Johnson DE, Cromeens DM, Price RE (1992) Use of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. Lasers Surg Med 12:353–363
Traxer O, Keller EX (2019) Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Haas CR, Knoedler MA, Li S et al (2023) Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG laser vs the Thulium fiber laser for renal and ureteral stones: a single-center prospective randomized clinical trial. J Urol 209:374–383. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003050
Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P et al (2022) Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol 0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027
Uleri A, Farré A, Izquierdo P et al (2024) Thulium Fiber Laser Versus Holmium:Yttrium Aluminum Garnet for Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.011. 0302-2838(24)00012–5
Panthier F, Abid N, Hoznek A et al (2023) 2022 recommendations of the AFU lithiasis committee: laser - utilization and settings. Progres En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol 33:825–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2023.08.008
EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis A, Davis NF, Geraghty R, Lombardo R (2022) In: Skolarikos A, Neisius A, Petřík B, Somani K, Thomas G (eds) Gambaro (Consultant nephrologist) Guidelines Associates. R. Shepherd, L. Tzelves Guidelines Office
Ventimiglia E, Doizi S, Kovalenko A et al (2020) Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using Holmium:YAG and Super Pulse Thulium Fiber lasers. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15079
Panthier F, Ventimiglia E, Traxer O et al (2023) Lasers and Stones: Towards an Approach that Depends on the Stone Type? A Point of View from PEARLS Members. Eur Urol S 0302–2838(23):03225–03226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.10.023
Aldoukhi AH, Roberts WW, Hall TL, Ghani KR (2019) Watch your distance: the role of laser fiber working distance on fragmentation when altering pulse width or modulation. J Endourol 33:120–126. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0572
Chicaud M, Corrales M, Kutchukian S et al (2023) Thulium:YAG laser: a good compromise between holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser for endoscopic lithotripsy? A narrative review. World J Urol 41:3437–3447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04679-3
Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A (2021) Temperature assessment of a novel pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared with a Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet laser. J Endourol 35:853–859. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0803
Kraft L, Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A (2022) In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci 37:2071–2078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03495-8
Petzold R, Miernik A, Suarez-Ibarrola R (2021) Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03668-8
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kwok J-L, Ventimiglia E, De Coninck V et al (2023) Pulsed thulium:YAG laser-ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? Results from a PEARLS analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04549-y
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Panthier F, Solano C, Chicaud M et al (2023) Initial clinical experience with the pulsed solid-state thulium YAG laser from Dornier during RIRS: first 25 cases. World J Urol 41:2119–2125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04501-0
Proietti S, Marchioni M, Oo MM et al (2024) Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with the pulsed Thulium:Yttrium aluminum garnet laser Thulio: preliminary results from a prospective study. Eur Urol Open Sci 67:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.114
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cano-García MC, Abad Rodríguez-Hesles C, Yuste-Mascarós V, Arrabal Polo MÁ (2024) Initial results of pulsed thulium fiber laser (Dornier®) for the treatment of renal and ureteral stones with ureteroscopy. Actas Urol Esp 48:484–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuroe.2024.04.004
Brisbane W, Bailey MR, Sorensen MD (2016) An overview of kidney stone imaging techniques. Nat Rev Urol 13:654–662. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2016.154
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J et al (2012) 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 30:1323–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Panthier F, Traxer O, Yonneau L et al (2021) Evaluation of a free 3D software for kidney stones’ surgical planning: kidney stone calculator a pilot study. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03671-z
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sierra A, Corrales M, Piñero A, Traxer O (2022) Thulium fiber laser pre-settings during ureterorenoscopy: Twitter’s experts’ recommendations. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03966-9
Sierra A, Corrales M, Piñero A et al (2022) Glossary of pre-settings given by laser companies: no consensus! World J Urol 40:2313–2321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04090-4
Weiss B, Shah O (2016) Evaluation of dusting versus basketing - can new technologies improve stone-free rates? Nat Rev Urol 13:726–733. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2016.172
Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S et al (2020) What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03178-z
Kwok J-L, De Coninck V, Ventimiglia E et al (2023) Laser Ablation Efficiency, Laser Ablation Speed, and Laser Energy Consumption During Lithotripsy: What Are They and How Are They Defined? A Systematic Review and Proposal for a Standardized Terminology. Eur Urol Focus S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.004. 2405-4569(23)00222–5
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Somani BK, Desai M, Traxer O, Lahme S (2014) Stone-free rate (SFR): a new proposal for defining levels of SFR. Urolithiasis 42:95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0630-3
Professionals S-OEAU, Guidelines Urolithiasis. In: Uroweb. https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/. Accessed 21 Sep 2020
Panthier F, Doizi S, Lapouge P et al (2020) Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 μm and 272 μm laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03186-z
(2016) American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery Abstracts. Lasers Surg Med 48:1–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22485
Ventimiglia E, Robesti D, Bevilacqua L et al (2023) What to expect from the novel pulsed thulium:YAG laser? A systematic review of endourological applications. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04580-z
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Solano C, Candela L, Panthier F et al (2023) Initial experience with the graphical user interface for laser parameters setting of a new thulium fibre laser source device for urinary pathologies treatment. World J Urol 41:3765–3771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04631-5
Bergmann J, Rosenbaum CM, Netsch C et al (2023) First clinical experience of a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium:YAG laser during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Clin Med 12:2588. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072588
留言 (0)