Parks AG, Nicholls RJ (1978) Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ 2:85. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.2.6130.85

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG, Constantinides V et al (2007) Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 9:310–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01093.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG et al (2006) A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 244(1):18–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000225031.15405.a3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cullen JJ, Kelly KA (1994) Prospectively evaluating anal sphincter function after ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis. Am J Surg 167:558–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(94)90097-3

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simillis C, Afxentiou T, Pellino G et al (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing adverse events and functional outcomes of different pouch designs after restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis 20:664–675. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14104

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bharucha AE, Basilisco G, Malcolm A et al (2022) Review of the indications, methods, and clinical utility of anorectal manometry and the rectal balloon expulsion test. Neurogastroenterol Motil 34(9):e14335. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14335

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carrington EV, Heinrich H, Knowles CH et al (2020) The International Anorectal Physiology Working Group (IAPWG) recommendations: standardized testing protocol and the London classification for disorders of anorectal function. Neurogastroenterol Mot 32(1):e13679. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13679

Article  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Veritas Health Innovation (2024) Covidence systematic review software. Available at www.covidence.org

Jelicic Kadic A, Vucic K, Dosenovic S et al (2016) Extracting data from figures with software was faster, with higher interrater reliability than manual extraction. J Clin Epidemiol 74:119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huwaldt JA. Plot Digitizer 2.6.11 (2024). Available from http://plotdigitizer.sourceforge.net

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:I4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Article  Google Scholar 

Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D et al (2000) The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available from https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

National Institute for Health and Care Research PROSPERO–International prospective register of systematic review. Available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/

Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T (2018) Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res 27:1785–1805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216669183

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 19(14):135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135

Article  Google Scholar 

Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J et al (2023) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.4. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org

StataCorp (2024) Stata statistical software version 18. Available from www.stata.com

Barker TH, Migliavaca CB, Stein C et al (2021) Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence. BMC Med Res Methodol 21(1):189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01381-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McMaster University and Evidence Prime (2022) GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro guideline development tool. Available from https://gradepro.org

Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.315.7109.629

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Halverson AL, Hull TL, Remzi F et al (2002) Perioperative resting pressure predicts long-term postoperative function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 6:316–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00072-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lindquist K (1990) Anal manometry with microtransducer technique before and after restorative proctocolectomy–sphincter function and clinical correlations. Dis Colon Rectum 33:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055534

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morgado PJ, Wexner SD, James K et al (1994) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is preoperative anal manometry predictive of postoperative functional outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 37:224–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02048159

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Braun J, Treutner KH, Harder M et al (1991) Anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 34:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050200

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DCC (1994) Recovery of the internal anal sphincter and continence after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 81:1065–1068. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800810748

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jorge JMN, Wexner SD, Morgado PJ et al (1994) Optimization of sphincter function after the ileoanal reservoir procedure–a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 37:419–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02076184

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Luukkonen P (1988) Manometric follow-up of anal sphincter function after an ileo-anal pouch procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:43–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01649683

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pescatori M, Parks AG (1984) The sphincteric and sensory components of preserved continence after ileoanal reservoir. Surg Gynecol Obstet 158:517–521

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Öresland T, Fasth S, Hultén L et al (1988) Does balloon dilatation and anal sphincter training improve ileoanal-pouch function? Int J Colorectal Dis 3:153–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648358

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hallgren T, Fasth S, Nordgren S et al (1989) Manovolumetric characteristics and functional results in three different pelvic pouch designs. Int J Colorectal Dis 4:156–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01649693

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams NS, Marzouk DEMM, Hallan RI, Waldron DJ (1989) Function after ileal pouch and stapled pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 76:1168–1171. https://doi.org/10.1002/BJS.1800761119

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Becker JM, McGrath KM, Meagher MP et al (1991) Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surgery 110:718–725

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio V et al (1991) Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg 161:90–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(91)90366-L

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wexner SD, James K, Jagelman DG (1991) The double-stapled ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis. A prospective review of sphincter function and clinical outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 34:487–494.