World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2021. Available from:  https://covid19.who.int/.

Google Scholar 

Ioannidis JPA. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. The Milbank Q. 2016;94:485–514.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kambhampati SBS, Vaishya R, Vaish A. Unprecedented surge in publications related to COVID-19 in the first three months of pandemic: a bibliometric analytic report. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:S304–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vickery J, Atkinson P, Lin L, Rubin O, Upshur R, Yeoh E-K, et al. Challenges to evidence-informed decision-making in the context of pandemics: qualitative study of COVID-19 policy advisor perspectives. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7:e008268–e008268.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elliott JH, Synnot A, Turner T, Simmonds M, Akl EA, McDonald S, et al. Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;91:23–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

The Cochrane Collaboration. Living systematic reviews. Available from: https://community.cochrane.org/review-production/production-resources/living-systematic-reviews. Accessed 12 July 2022.

Pearson H. How COVID broke the evidence pipeline. Nature. 2021;593:182–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:35–35.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lavis JN. COVID-END taxonomy of public-health measures, clinical management of COVID-19, health-system arrangements, and economic and social responses. 2021; Available from: https://www.mcmasterforum.org/docs/default-source/resources/resources_covid-taxonomy.pdf?sfvrsn=2b288648_5

Hong QN, Pluye P, Fabregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, et al. Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018. 2018; Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf

Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:10–10.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Britt A, Yang E, Crittenden D, Bhangdia T, Nye B, Duffy E-C, et al. Abstract P04: Effects of COVID-19 treatments on cancer: a machine learning approach to synthesize clinical evidence at scale. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:P04–P04.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hearnden J, Dudoit K, Kim E, Tremblay G, Forsythe A. PMU118 use of computer-assisted methods to realize the concept of a living systematic review via an online platform. Value Health. 2019;22:S729.

Article  Google Scholar 

Riaz IB, Siddiqi R, Asghar N, Cathcart-Rake EJ, Herasevich V, Montori V, et al. Living systematic reviews: a novel mechanism for improving efficiency and quality of evidence synthesis in oncology. JCO. 2019;37:241–241.

Article  Google Scholar 

Richard ME, Harricharan S, Anna F. PCN291 Always up-to-Date Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRS) NOW a Reality - an Example in NEWLY Diagnosed ACUTE Myeloid Leukemia (ND AML) and Relapsed/Refractory ACUTE Lymphoblastic Leukemia (RR ALL). Value Health. 2020;23:S473.

Article  Google Scholar 

Siqueira I, Clark E, Neil-Sztramko S, Belita E, Dobbins M. Informing policy on school and daycare operations during COVID-19 with a living rapid evidence review. European Journal of Public Health. 2021;31:ckab164.593.

Article  Google Scholar 

Carr E, Gregg E, McCool R, Sanderson A, Wilson K. The Proliferation of Living Systematic Reviews (LSRS) - Dead on Arrival? A Review of LSR Methodology. Value in Health. 2022;25:S491.

Article  Google Scholar 

Thompson JC, Manalastas E, Hombali A, Scott DA. MSR120 to include an error once may be regarded as a misfortune, to include it again looks like carelessness. Value Health. 2022;25:S373.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

He C, Chen Z, Kwon C, Musat M, Liu J, Sarri G, et al. HTA199 the reality of living systematic literature reviews to support timely healthcare decisions: a case study in relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Value Health. 2022;25:S335.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hair K, Macleod M, Bannach-Brown A, Bahor Z, Currie G, Liao J, et al. “Living” evidence frameworks for in vivo animal research: towards translational evidence-based medicine. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022;27:A17.

Google Scholar 

Golob MM, Livingstone-Banks J. toward a living model for health technology assessments. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022;27:A9–10.

Google Scholar 

Di Tanna GL, Sunjaya AP, Santos JA, Bhaumik S, Grant R. living systematic reviews (LSR) and prospective meta analysis (PMA): a call-of duty for bayesian analysis. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7:A14–5.

Google Scholar 

Sauca M, Tarchand R, Kallmes K. living systematic review (LSR) in health technology assessment (HTA): current guidance, methods, and challenges. Value Health. 2023;26:S390–S390.

Article  Google Scholar 

Diamond M, Valbuena-Fajardo J, Appiah K, Rizzo M. examining guidance and key principles for conducting living systematic reviews: a methods review. Value Health. 2023;26:S398–S398.

Article  Google Scholar 

ACM, Kusa W, Knoth P, Hanbury A. CRUISE-Screening: Living Literature Reviews Toolbox. 2023. p. 5071–5.

Google Scholar 

Liu J, Buer A, Rizzo M, Sarri G, Forsythe A. the data lifecycle: towards a standardized relational data model to support living systematic literature reviews? - use case demonstration with LIVESLR®. Value in Health. 2023;26:S270–S270.

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu R, Jafar R, Girard L, Thorlund K, Rizzo M, Forsythe A. improving efficiency of living systematic literature reviews (SLR) with artificial intelligence (AI): assisted extraction of population, intervention/comparator, outcome, and study design (P-I/C-O-S). Value Health. 2023;26:S6–S6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Turner T, Elliott J, Tendal B, Vogel JP, Norris S, Tate R, et al. The Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: What worked, what didn’t and why, a mixed methods process evaluation. Ugalde A, editor. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0261479.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Arienti C, Campagnini S, Brambilla L, Fanciullacci C, Lazzarini SG, Mannini A, et al. The methodology of a “living” COVID-19 registry development in a clinical context. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;142:209–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kingdon JW. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Edition LC, editor. New York: Longman Classics; 2011.

Lee C, Thomas M, Ejaredar M, Kassam A, Whittle SL, Buchbinder R, et al. Crowdsourcing trainees in a living systematic review provided valuable experiential learning opportunities: a mixed-methods study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;147:142–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Adjei G, Enuameh YA, Thomford NE. Prevalence of COVID-19 genomic variation in Africa: a living systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2022;20:158–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akl EA, Haddaway NR, Rada G, Lotfi T. Future of evidence ecosystem series: evidence synthesis 2.0: when systematic, scoping, rapid, living, and overviews of reviews come together. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;123:162–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Amer YS, Titi MA, Godah MW, Wahabi HA, Hneiny L, Abouelkheir MM, et al. International alliance and AGREE-ment of 71 clinical practice guidelines on the management of critical care patients with COVID-19: a living systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;142:333–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bell V, Wade D. Mental health of clinical staff working in high-risk epidemic and pandemic health emergencies a rapid review of the evidence and living meta-analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021;56:1–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bin Riaz I, Siddiqi R, Asghar N, Cathcart-Rake EJ, Herasevich V, Montori V, et al. Living systematic reviews: A novel mechanism for improving efficiency and quality of evidence synthesis in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37.

Boutron I, Ravaud P, Crequit P, Williams HC, Meerpohl J, Craig JC. Future of evidence ecosystem series: 3. From an evidence synthesis ecosystem to an evidence ecosystem. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;123:153–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crequit P, Boutron I, Meerpohl J, Williams HC, Craig J, Ravaud P. Future of evidence ecosystem series: 2. current opportunities and need for better tools and methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;123:143–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crequit P, Martin-Montoya T, Attiche N, Trinquart L, Vivot A, Ravaud P. Living network meta-analysis was feasible when considering the pace of evidence generation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;108:10–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crequit P, Trinquart L, Yavchitz A, Ravaud P. Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer. BMC Med. 2016;14:8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

D’Souza R, Malhamé I, Shah PS. Evaluating perinatal outcomes during a pandemic: a role for living systematic reviews. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101:4–6.

Article