Changes in pulse pressure variation induced by passive leg raising test to predict preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with low tidal volume in ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Acheampong A, Vincent JL. A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):251.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sakr Y, Rubatto Birri PN, Kotfis K, Nanchal R, Shah B, Kluge S, Schroeder ME, Marshall JC, Vincent JL. Higher fluid balance increases the risk of death from sepsis: results from a large international audit. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):386–94.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795–815.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121(6):2000–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alvarado Sánchez JI, Caicedo Ruiz JD, Diaztagle Fernández JJ, Cruz Martínez LE, Carreño Hernández FL, Santacruz Herrera CA, Ospina-Tascón GA. Variables influencing the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):361.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(1):134–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL. Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(9):1195–201.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L, Perbet S, Zieleskiewicz L, Bart F, Veber B, Paugam-Burtz C, Jaber S, Ayham A, et al. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(4):681–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(4):517–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefèvre D, Runge I, Legras A, Dequin PF, Mercier E, Wolff M, Régnier B, Boulain T. Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R85.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alvarado Sánchez JI, Caicedo Ruiz JD, Diaztagle Fernández JJ, Amaya Zuñiga WF, Ospina-Tascón GA, Cruz Martínez LE. Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care. 2021;11(1):28.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(12):1935–47.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cherpanath TG, Hirsch A, Geerts BF, Lagrand WK, Leeflang MM, Schultz MJ, Groeneveld AB. Predicting fluid responsiveness by passive leg raising: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 clinical trials. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(5):981–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferré A, Dres M, Gharbi R, Richard C, Teboul JL. Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(1):152–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taccheri T, Gavelli F, Teboul JL, Shi R, Monnet X. Do changes in pulse pressure variation and inferior vena cava distensibility during passive leg raising and tidal volume challenge detect preload responsiveness in case of low tidal volume ventilation? Crit Care. 2021;25(1):110.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hamzaoui O, Shi R, Carelli S, Sztrymf B, Prat D, Jacobs F, Monnet X, Gouëzel C, Teboul JL. Changes in pulse pressure variation to assess preload responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity: an observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2021;127(4):532–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elsayed AI, Selim KA, Zaghla HE, Mowafy HE, Fakher MA. Comparison of changes in PPV using a tidal volume challenge with a passive leg raising test to predict fluid responsiveness in patients ventilated using low tidal volume. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021;25(6):685–90.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mallat J, Fischer MO, Granier M, Vinsonneau C, Jonard M, Mahjoub Y, Baghdadi FA, Préau S, Poher F, Rebet O, et al. Passive leg raising-induced changes in pulse pressure variation to assess fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a multicentre prospective observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129(3):308–16.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xie J, Xu L, Peng K, Chen J, Wan J. Comparison between changes in systolic-pressure variation and pulse-pressure variation after passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative critically ill patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024;38(2):459–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):18.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alberg AJ, Park JW, Hager BW, Brock MV, Diener-West M. The use of “overall accuracy” to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(5 Pt 1):460–5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Kunz R, Craig J, Montori VM, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ. 2008;336(7653):1106–10.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20(19):2865–84.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fischer JE, Bachmann LM, Jaeschke R. A readers’ guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(7):1043–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Field AP. Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychol Methods. 2001;6(2):161–80.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Riley RD, Abrams KR, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC, Thompson JR. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moses LE, Shapiro D, Littenberg B. Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary ROC curve: data-analytic approaches and some additional considerations. Stat Med. 1993;12(14):1293–316.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Winter JC, Gosling SD, Potter J. Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: a tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychol Methods. 2016;21(3):273–90.

Article  PubMed 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif