Boyes, J. & Bird, A. Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl-CpG binding protein. EMBO J. 11, 327–333 (1992).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Weber, M. et al. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39, 457–466 (2007).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553–560 (2007).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. D. et al. Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 479–491 (2010).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Reddington, J. P. et al. Redistribution of H3K27me3 upon DNA hypomethylation results in de-repression of Polycomb target genes. Genome Biol. 14, R25 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Holoch, D. et al.A cis-acting mechanism mediates transcriptional memory at Polycomb target genes in mammals. Nat. Genet. 53, 1686–1697 (2021).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Li, E., Bestor, T. H. & Jaenisch, R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 69, 915–926 (1992).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Faust, C., Schumacher, A., Holdener, B. & Magnuson, T. The eed mutation disrupts anterior mesoderm production in mice. Development 121, 273–285 (1995).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Okano, M., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A. & Li, E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99, 247–257 (1999).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
O’Carroll, D. et al. The Polycomb-group gene Ezh2 is required for early mouse development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 4330–4336 (2001).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Grosswendt, S. et al. Epigenetic regulator function through mouse gastrulation. Nature 584, 102–108 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Reddington, J. P., Sproul, D. & Meehan, R. R. DNA methylation reprogramming in cancer: does it act by re-configuring the binding landscape of Polycomb repressive complexes? Bioessays 36, 134–140 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wassef, M. & Margueron, R. The multiple facets of PRC2 alterations in cancers. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 1978–1993 (2017).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Greenberg, M. V. C. & Bourc’his, D. The diverse roles of DNA methylation in mammalian development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 590–607 (2019).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Tanay, A., O’Donnell, A. H., Damelin, M. & Bestor, T. H. Hyperconserved CpG domains underlie Polycomb-binding sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5521–5526 (2007).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Brinkman, A. B. et al. Sequential ChIP–bisulfite sequencing enables direct genome-scale investigation of chromatin and DNA methylation cross-talk. Genome Res. 22, 1128–1138 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Statham, A. L. et al. Bisulfite sequencing of chromatin immunoprecipitated DNA (BisChIP-seq) directly informs methylation status of histone-modified DNA. Genome Res. 22, 1120–1127 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Bird, A., Taggart, M., Frommer, M., Miller, O. J. & Macleod, D. A fraction of the mouse genome that is derived from islands of nonmethylated, CpG-rich DNA. Cell 40, 91–99 (1985).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. Programming and inheritance of parental DNA methylomes in mammals. Cell 15, 979–991 (2014).
Zheng, H. et al. Resetting epigenetic memory by reprogramming of histone modifications in mammals. Mol. Cell 63, 1066–1079 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. Distinct features of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 chromatin domains in pre-implantation embryos. Nature 537, 558–562 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Cooper, S. et al. Targeting Polycomb to pericentric heterochromatin in embryonic stem cells reveals a role for H2AK119u1 in PRC2 recruitment. Cell Rep. 7, 1456–1470 (2014).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Domcke, S. et al. Competition between DNA methylation and transcription factors determines binding of NRF1. Nature 528, 575–579 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chen, H. et al. H3K36 dimethylation shapes the epigenetic interaction landscape by directing repressive chromatin modifications in embryonic stem cells. Genome Res. 32, 825–837 (2022).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tsumura, A. et al. Maintenance of self‐renewal ability of mouse embryonic stem cells in the absence of DNA methyltransferases Dnmt1, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Genes Cells 11, 805–814 (2006).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Montgomery, N. D. et al. The murine Polycomb group protein Eed is required for global histone H3 lysine-27 methylation. Curr. Biol. 15, 942–947 (2005).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Smith, A. Formative pluripotency: the executive phase in a developmental continuum. Development 144, 365–373 (2017).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Kolodziejczyk, A. A. et al. Single cell RNA-sequencing of pluripotent states unlocks modular transcriptional variation. Cell Stem Cell 17, 471–485 (2015).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Hayashi, K., Ohta, H., Kurimoto, K., Aramaki, S. & Saitou, M. Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specification pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells. Cell 146, 519–532 (2011).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Marks, H. et al. The transcriptional and epigenomic foundations of ground state pluripotency. Cell 149, 590–604 (2012).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Habibi, E. et al. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of two distinct interconvertible DNA methylomes of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 13, 360–369 (2013).
留言 (0)