveness and Intelligence to the Mate Preferences and Choices of Women and Their Parents

Agey, Morris, A., Chandy, M., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2021). Arranged marriage often subverts offspring mate choice: An HRAF-based study. American Anthropologist, 123(4), 861–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13656

Article  Google Scholar 

Apostolou, M. (2008). Parent-offspring conflict over mating: The case of beauty. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600207

Article  Google Scholar 

Apostolou, M. (2009). Parental in-law and individual mate choice co-evolution: Do parents and offspring prefer in-laws and spouses who are acceptable by each other? Journal of Social Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 3(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099322

Article  Google Scholar 

Apostolou, M. (2011). Parent-offspring conflict over mating: Testing the tradeoffs hypothesis. Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 470–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491100900401

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Apostolou, M. (2015). Parent–offspring conflict over mating: Domains of agreement and disagreement. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704915604561

Article  Google Scholar 

Apostolou, M. (2017). The nature of parent-offspring conflict over mating: From differences in genetic relatedness to disagreement over mate choice. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0066-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Apostolou, M. (2020). Parent-offspring conflict. In T. K. Shackelford, & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Handbook of Evolutionary psychology (pp. 155–169). Sage.

Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055756

Article  Google Scholar 

Bovet, J., Raiber, E., Ren, W., Wang, C., & Seabright, P. (2018). Parent–offspring conflict over mate choice: An experimental study in China. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12319

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brehm, J. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041006

Article  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992

Article  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 491–503.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buunk, A. P., & Solano, A. C. (2010). Conflicting preferences of parents and offspring over criteria for a mate: A study in Argentina. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020252

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Campbell, W. K. (1999). Narcissism and romantic attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1254–1270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1254

Article  Google Scholar 

Chang, L., Wang, Y., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2011). Chinese mate preferences: Cultural evolution and continuity across a quarter of a century. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 678–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.016

Article  Google Scholar 

Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000054

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Diamond, L. M., Alley, J., Dickenson, J., & Blair, K. L. (2020). Who counts as sexually fluid? Comparing four different types of sexual fluidity in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(7), 2389–2403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01565-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dubbs, S. L., & Buunk, A. P. (2010). Sex differences in parental preferences over a child’s mate choice: A daughter’s perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(8), 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510378666

Article  Google Scholar 

Dubbs, S. L., Buunk, A. P., & Taniguchi, H. (2013). Parent-offspring conflict in Japan and parental influence across six cultures. Japanese Psychological Research, 55(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12003

Article  Google Scholar 

Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Finkel, E. J., & Johnson, S. E. (2011). Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: A double dissociation in predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 993–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024061

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eastwick, P. W., Sparks, J., Finkel, E. J., Meza, E. M., Adamkovič, M., Adu, P., Ai, T., Akintola, A. A., Al-Shawaf, L., Apriliawati, D., Arriaga, P., Aubert-Teillaud, B., Baník, G., Barzykowski, K., Batres, C., Baucom, K. J., Beaulieu, E. Z., Behnke, M., Butcher, N., Charles, D. Y., ... Coles, N. A. (2024 - forthcoming). A worldwide test of the predictive validity of ideal partner preference-matching. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593

Article  Google Scholar 

Fletcher, G. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2000). Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.933

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fugère, M. A., Chabot, C., Doucette, K., & Cousins, A. J. (2017). The importance of physical attractiveness to the mate choices of women and their mothers. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0092-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Fugère, M. A., Doucette, K., Chabot, C., & Cousins, A. J. (2017). Similarities and differences in mate preferences among parents and their adult children. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.057

Article  Google Scholar 

Fugère, M. A., Madden, S., & Cousins, A. J. (2019). The relative importance of physical attractiveness and personality characteristics to the mate choices of women and their fathers. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-019-00195-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Fugère, M. A., Ciccarelli, N. C., & Cousins, A. J. (2023). The importance of physical attractiveness and ambition/intelligence to the mate choices of women and their parents. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000325

Article  Google Scholar 

Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337X

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gebauer, J. E., Leary, M. R., & Neberich, W. (2012). Big two personality and big three mate preferences: Similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1579–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212456300

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Griffin, A. M., & Langlois, J. H. (2006). Stereotype directionality and attractiveness stereotyping: Is beauty good or is ugly bad? Social Cognition, 24(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.2.187

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guo, Q., Li, Y., & Yu, S. (2017). In-law and mate preferences in Chinese society and the role of traditional cultural values. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917730518

Hasnain, A. M., & Snopkowski, K. (2024). Maternal investment in arranged and self-choice marriages: A test of the reproductive compensation and differential allocation hypothesis in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 45(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.11.004

Article  Google Scholar 

Hunt, L. L., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2015). Leveling the playing field: Longer acquaintance predicts reduced assortative mating on attractiveness. Psychological Science, 26(7), 1046–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615579273

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Johnson, D. J., & Rusbult, C. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 967–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967

Article 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif