Abdulmajeed AA, Lim KG, Närhi TO, Cooper LF. Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115:672–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Castillo-Oyagüe R, Suárez-García MJ, Perea C, Río JD, Lynch CD, Gonzalo E, et al. Validation of a new, specific, complete, and short OHRQoL scale (QoLFAST-10) for wearers of implant overdentures and fixed-detachable hybrid prostheses. J Dent. 2016;49:22–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Papaspyridakos P, Bordin TB, Natto ZS, Kim YJ, El-Rafie K, Tsigarida A, et al. Double full-Arch fixed Implant-supported prostheses: outcomes and complications after a Mean Follow-Up of 5 years. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:387–97.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Riemann M, Wachtel H, Beuer F, Bolz W, Schuh P, Niedermaier R, et al. Biologic and Technical complications of Implant-supported immediately loaded fixed full-arch prostheses: an evaluation of up to 6 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34:1482–92.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cappare P, Sannino G, Minoli M, Montemezzi P, Ferrini F. Conventional versus digital impressions for full arch screw-retained maxillary rehabilitations: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5): 829.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Francetti L, Rodolfi A, Barbaro B, Taschieri S, Cavalli N, Corbella S. Implant success rates in full-arch rehabilitations supported by upright and tilted implants: a retrospective investigation with up to five years of follow-up. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015;45(6):210–5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Wu P, Liu HL, Zhang L, Liu LP, Ma CF, et al. Polyetheretherketone versus titanium CAD-CAM framework for implant-supported fixed complete dentures: a retrospective study with up to 5-year follow-up. J Prosthodont Res. 2022;66:279–87.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Delucchi F, De Giovanni E, Pesce P, Bagnasco F, Pera F, Baldi D, et al. Framework materials for full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: a systematic review of Clinical studies. Mater (Basel). 2021;14:3251.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cevik P, Schimmel M, Yilmaz B. New generation CAD-CAM materials for implant-supported definitive frameworks fabricated by using subtractive technologies. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:3074182. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3074182.

Yu W, Li X, Ma X, Xu X. Biomechanical analysis of inclined and cantilever design with different implant framework materials in mandibular complete-arch implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127:e7831-7810.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ferreira MB, Barão VA, Faverani LP, Hipólito AC, Assunção WG. The role of superstructure material on the stress distribution in mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. A CT-based 3D-FEA. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;35:92–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takanashi K, Alfarsi H, Chee WWL, Moshaverinia A. CAD-CAM acrylic resin prosthesis superstructure: a technique for fabricating an implant-supported fixed complete denture. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121:378–80.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Korsch M, Walther W, Hannig M, Bartols A. Evaluation of the surgical and prosthetic success of all-on-4 restorations: a retrospective cohort study of provisional vs. definitive immediate restorations. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7:48.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pradhan KK, Chakraverty S. Computational structural mechanics. Cambridge: Academic; 2019. p. 25–8.

Book  Google Scholar 

Falcinelli C, Valente F, Vasta M, Traini T. Finite element analysis in implant dentistry: state of the art and future directions. Dent Mater. 2023;39:539–56.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moreira de Melo EJ Jr, Francischone CE. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of two angled narrow-diameter implant designs for an all-on-4 prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:477–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tezerişener HA, Özalp Ö, Altay MA, Sindel A. Comparison of stress distribution around all-on-four implants of different angulations and zygoma implants: a 7-model finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):176.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Patil PG, Seow LL, Uddanwadikar R, Pau A, Ukey PD. Stress and strain patterns of 2-implant mandibular overdentures with different positions and angulations of implants: a 3D finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;130(4):586–96.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bozyel D, Taşar Faruk S. Biomechanical Behavior of all-on-4 and M-4 configurations in an Atrophic Maxilla: a 3D finite element Method. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e929908.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee H, Jo M, Sailer I, Noh G. Effects of implant diameter, implant-abutment connection type, and bone density on the biomechanical stability of implant components and bone: a finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(4):716–28.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elsayyad AA, Abbas NA, AbdelNabi NM, Osman RB. Biomechanics of 3-implant-supported and 4-implant-supported mandibular screw-retained prostheses: a 3D finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:e681-610.

Article  Google Scholar 

Anitua E, Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra N, Saracho Rotaeche L. Implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous mandible: biomechanical analysis of different implant configurations via finite element analysis. Dent J (Basel). 2022;11:4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang WT, Cheng KJ, Liu YF, Wang R, Chen YF, Ding YD, Yang F, Wang LH. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):431.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shen L, Dong C, Chen J, Bai X, Yang F, Wang L. The mechanical and clinical influences of prosthetic index structure in Morse taper implant-abutment connection: a scoping review. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):775.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hibbeler RC. Structural analysis. London: Pearson Education; 2019. p. 18–96.

Google Scholar 

Hibbeler RC. Statics and mechanics of materials. Hoboken: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2014. p. 261–307.

Google Scholar 

Sun X, Cheng K, Liu Y, Ke S, Zhang W, Wang L, Yang F. Biomechanical comparison of all-on-4 and all-on-5 implant-supported prostheses with alteration of anterior-posterior spread: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11: 1187504.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brinson HF, Brinson LC. Stress and strain analysis and measurement. In: Polymer engineering science and viscoelasticity. Boston, Springer.2015:15–55.

Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-four immediate-function concept with Brånemark System implants for completely edentulous mandibles: a retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5(Suppl 1):2–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pietrokovski J, Starinsky R, Arensburg B, Kaffe I. Morphologic characteristics of bony edentulous jaws. J Prosthodont. 2007;16:141–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş I, Kilic K, Bal B, Kilavuz A. Finite element analysis of the stress distribution associated with different Implant designs for different bone densities. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(7):614–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee H, Jo M, Noh G. Biomechanical effects of dental implant diameter, connection type, and bone density on microgap formation and fatigue failure: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;200:105863.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nuño N, Amabili M, Groppetti R, Rossi A. Static coefficient of friction between Ti-6Al-4V and PMMA for cemented hip and knee implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59:191–200.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Mauderli A, Lundeen HC, Walsh EK. Limits of human bite strength. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;56:226–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eraslan R, Yagci F, Esim E. Single implant retained overdentures: evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2024;33(4):348–57.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar