The effectiveness of coronary computed tomography angiography and functional testing for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the individual patient data Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (COME-CCT)

Excellence NIfHaC (2016) Recent-onset chest pain of suspected cardiac origin: assessment and diagnosis. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg95. Accessed 16 Jan 2018

Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A et al (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41:407–477

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR et al (2020) Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 382:1395–1407

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

investigators S-H (2015) CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOTHEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Lancet 385:2383–2391

Article  Google Scholar 

Ovrehus KA, Jensen JK, Mickley HF et al (2010) Comparison of usefulness of exercise testing versus coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of patients suspected of having coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 105:773–779

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pontone G, Andreini D, Ballerini G et al (2007) Diagnostic work-up of unselected patients with suspected coronary artery disease: complementary role of multidetector computed tomography, symptoms and electrocardiogram stress test. Coron Artery Dis 18:265–274

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sato A, Nozato T, Hikita H et al (2010) Incremental value of combining 64-slice computed tomography angiography with stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging to improve noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 17:19–26

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schuetz GM, Schlattmann P, Achenbach S et al (2013) Individual patient data meta-analysis for the clinical assessment of coronary computed tomography angiography: protocol of the Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Cardiac CT (CoMe-CCT). Syst Rev 2:13

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/

Brown H, Prescott R (2015) Applied mixed models in medicine. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Coughlin SS, Trock B, Criqui MH et al (1992) The logistic modeling of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a diagnostic test. J Clin Epidemiol 45:1–7

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Simmonds MC, Higgins JP (2016) A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 25:2858–2877

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schuetz GM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M (2012) Use of 3x2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies. BMJ 345:e6717

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Diamond GA, Forrester JS (1979) Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med 300:1350–1358

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H et al (2011) A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J 32:1316–1330

Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S (2009) Prediction in multilevel generalized linear models. J R Statist Soc A 2009:659–687

Article  Google Scholar 

Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. Available from: http://CRAN.R-roject.org/package=lme4

Phillips B, Stewart LA, Sutton AJ (2010) Cross hairs’ plots for diagnostic meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 1:308–315

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Doebler P (2020) Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy with mada. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/mada/index.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2020

Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2008) Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur Heart J 29:766–776

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al (2010) Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart 96:933–938.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andreini D, Pontone G, Bartorelli AL et al (2010) Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol 9:80

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Andreini D, Pontone G, Bartorelli AL et al (2009) Sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomography: an accurate imaging modality for the evaluation of coronary arteries in dilated cardiomyopathy of unknown etiology. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2:199–205

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andreini D, Pontone G, Pepi M et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2044–2050

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen CC, Chen CC, Hsieh I-C et al (2011) The effect of calcium score on the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:37–42

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D et al (2006) Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Intern Med 145:407–415

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 120:867–875

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ghostine S, Caussin C, Daoud B et al (2006) Non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease in patients with left bundle branch block using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1929–1934

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Halvorsen B, Rødevand O, Hagen G et al (2008) [Angiography with 64-channel CT upon suspicion of stable coronary disease]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 128:2172–2176

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hamdan A, Asbach P, Wellnhofer E et al (2011) A prospective study for comparison of MR and CT imaging for detection of coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:50–61

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M et al (2007) Non-invasive coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the Coronary Angiography by Computed Tomography with the Use of a Submillimeter resolution (CACTUS) trial. Eur Heart J 28:3034–3041

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jenkins SM, Johnston N, Hawkins NM et al (2011) Limited clinical utility of CT coronary angiography in a district hospital setting. QJM 104:49–57

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al (2010) Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 122:603–613

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G et al (2005) Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:92–100

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Langer C, Peterschroder A, Franzke K et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography focusing on calcification: multislice computed tomography compared with magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:179–185

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leschka S, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al (2008) Combining dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: added value for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Heart 94:1154–1161

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D’Eliseo A et al (2004) Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur heart J 25:1043–1048

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mendoza-Rodríguez V, Llerena L, Llerena L et al (2009) Ischemic heart disease diagnosed by 64 slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol 7

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif