Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011). This key review updates Hanahan and Wieinberg’s original landmark paper of 2000 with additional focus on genetic instability as an enabling characteristic and drugs targeting the hallmarks of cancer.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bartkova, J. et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434, 864–870 (2005).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bieging, K. T., Mello, S. S. & Attardi, L. D. Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 359–370 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Boulton, S. J. Cellular functions of the BRCA tumour-suppressor proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34, 633–645 (2006).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sarni, D. & Kerem, B. Oncogene-induced replication stress drives genome instability and tumorigenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1339 (2017).
Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jackson, S. P. & Bartek, J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 22, 1071–1078 (2009). This is an excellent review of the DDR and its implications for human health that remains relevant today.
Groelly, F. J., Fawkes, M., Dagg, R. A., Blackford, A. N. & Tarsounas, M. Targeting DNA damage response pathways in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 23, 78–94 (2023). This is an up-to-date review of the anticancer potential of targeting the DDR.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Colvin, M. & Chabner, B.A. in Cancer Chemotherapy: Principles and Practice (eds Chabner, B. A. & Collins, J. M.) 276–313 (Lippincott, 1990).
Pegg, A. E. Mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase: regulation and importance in response to alkylating carcinogenic and therapeutic agents. Cancer Res. 50, 6119–6129 (1990).
Rabik, C. A., Njoku, M. C. & Dolan, M. E. Inactivation of O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase as a means to enhance chemotherapy. Cancer Treat. Rev. 32, 261–276 (2006).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Blumenthal, D. T. et al. A Phase III study of radiation therapy (RT) and O6-benzylguanine + BCNU versus RT and BCNU alone and methylation status in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and gliosarcoma: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) study S0001. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 650–658 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Tawbi, H. A. et al. Inhibition of DNA repair with MGMT pseudosubstrates: phase I study of lomeguatrib in combination with dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma and other solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 105, 773–777 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Yu, W., Zhang, L., Wei, Q. & Shao, A. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT): challenges and new opportunities in glioma chemotherapy. Front. Oncol. 17, 1547 (2020).
Butler, M. et al. MGMT status as a clinical biomarker in glioblastoma. Trends Cancer 6, 380–391 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Purnell, M. R. & Whish, W. J. Novel inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase. Biochem. J. 185, 775–777 (1980).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Durkacz, B. W., Omidiji, O., Gray, D. A. & Shall, S. (ADP-ribose)n participates in DNA excision repair. Nature 283, 593–596 (1980). This study and that by Purnell & Whish (1980) show for the first time how the first PARPi, 3-aminobenzamide, potentiates the cytotoxicity of DNA methylating agents, suggesting its anticancer therapy potential.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ben-Hur, E. Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) in the radiation response of mammalian cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 46, 659–671 (1984).
Banasik, M., Komura, H., Shimoyama, M. & Ueda, K. Specific inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) synthetase and mono(ADP-ribosyl)transferase. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1569–1575 (1992). This article describes the identification, through the classic ‘analogue by catalogue’ approach, of many potent PARPis, some of which have been further elaborated to give us some of today’s clinical drugs.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Arundel-Suto, C. M., Scavone, S. V., Turner, W. R., Suto, M. J. & Sebolt-Leopold, J. S. Effects of PD128763, a new potent inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, on X-ray induced cellular recovery processes in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Radiat. Res. 126, 367–371 (1991).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Griffin, R. J. et al. Novel potent inhibitors of the DNA repair enzyme poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP). Anticancer Drug. Des. 10, 507–514 (1995).
Bowman, K. J., Newell, D. R., Calvert, A. H. & Curtin, N. J. Differential effects of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor NU1025 on topoisomerase I and II inhibitor cytotoxicity in L1210 cells in vitro. Br. J. Cancer 84, 106–112 (2001).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Smith, L. M., Willmore, E., Austin, C. A. & Curtin, N. J. The novel poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitor, AG14361, sensitizes cells to topoisomerase I poisons by increasing the persistence of DNA strand breaks. Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 8449–8457 (2005).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Wang, Z. Q. et al. Mice lacking ADPRT and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation develop normally but are susceptible to skin disease. Genes Dev. 9, 509–520 (1995).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
De Murcia, J. M. et al. Requirement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in recovery from DNA damage in mice and in cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7303–7307 (1997). This reference and Wang et al. (1995) are the first reports to describe PARP1-knockout mice.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ménissier de Murcia, J. et al. Functional interaction between PARP-1 and PARP-2 in chromosome stability and embryonic development in mouse. EMBO J. 22, 2255–2263 (2003).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Satoh, M. S. & Lindahl, T. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) formation in DNA repair. Nature 356, 356–358 (1992). This paper explores the role of PARP in DNA SSBR and is the first to describe the phenomenon in which inactive PARP (in the absence of substrate NAD+or in the presence of an inhibitor) has a much greater impact on the persistence of DNA damage than the depletion of PARP. The authors propose that PARP binding to the DNA break obstructs the repair machinery, unless it can auto-polyADP-ribosylate and dissociate from the break.
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Murai, J. et al. Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by clinical PARP inhibitors. Cancer Res. 72, 5588–5599 (2012). This article is one of the most recent studies determining that the trapping potency — rather than catalytic inhibition potency — of clinically active PARPis correlates with their cytotoxicity.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ferraris, D. V. Evolution of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) inhibitors. From concept to clinic. J. Med. Chem. 53, 4561–4584 (2010).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Thomas, H. D. et al. Preclinical selection of a novel poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor for clinical trial. Mol. Cancer Ther. 6, 945–956 (2007).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Plummer, R. et al. Phase I study of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, AG014699, in combination with temozolomide in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 14, 7917–7923 (2008). This paper describes the first clinical trial with a PARPi that included pharmacodynamic as well as pharmacokinetic monitoring to achieve the levels of PARP inhibition predicted to be active from in vivo preclinical studies.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Liu, Y., Pang, Y., Pacak, K. & Yang, C. Double-barreled gun: combination of PARP inhibitor with conventional chemotherapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 188, 168–175 (2018).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Curtin, N. J. & Szabo, C. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition: past, present and future. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 711–736 (2020).
留言 (0)