Study GB (2021) Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the right to Sight: an analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Glob Health 9(2):e144–e160

Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY et al (2014) Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121(11):2081–2090

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Allison K, Patel D, Alabi O (2020) Epidemiology of Glaucoma: the past, Present, and predictions for the future. Cureus 12(11):e11686

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tarcoveanu F, Leon F, Curteanu S et al (2022) Classification Algorithms Used in Predicting Glaucoma Progression. Healthc (Basel) 10(10):1831

Google Scholar 

Zeng Z, You M, Fan C et al (2023) Pathologically high intraocular pressure induces mitochondrial dysfunction through Drp1 and leads to retinal ganglion cell PANoptosis in glaucoma. Redox Biol 62:102687

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jayaram H, Kolko M, Friedman DS, Gazzard G (2023) Glaucoma: now and beyond. Lancet 402(10414):1788–1801

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mahabadi N, Foris LA, Tripathy K (2024) Open Angle Glaucoma, in StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL) ineligible companies. Disclosure: Lisa Foris declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies. Disclosure: Koushik Tripathy declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies

Michels TC, Ivan O (2023) Glaucoma: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 107(3):253–262

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seibold LK, SooHoo JR, Kahook MY (2015) Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 22(1):18–24

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Uram M (1992) Ophthalmic laser microendoscope ciliary process ablation in the management of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology 99(12):1823–1828

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sunderland DK, Sapra A, Physiology AH, Circulation in StatPearls. 2024, StatPearls Publishing. Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL) ineligible companies. Disclosure: Amit Sapra declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies

Cheung CY, Li SL, Chan PP et al (2020) Intraocular pressure control and visual field changes in primary angle closure disease: the CUHK PACG Longitudinal (CUPAL) study. Br J Ophthalmol 104(5):629–635

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Francis BA, Flowers B, Dastiridou A et al (2019) Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and other Cyclodestructive methods: histopathologic comparison of in vivo treatment in humans and monkeys. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2(6):413–421

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dastiridou AI, Katsanos A, Denis P et al (2018) Cyclodestructive procedures in Glaucoma: a review of current and emerging options. Adv Ther 35(12):2103–2127

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zheng XL, Lin HS, Wang XJ et al (2023) Effect of low dose laser cycloplasty on deepening anterior chamber in chronic angle-closure glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol 16(12):2011–2017

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Islam Y, Sherwood M, Blake CR (2020) The indications for minimally invasive Glaucoma surgery, trabeculectomy, tube shunts, and cyclophotocoagulation in Glaucoma surgery. Adv Ophthalmol Optometry 5:147–170

Article  Google Scholar 

Tanito M, Manabe SI, Hamanaka T, Sato H, Mori K (2020) A case series of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation with 532-nm laser in Japanese patients with refractory glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 34(3):507–514

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anand N, Klug E, Nirappel A, Solá-Del Valle D (2020) A review of Cyclodestructive procedures for the Treatment of Glaucoma. Semin Ophthalmol 35(5–6):261–275

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ariga M, Nivean PD, Nivean VG, Madanagopalan, Mohan S (2021) Micropulse trans-scleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: an initial experience in Indian eyes. Int Ophthalmol 41(8):2639–2645

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lima FE, Geraissate JC, Ávila MP (2023) A multicenter prospective comparative study evaluating cataract surgery and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation either with or without iStent inject implantation in Brazilian patients with glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 43(5):1665–1676

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feinberg L, Swampillai AJ, Byles D, Smith M (2023) Six year outcomes of combined phacoemulsification surgery and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 261(5):1339–1347

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ng VWK, Chan JCW, Li KKW (2022) Association between endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and vitreous prolapse in trabeculectomy: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol 22(1):143

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wiącek MP, Miszczuk T, Lipiński A, Machalińska A (2021) Safety and efficacy of isolated endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in Pseudophakic patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma-12-Month Follow-Up. J Clin Med, 10(18)

Nirappel A, Klug E, Neeson C et al (2023) Transscleral vs endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation: safety and efficacy when combined with phacoemulsification. BMC Ophthalmol 23(1):129

Alasbali T (2023) Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for glaucoma compared to alternative procedures -A systematic review. Oman J Ophthalmol 16(2):211–219

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bicket AK, Le JT, Azuara-Blanco A et al (2021) Minimally invasive Glaucoma Surgical techniques for Open-Angle Glaucoma: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol 139(9):983–989

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Uram M (1995) Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in glaucoma management. 6(2):19–29

Francis BA, Berke SJ, Dustin L, Noecker R (2014) Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in medically controlled glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(8):1313–1321

Kumar H, Mansoori T, Warjri GB et al (2018) Lasers in glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 66(11):1539–1553

Sherman T, Rodrigues IAS, Goyal S et al (2023) Comparing the effectiveness of phacoemulsification + endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation laser versus phacoemulsification alone for the treatment of primary Open Angle Glaucoma in patients with cataract (CONCEPT): study methodology. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 6(5):474–479

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mohammadi M, Daraby M, Eslami Y et al (2023) One-year outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and viscogoniosynechialysis with and without endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in primary angle-closure glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 43(9):3227–3236

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li J, Zhang S, Hou B (2023) Outcomes of vitrectomy, complete pan-retinal photocoagulation, and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation surgery after anti-VEGF treatment in neovascular glaucoma. Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res 3(3):112–118

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Glaser TS, Mulvihill MS, Freedman SF (2019) Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) for childhood glaucoma: a large single-center cohort experience. J Aapos, 23(2): p. 84.

Article  Google Scholar 

Qidwai U, Jones L, Ratnarajan G (2022) A comparison of iStent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with the PreserFlo MicroShunt and XEN-45 implants. Ther Adv Ophthalmol 14:25158414221125697

Lima FE, Neto JB, Toscano D, Carvalho DMd (2009) d. Ávila, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucomas: a long term study. Rev Bras Oftalmol 68(3):146–151

Sun W, Yu CY, Tong JP (2018) A review of combined phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation: efficacy and safety. Int J Ophthalmol 11(8):1396–1402

Alzuhairy S, Albahlal A, Aljadaan I et al (2016) Intraocular pressure outcomes following Transscleral Diode Cyclophotocoagulation using long and Short Duration Burns. J Glaucoma, 25(9):82.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rodrigues IAS, Bloch E, Lim WS, Goyal S (2020) Phacoemulsification Combined with Endoscopic Versus Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in poorly controlled Glaucoma: a comparative Case Series. J Glaucoma 29(1):53–59

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morales J, Al Qahtani M, Khandekar R et al (2015) Intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation for advanced Glaucoma: 1-Year outcomes. J Glaucoma 24(6):e157–e162

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cantor AJ, Wang J, Li S, Neely DE, Plager DA (2018) Long-term efficacy of endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation in the management of glaucoma following cataract surgery in children. J Aapos 22(3):188–191

Kahook MY, Lathrop KL, Noecker RJ (2007) One-site versus two-site endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma 16(6):527–530

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tan JC, Francis BA, Noecker R et al (2016) Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and Pars Plana Ablation (ECP-plus) to treat refractory Glaucoma. J Glaucoma 25(3):e117–e122

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cheng J, Cabrera M, Lee JWY, Buys YM (2017) Glaucoma Laser, in Managing Complications in Glaucoma Surgery, F. Carbonaro and K.S. Lim, Editors. Springer International Publishing: Cham. pp. 1–20

Koduri VA, Reddy AK, Patnaik JL et al (2021) Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation combined with Phacoemulsification increases risk of Persistent Anterior Uveitis compared to phacoemulsification surgery alone. Clin Ophthalmol 15:437–443

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hu AY, Bourges JL, Shah SP et al (2009) Endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy a 20- and 25-gauge comparison. Ophthalmology 116(7):1360–1365

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holz HA, Lim MC (2005) Glaucoma lasers: a review of the newer techniques. Curr