The Effect of Anterior Colporrhaphy: A Prospective Study Comparing POP-Q and Upright MRI

Richtlijnendatabase.nl [Internet]. Nederland: Richtlijnen database. Richtlijn Prolapse. https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/prolaps/chirurgische_behandeling_vaginale_prolaps.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2024.

Altman D, Väyrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C, Altman D, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1826–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009521.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Visco AG, Wei JT, McClure LA, Handa VL, Nygaard IE. Effects of examination technique modifications on pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14(2):136–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-002-1030-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chaudhuri S, Vaitheeswari J. Correlation of preoperative and intraoperative assessment of pelvic organ prolapse by pelvic organ prolapse quantification system. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;157(2):466–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13894.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Teleman P, Laurikainen E, Kinne I, Pogosean R, Jakobsson U, Rudnicki M. Relationship between the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(2):195–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2434-6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van der Steen A, Jochem KY, Consten ECJ, Simonis FFJ, Grob ATM. POP-Q versus upright MRI distance measurements: a prospective study in patients with POP. Int Urogynecol J. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05802-7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stothers L, Locke JA, Abdulaziz M, Lazare D, Kavanagh A, Macnab A. Standing open magnetic resonance imaging improves detection and staging of pelvic organ prolapse. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022;16(1):E20–4. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7244.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grob ATM, OldeHeuvel J, Futterer JJ, Massop D, Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven AL, Simonis FFJ, et al. Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position, based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(11):1939–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-03862-0.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundif GW, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1467–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70091-1.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morsinkhof LM, Schulten MK, DeLancey JOL, Simonis FFJ, Grob ATM. Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(10):2801–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05289-0.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1069-5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kohli N, Sze EH, Roat TW, Karram MM. Incidence of recurrent cystocele after anterior colporrhaphy with and without concomitant transvaginal needle suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1476–80; discussion 1480–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70093-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Diez-Itza I, Avila M, Uranga S, Belar M, Lekuona A, Martin A. Factors involved in prolapse recurrence one year after anterior vaginal repair. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):2027–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04468-1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dee Castro EB, Juliato CR, Piedemonte LA, dos Santos Júnior LC. Impact of sacrospinous colpopexy associated with anterior colporrhaphy for the treatment of dome prolapse on all three vaginal compartments. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016;38(2):77–81. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1571264.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Enklaar RA, Knapen FMFM, Schulten SFM, van Osch LADM, van Leijsen SAL, Gondrie ETCM, et al. The modified Manchester Fothergill procedure compared with vaginal hysterectomy with low uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: long-term outcome. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):155–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05240-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Enklaar RA, Schulten SFM, van Eijndhoven HWF, Weemhoff M, van Leijsen SAL, van der Weide MC, et al. Manchester procedure vs sacrospinous hysteropexy for treatment of uterine descent: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330(7):626–35. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.13140.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bowen ST, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD, Luchristt DH, Meyer I, Rardin CR, Harvie HS, Hahn ME, Mazloomdoost D, Iyer P, Carper B, Gantz MG, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Vaginal morphology and position associated with prolapse recurrence after vaginal surgery: a secondary analysis of the DEMAND study. BJOG. 2024;131(3):267–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17620.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Belayneh T, Gebeyehu A, Adefris M, Rortveit G, Gjerde JL, Ayele TA. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery and health-related quality of life: a follow-up study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01146-8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Swift SE, Herring M. Comparison of pelvic organ prolapse in the dorsal lithotomy compared with the standing position. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;6:961–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00111-2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Grob ATM, OldeHeuvel J, Futterer JJ, Massop D, Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven AL, Simonis FFJ, van der Vaart CH. Underestimation of pelvic organ prolapse in the supine straining position, based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(11):1939–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-03862-0.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ghafoor S, Beintner-Skawran S, Betschart C, Winklehner T, Reiner CS. Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse with the Pelvic Inclination Correction System: defining the normal range and threshold to pathology. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024;49(6):1996–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04222-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif